|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:47 am Post subject: Ban Muslim ghettos |
|
|
Things are really heating up!
Quote: |
Ban Muslim ghettos, says Cameron
Last updated at 11:46am on 4th October 2006
David Cameron today vowed to break up Muslim ghettos in Britain's cities.
The Tory leader said Islamic schools should in future admit a quarter of their pupils from other faiths. And he said that housing estates should be planned to avoid creating isolated communities. |
www.dailymail.co.uk
The unintended meaning of Mr. Cameron's ideas is that muslisms cannot live apart or in isolation. Not Buddhists, Jews or Scientologists, but muslims. They cannot be trusted. They are not assimilating and must be made to and an "or else" isn't far behind. This is the beginning of the end of European Islam. I wonder where they will all go? Will their ethnic homes accept them?
I'm not saying it is good or bad. It is what it is.
[/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really?? I thought the meaning was,
"Islamic schools should in future admit a quarter of their pupils from other faiths. And he said that housing estates should be planned to avoid creating isolated communities".
It's not a matter of muslims or anyone else being trusted to live apart. No-one should be living apart. Urban planners should be incorporating immigrants into existing communities, instead of allowing enclaves to be created.
It's probably a bit sensationalist to "BAN" a ghetto, more like planning so that they aren't created by default. A good thing for everyone involved. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right. But he used the word "ban". That suggests a very aggressive and non-negotiable position. One that will absolutely be (rightly) seen as a challenge to the authority structures within the ghettos. That the UK will start asserting authority in these areas again. It is an epic idea, when seen in the context of small muslim enclaves that are muslim governed and managed.
He drew a line in the sand, and then put flowers over it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
BJWD wrote: |
Right. But he used the word "ban". That suggests a very aggressive and non-negotiable position. One that will absolutely be (rightly) seen as a challenge to the authority structures within the ghettos. That the UK will start asserting authority in these areas again. It is an epic idea, when seen in the context of small muslim enclaves that are muslim governed and managed.
He drew a line in the sand, and then put flowers over it. |
Nice line... Yeh, he did a politicians job, using an evocative, but clearly inappropriate, word for what he was referring to. In my hometown in Aus the department for low income housing has incorporated some aprtments in the more upmarket areas, inner city, near the beach, new developments. The older, "poor" suburbs are being broken up with people moving in to better accomodation. No one's kicking or screaming when they leave their outer suburban sand pit.
It doesn't have to be a matter of asserting and authority. Plan your sheet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Right. But he used the word "ban". That suggests a very aggressive and non-negotiable position. |
The government's job is to do what society won't rightly do for itself . Laws, restrictions, looking after the poor, social programs, protecting vital resources etc....
In this case, they are doing their job. Ban. Law. Restriction, whatever the name. It is still promoting how people should live and making people do what is right for them, seeing they won't do it themselves.
It has been shown the world over, that once people live together, multi-ethnically, they begin to see things much different and the polarization and blind suspicions and hatred start to vanish. Promoting multi culturalism in such a way, is a great step for the British.
DD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, DD, you are saying that the History of the world demonstrates to you that there is more peace when ethnic groups mix? Really?
I'm a big booster of the ways that Singapore, for example, has forced racial harmony upon the people with ethnic quotas in the HDB flats etc etc but I really don't agree with you at all that the thrust of history shows this. At best we can cherry pick examples of success here and there.
What is needed is a breaking down of ethnic groups, the melting pot, the American Idea, not multiculturalism. Singapore does a good job at this, and in fact, just a few weeks ago the PM said on national TV, repeatedly, "we need to be more like the Americans and less like the Europeans" (direct quote), meaning more melting pot and less multiculturalism. If Singapore, or America for that matter, are at all examples of successful ethnic mixing, it would seem that the state policy of multiculturalism is the opposite of what is needed.
They shouldn't be promoting multiculturalism, but a flexible British culture of many racial groups. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
BJWD wrote: |
So, DD, you are saying that the History of the world demonstrates to you that there is more peace when ethnic groups mix? Really?
I'm a big booster of the ways that Singapore, for example, has forced racial harmony upon the people with ethnic quotas in the HDB flats etc etc but I really don't agree with you at all that the thrust of history shows this. At best we can cherry pick examples of success here and there.
What is needed is a breaking down of ethnic groups, the melting pot, the American Idea, not multiculturalism. Singapore does a good job at this, and in fact, just a few weeks ago the PM said on national TV, repeatedly, "we need to be more like the Americans and less like the Europeans" (direct quote), meaning more melting pot and less multiculturalism. If Singapore, or America for that matter, are at all examples of successful ethnic mixing, it would seem that the state policy of multiculturalism is the opposite of what is needed.
They shouldn't be promoting multiculturalism, but a flexible British culture of many racial groups. |
I don't know what cherry picked successes you have in mind, but I'd like to contribute the Australian experience here. Australia has had a long tradition of multiculturalism, and in my personal experience, it's been pretty successful. I'd agree though, that people do need to have a common purpose, and language in order to create a choesive society. Really, that common purpose is being in the work force, buying a home, providing for your family etc.
Pretty much every ethnic group and culture is engaged, more or less successfully, in doing this while maintaing their own cultural identity and community. To me the tap dance being done atop the terms "multiculturalism" and "melting pot" are beside the point. Any group that is able to be engaged in the economy will be engaged in 'assimilating', without affecting their cultural identity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we are using a different meaning of "culture". When I speak of culture, I mean a 'shared perspective', one that is unique to a time, place and people. Australia has her own culture, that is, one of democracy, civil rights, the enlightenment and modernity. That is Australian culture, like Canada and others. Many 'shared perspectives' (I won't mention the elephant in the room) are quite opposite of this and cannot occupy the same space without a struggle for dominance.
So, you can say that "x" people can live in "x" nation provided they adopt the dominant culture. They can bring their wine, dress and food (which aren't culture properly defined, but 'cultural artifacts', like Totem Poles) but you cannot, if you want peace, accept competing cultures into the same society. One will eventually dominate the other.
Again, the melting pot is the best idea we have (bring your wine, food and song, but "act American/Singaporean/Australian" etc). Multiculturalism is potentially suicidal for the dominant culture.
I think your PM Howard would agree with this, what with his repeated calls to "Australian Values". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thread number 28374 "UK allows too many immigrants" thread from an OP whose own countries half arsed immigration policy results in him being trapped in hagwon hell because he lacks the Spanish language skills to work the fish fryer in Dennys. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
You talking about me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not really, these sorts of threads in general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I know, this is the first thread about Brit pols saying that muslims ought not be allowed to live in seclusion.
Nor it it about "too many immigrants", but the failure to assimilate one specific group.
You aware of the race-riots happening, as I type this, in Windsor?
I think the issue is quite important, and getting more so every day.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23369687-details/Race+clashes+hit+Windsor/article.do
Quote: |
Extra police are being drafted into the Windsor area today after three nights of violent clashes between white and Asian youths.
Gangs have fought battles in the streets using baseball bats and pitchforks. A Muslim-run dairy which wants to build a mosque was petrol bombed.
Dozens of officers have been deployed to stop and search youths and mounted police are being brought in.
The Queen usually spends weekends at Windsor Castle and no decision has yet been taken over whether she would change her plans. A senior source said: "We are aware of what is happening and all appropriate security measures are in place." |
Not an issue, I suppose. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
over 100 people have been murdered in my hometown this year. The population of where I live is only 375,000. Nearby San Francisco set a record last year for homicides and has a high rate this year as well.
in other words, the usa (and likely canada) has a lot more pressing issues than muslim immigrants.
If you lived in France or even the UK, i'd be a little more sympathetic but a) you live in korea b) you're canadian. Talk about being afraid of a boogy monster. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am Canadian, and I don't live in Korea.
Why do I have to be European to show concern about this? And besides, this matters in Canada too. Just this week 4 muslim men repeated a pattern that is happening all over Europe and confined and gang-raped a woman for a few days. There was a plot to cut off the head of Harper. Your typical Canadian is about as friendly to Muslims as she/he is to being punched, but naive policy doesn't reflect this.
Muslim-Western relations will be THE issue for the next few years (decades?).
Expansive Islam affects Canada, though not as much as it does Europe. And besides, I post about many things. This is the only issue I ever get responses about.
I'd much rather discuss innovative ways to use tax policy to lessen global warming/cooling, or drug policy. Or a wide variety of things. Pair Hilton and her wonky eye.
This is the only issue that ever turns into a discussion.
Stop changing the subject. Have you nothing to say about the topic? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
BJWD wrote: |
Why do I have to be European to show concern about this? And besides, this matters in Canada too. Just this week 4 muslim men repeated a pattern that is happening all over Europe and confined and gang-raped a woman for a few days. There was a plot to cut off the head of Harper. Your typical Canadian is about as friendly to Muslims as she/he is to being punched, but naive policy doesn't reflect this. |
Ever watch Law & Order:SVU? Ever listen to loveline? Ever read the paper? 4 muslim men gang-raped a woman. Wow, ain't that special. I'm sure if they were any other religion they wouldn't have found inspiration to do it. Dude, come on.. Give me a break.
Quote: |
Muslim-Western relations will be THE issue for the next few years (decades?). |
ain't you a genius. It has been a major issue since Muslims went beyond Arabia. One could argue it has been an issue since the fall of the Roman empire (albeit not related to Islam prior to Mohammed obviously).
Quote: |
Stop changing the subject. Have you nothing to say about the topic? |
Who is changing the subject? The subject is Muslims in the west is it not?
Yes, housing "estates" should be planned better, I agree.
I think the religious school bit is just dumb. Do Muslim schools get public funding? If not, they can do whatever the hell they want to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|