| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Yo!Chingo

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul Korea
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As usual, Pat nails it:
Crux of the problem?
� Both parties are paralyzed by guilt over American past racial sins.
Solution.
� A ten-year moratorium on all legal immigration, at the level JFK favored in 1958 -- 150,000 to 250,000 a year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| good luck enforcing that one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's what I llike about you, BB; you're just filled to overflowing with confidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh I am; I'm quite confident that dogbert's "dream" won't become a reality.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
oh I am; I'm quite confident that dogbert's "dream" won't become a reality.  |
Agreeing with JFK is good company. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dogbert wrote: |
| bucheon bum wrote: |
oh I am; I'm quite confident that dogbert's "dream" won't become a reality.  |
Agreeing with JFK is good company. |
JFK was really quite weak in several areas. I am very much with Gore Vidal on Kennedy (see his historical novel Washington D.C.).
But let's set that aside for a moment. I do not believe that talking about what JFK may have said in 1958 can have too much relevance for the problems we are facing in 2006. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| dogbert wrote: |
| bucheon bum wrote: |
oh I am; I'm quite confident that dogbert's "dream" won't become a reality.  |
Agreeing with JFK is good company. |
JFK was really quite weak in several areas. I am very much with Gore Vidal on Kennedy (see his historical novel Washington D.C.).
But let's set that aside for a moment. I do not believe that talking about what JFK may have said in 1958 can have too much relevance for the problems we are facing in 2006. |
So your answer to these problems is no restrictions on immigration? I would say that JFK's advice is even more relevant to these problems since not following his advice in the first place (thanks LBJ!) has caused these very same problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| So your answer to these problems is no restrictions on immigration? |
That's not what I read Gopher as saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| On the other hand wrote: |
| Quote: |
| So your answer to these problems is no restrictions on immigration? |
That's not what I read Gopher as saying. |
He's saying that what JFK said about stricter limits on legal immigration is irrelevant to today's problems.
Ergo, he does not favor restrictions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
So your answer to these problems is no restrictions on immigration?
That's not what I read Gopher as saying.
He's saying that what JFK said about stricter limits on legal immigration is irrelevant to today's problems.
Ergo, he does not favor restrictions.
|
Couldn't it also be that he favours limitations, but just not as strict as the ones proposed by JFK? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |