View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:35 am Post subject: Beer again. |
|
|
So, I know we talk a lot about beer on this board (or at least it seems that way) but I have a serious question. What's the difference between good beer and bad beer? And you can't answer by saying bad beer tastes like horse piss. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good beers don't have a chemical aftertaste. They are also not watery, though they can be light and easy to drink a lot of. There should be some kind of natural grain taste. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JLarter
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good beer is any beer that gets me drunk. Bad beer is any beer that gives me a hangover the next day! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
formerflautist

Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was actually wondering that, too. I dislike beers that I think are considered good beers. So what are some good beers and why are they good? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pegpig

Joined: 10 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good beer is good. Bad beer tastes like dog piss.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sid

Joined: 02 Feb 2003 Location: Berkshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good beer: UK, Japan
Bad beer: USA, Korea |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
sid wrote: |
Good beer: UK, Japan |
Sapparo, Kirin good?!?
Quote: |
Bad beer: USA, Korea |
You're obviously not an American. The US has some of the best beers in the world. And no, I'm not talking about Budweiser or Miller. My favs: Goose Island, Free State, and Herkimer. But those are just my local preferences. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dbee
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Location: korea
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good beer is generally brewed with barley malt, hops and fresh water. Alcohol production is basically centered around the chemical reaction that occurs spontaneously when yeast turns sugar into alcohol.
The best beers use barley as their 'malt'. Malt being the ingredient in beer that is used to provide the sugar. Pure barley is expensive to produce, so many beers which shalln't remain nameless (budweiser, cass, etc.... ) take a short cut in their beer production. And replace some of their barley with what is generally termed 'adjuncts'.
Adjuncts is the brewing term for low-quality sugar sources to replace barley, an example of which would be rice. Most Korean and large commercial American beers use adjuncts to speed up the fermentation process and to lower the costs of production. That's the very definition of low quality beer, and yes - that's also the reason some low-quality beers give you hangovers in the morning.
Hops are mostly used to give beer that fresh 'grassy' feel. Dutch beers are most notably for their hoppy grassy smell. Like when you open a bottle of heineken or especially a bottle of grolsch.
The world's best country for beer, all in all ?
Probably Germany. The Germans take their beer seriously, the Belgians treat their beers kinda like wine, and have 700 different fruit flavours of everything. Czech beer is amongst my favourite, as is Polish, but those countries also abound in low quality beers.
The reason I say Germany is because of Germany's 'rheinheitsgeboten' laws dating from 1516. Translating roughly as 'impurity forbidden'. Probably the oldest brewing laws on the planet. In Germany you can face hefty fines or even jail time (methinks) for brewing beer which has more than three ingredients.
Which ingredients ? ... you guessed it. Barley malt, hops and fresh water. That makes German beer in general, the world's best IMO. German beer (especially their Pils) are high on taste and low on hangovers.
Apart from that, in terms of just pure quality - you can't beat Warsteiner as a quaffing beer, becks as a hoppy, light, refreshing beer and anything you can pick up on a German supermarket shelf for $0.20 as an excellent budget beer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
In Germany you can face hefty fines or even jail time (methinks) for brewing beer which has more than three ingredients. |
Noooooo, you just cant call it reinheitsgebot beer. Its usually cheaper and called landbier. And you cant get reinheitsgebot beer for 20 cents. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dbee
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Location: korea
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Noooooo, you just cant call it reinheitsgebot beer. Its usually cheaper and called landbier.
|
... yes, it's not illegal to sell beers like budweiser in Germany. But you have to be careful of what you call it ...
Quote: |
And you cant get reinheitsgebot beer for 20 cents.
|
... I guess that depends where you look. Maybe if you'd spent time there as a holiday worker during summer break from University, you'd have honed your beer hunting skills a bit more  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, I just bought a case of Miller at Costco, and it tastes good to me--better than any Korean canned beer. Thing is, even after reading the posts on this thread, I still don't know WHY it tastes better.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flotsam
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
huffdaddy wrote: |
Sapparo, Kirin good?!?
|
Both excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
numazawa

Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: The Concrete Barnyard
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flotsam wrote: |
huffdaddy wrote: |
Sapparo, Kirin good?!?
|
Both excellent. |
All things being relative (which doesn't mean I get around that much ), they sure beat the pants off of any Korean beer. Oh... sorry to invoke the image of a naked Korean beer. The shame of it all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flotsam wrote: |
huffdaddy wrote: |
Sapparo, Kirin good?!?
|
Both excellent. |
We must have different definitions of excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChopChaeJoe wrote: |
Good beers don't have a chemical aftertaste. They are also not watery, though they can be light and easy to drink a lot of. There should be some kind of natural grain taste. |
I think this is true. I believe some countries add chemicals to the beer. Not sure why, perhaps their breweries aren't sanitary? All the beer in Taiwan, for example, was just terrible. It can cause bad hangovers, even mild psychosis. Ditto for Thai beers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|