Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

If you're still trying to get around the Monty Hall problem
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:06 am    Post subject: If you're still trying to get around the Monty Hall problem Reply with quote

(Geez I spell it like Monty Haul without thinking... points to any person that can tell what spelling Monty Hall like Monty Haul reveals about my past...)

The problem:

Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

Now if up front you're given the choice of only two doors (the third door never existed), the odds are 50/50. In the Monty Hall problem you're given three doors and then one door is revealed to have a goat and then you're back to a choice between two doors: keeping your door or picking the remaining closed door. It seems like we're back to a 50/50 proposition but no.

You should actually switch. You have a 2/3 chance of being right by switching.

Many people go "huh?"

Here is the best way to understand it. In short, you're not being given a chance to choose between two doors. In the second stage you're being given a chance to pick your door or all the other doors.

Lets increase the doors to 1 million doors. You pick one door. What are the odds you picked right? 1/1,000,000. What are the odds the car is behind any of the unpicked doors? 999,999/1,000,000. Now what if instead my next move was to give you the choice between staying with your door or switching to picking all the unopened doors. (No doors have yet been opened. You're just allowed to stay with your current door or pick the remaining unopened doors.) In other words, you can stay with your 1/1,000,00 chance or go with the 999,999/1,000,000 chance. You'd be foolish to stay with just one door when you could pick all the other doors. Right?

Of course the problem is you have to open 999,999 doors to find your car! The key to the Monty Hall problem is instead of you having to open many, many doors before you find your car, Monty Hall opens all the doors for you but one. It's a little service he provides for you. Since he knows where the car is, he doesn't actually open the remaining door with the car. He leaves that to you. That 999,999/1,000,000 chance is, for all intents and purposed, compressed into the one door Monty keeps closed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was just about to come in and tell you to spell it the way it should be - Monty Haul. I'm proud to say that none of my campaigns have ever been of that nature. It's all about grit and survival on Athas. You?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
I was just about to come in and tell you to spell it the way it should be - Monty Haul. I'm proud to say that none of my campaigns have ever been of that nature. It's all about grit and survival on Athas. You?


When I played, my first issue of Dragon magazine was not only called The Dragon but it was issue 29. Wormy was still a cartoon, Gary Gygax was still roughly in charge of TSR, people didn't call it T$R, the only women at gaming conventions were 300 lbs and married to navy submariners, Gary Gygax was talking about releasing the T2 module (Temple of Elemental Evil, sequel to Village of Homlet), and Gary Gygax made the solemn oath that if the D&D movie sucked, he would issue an apology to all the fans. Deities and Demi Gods included the Lovecraft/Nehwon gods and the Monster Manual had Demons and Devils. All hail, Asmodeus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beej



Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Location: Eungam Loop

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you logic is faulty here. If you are given the choice to change doors after one door is revealed, its a 50/50 proposition. nce a door is revealed it is not part of the eqaution. Its either behind door 1 or 2.

Same thing with a series of coin tosses. Five tosses in a row are heads. Many people will choose tails on the next toss because the odds are low for six tosses a row being the same. But that sixth toss is actually 50/50. The first five tosses no longer matter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woland



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beej wrote:
I think you logic is faulty here. If you are given the choice to change doors after one door is revealed, its a 50/50 proposition. nce a door is revealed it is not part of the eqaution. Its either behind door 1 or 2.

Same thing with a series of coin tosses. Five tosses in a row are heads. Many people will choose tails on the next toss because the odds are low for six tosses a row being the same. But that sixth toss is actually 50/50. The first five tosses no longer matter.


You'e missed the point that Monty Hall knows where the money is; that knowledge changes the context of the problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woland wrote:
Beej wrote:
I think you logic is faulty here. If you are given the choice to change doors after one door is revealed, its a 50/50 proposition. nce a door is revealed it is not part of the eqaution. Its either behind door 1 or 2.

Same thing with a series of coin tosses. Five tosses in a row are heads. Many people will choose tails on the next toss because the odds are low for six tosses a row being the same. But that sixth toss is actually 50/50. The first five tosses no longer matter.


You'e missed the point that Monty Hall knows where the money is; that knowledge changes the context of the problem.


I did leave that point out, assuming people understood the assumptions of the problem already or at least knew the rules behind Let's Make a Deal.

Yes. Monty Hall, as the game show host, knows where the car is. He gives you a choice between staying with your door or opening all the other doors. But since he knows where the car is, he does most of the work for you, opening the doors with goats, leaving the car door unopened. He just does the work first and then makes the offer to switch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monty's knowledge is not the key to the problem.

Draw up a probability chart and you will see that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hater Depot wrote:
Monty's knowledge is not the key to the problem.

Draw up a probability chart and you will see that.


Errr. Actually it is in that Monty has to know what door not to open. Take the 1000 door case. Monty needs to open 998 doors, leaving one door closed. He's likely, in his quest to open 998 doors, stumble on the car door before he manages to open 998 goat doors.

The problem is set up so Monty, in every case, can leave a car door closed if the car is behind such a door.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thunndarr



Joined: 30 Sep 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like watching people come to grips with this problem. Most people are so stuck on what they "know" is right that they can't look at the problem rationally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troll_Bait



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
mithridates wrote:
I was just about to come in and tell you to spell it the way it should be - Monty Haul. I'm proud to say that none of my campaigns have ever been of that nature. It's all about grit and survival on Athas. You?


When I played, my first issue of Dragon magazine was not only called The Dragon but it was issue 29. Wormy was still a cartoon, Gary Gygax was still roughly in charge of TSR, people didn't call it T$R, the only women at gaming conventions were 300 lbs and married to navy submariners, Gary Gygax was talking about releasing the T2 module (Temple of Elemental Evil, sequel to Village of Homlet), and Gary Gygax made the solemn oath that if the D&D movie sucked, he would issue an apology to all the fans. Deities and Demi Gods included the Lovecraft/Nehwon gods and the Monster Manual had Demons and Devils. All hail, Asmodeus.


They're collectors' items now, especially Deities and Demi-gods. A friend of mine back in Canada had them but doesn't know where they are now. You see, he got married and had a kid. He became a real grown-up. I'm still living my extended childhood.

mindmetoo wrote:
mithridates wrote:
I was just about to come in and tell you to spell it the way it should be - Monty Haul. I'm proud to say that none of my campaigns have ever been of that nature. It's all about grit and survival on Athas. You?


When I played, my first issue of Dragon magazine was not only called The Dragon but it was issue 29. Wormy was still a cartoon, Gary Gygax was still roughly in charge of TSR, people didn't call it T$R, the only women at gaming conventions were 300 lbs and married to navy submariners, Gary Gygax was talking about releasing the T2 module (Temple of Elemental Evil, sequel to Village of Homlet), and Gary Gygax made the solemn oath that if the D&D movie sucked, he would issue an apology to all the fans. Deities and Demi Gods included the Lovecraft/Nehwon gods and the Monster Manual had Demons and Devils. All hail, Asmodeus.


There were two Dungeons and Dragons movies, both of which sucked rotten eggs. I want my apology!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Troll_Bait wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
mithridates wrote:
I was just about to come in and tell you to spell it the way it should be - Monty Haul. I'm proud to say that none of my campaigns have ever been of that nature. It's all about grit and survival on Athas. You?


When I played, my first issue of Dragon magazine was not only called The Dragon but it was issue 29. Wormy was still a cartoon, Gary Gygax was still roughly in charge of TSR, people didn't call it T$R, the only women at gaming conventions were 300 lbs and married to navy submariners, Gary Gygax was talking about releasing the T2 module (Temple of Elemental Evil, sequel to Village of Homlet), and Gary Gygax made the solemn oath that if the D&D movie sucked, he would issue an apology to all the fans. Deities and Demi Gods included the Lovecraft/Nehwon gods and the Monster Manual had Demons and Devils. All hail, Asmodeus.


They're collectors' items now, especially Deities and Demi-gods. A friend of mine back in Canada had them but doesn't know where they are now. You see, he got married and had a kid. He became a real grown-up. I'm still living my extended childhood.


Yeah some guy named Ralph Middleton "borrowed" my copy of D&DG with the orginal copyright abusin' myths and never returned it. Sigh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troll_Bait



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
Yeah some guy named Ralph Middleton "borrowed" my copy of D&DG with the orginal copyright abusin' myths and never returned it. Sigh.


How the heck can one copyright myths that are several thousands of years old?!

"You can't say 'Hercules' unless you pay me! I 'own' that name!"

Then again, people used to think that putting patents on genetically-engineered life-forms was ridiculous. I mean, how can you "own" life itself? But it's happened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
captain planet



Joined: 18 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i've seen this problem a lot of times before, but since i couldn't figure out what the show was about (i was young, everyone was dressed like a moron, and the sound reception was mediocre), i can't figure out exactly what the question is asking. i don't understand the setup of the show, and any attempt to think about this problem is clouded by thoughts of spandex, toupees, goats, and slide trombones.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Troll_Bait wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
Yeah some guy named Ralph Middleton "borrowed" my copy of D&DG with the orginal copyright abusin' myths and never returned it. Sigh.


How the heck can one copyright myths that are several thousands of years old?!

"You can't say 'Hercules' unless you pay me! I 'own' that name!"

Then again, people used to think that putting patents on genetically-engineered life-forms was ridiculous. I mean, how can you "own" life itself? But it's happened.


No no... these were myths from modern works of fiction. It's like using the Tolkein creation story, gods, demons, etc. The Tolkein estate will quickly sue you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troll_Bait



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
No no... these were myths from modern works of fiction. It's like using the Tolkein creation story, gods, demons, etc. The Tolkein estate will quickly sue you.


Embarassed Oops, sorry, I should have read what you wrote a few posts before more carefully.

Now I remember. It had deities from the worlds of Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, Elric, and Cthulhu.

But the new edition also cut out a lot of traditional pantheons (such as the Babylonian and Celtic ones) as well, which is probably what I was thinking about.

Actually, I found the full story here.
Quote:
TSR, Inc. obtained permission from Michael Moorcock for inclusion of the Melnibon�an material (from his Elric series of books). The Cthulhu Mythos was believed to be in the public domain, so TSR assumed they could legally use it without any special permission. However, Arkham House, who had the copyright on most Cthulhu books had already licensed the Cthulhu property to the game company Chaosium to create a Mythos-based game. Furthermore, Chaosium had also licensed the Melnibon�an copyright from Moorcock. Chaosium became upset that TSR was apparently violating its license. The first printing was halted and the two companies agreed on a compromise: TSR could use the Cthulhu material, but needed to include a special "thank you" note to Chaosium for both the Cthulhu mythos and Melnibon�an information. TSR added the special thank you note and the printing continued.

When the time came for a third printing of the book, TSR felt its material should not contain such an overt reference to one of its competitors in the "Special Thank You" note. So they removed the Cthulhu and Melnibon�an pantheons, thus negating the need for the "Thank you" note. For this reason, the first and second editions were (and are, among collectors) in greater demand than later printings. (Paradoxically, the "Thank you" note was still included in the first printing to contain the shortened list of pantheons � though this oversight was remedied in subsequent printings.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International