|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
Nono. I don't mean Germany wouldn't grant me citizenship, but that I could not become German. American isn't an ethnicity, German is.
My larger idea is that European identities are closely related to ideas of race and ethnicity (not to mention religion) whereas in America they are less so. This makes it easier to assimilate in America for the very obvious reason that full assimilation in Germany, for example, is impossible. You can never become German, you can only be born German. In my opinion, this is why European nations opted for multiculturalism over the so-called melting-pot. They never intended to permanently absorb the immigrates because 1) they can't and 2) they don't want to. |
I disagree with the idea that you cannot become a German. Two of Germany's best soccer players were born in Poland.
There are Germans with Central European and Slavic last names. If they have been in Germany for quite some time, than they are Germans.
However, you do have a point to some extent. In France, you can have an Irish or German last name and be French. Quite many a Frenchman is without a name connected to other European nations. It is one thing to have a European melting pot of Europeans, but it is another to absorb
North Africans and to a lesser extent Serbians, Bosnians, Turks, Albanians.
In the U.S., to a large extent, being American is to some extent abroad and in the U.S. associated with being Caucasian. This is true in Canada as well. If you recall, Senator Allen called a person whose parents were born in India "Macacca". He would not have used that word if the person were of European origin. In an ironic twist, Senator Allen was incensed when people asked him whether his mother was Jewish. She was a Jewish convert to Christianity and an ancestor had an Italian or Spanish sounding name and was Jewish. In the eyes of many Americans, you have to be born American. I have spoken to many Americans who feel that way. By the way, it does not look like Americans are very enthusiastic about immigration, either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are totally missing my point.
I'm not saying that Americans are more in favour of immigration or that one cannot take German citizenship.
I have 2 central assumptions..
1) American identity is less intertwined with race/ethnicity and Europe more so. No absolutes, just tendencies.
2) Europeans do not accept outsiders, those who are not ethnically theirs, as theirs. You can never become German, ever. You can have a piece of paper saying your citizenship is German, but you are a "x" living in Germany.
1&2 make is easier (not easiest or easy) to assimilate into Yank society and accordingly, more difficult in Europe. This isn't a controversial position. In fact, it is the most common topic of conversation between myself, my American friends and my European muslim colleagues at school.
By the by, I would agree that Canadian is very much about being white. This became most clear to me when I discovered that non-white Canadians call whites "The Canadians", but seldom use the term for themselves (ie. I have Canadian citizenship not I am Canadian). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
Nono. I don't mean Germany wouldn't grant me citizenship, but that I could not become German. American isn't an ethnicity, German is.
My larger idea is that European identities are closely related to ideas of race and ethnicity (not to mention religion) whereas in America they are less so. This makes it easier to assimilate in America for the very obvious reason that full assimilation in Germany, for example, is impossible. You can never become German, you can only be born German. In my opinion, this is why European nations opted for multiculturalism over the so-called melting-pot. They never intended to permanently absorb the immigrates because 1) they can't and 2) they don't want to. |
OK, I see what you're saying, but why exactly does nationality, ethnicity and location have to coincide to constitute assimilation? For all first generation immigrants, yes, I can see that they'll have difficulties assimilating. This is true in Australia as well. Second generation immigrants, the kids who grow up in the 'new' country, learn the language, absorb the values are VERY Australian. I've met Africans and Asians in Australia who speak with broad Australian ocker accents who have the same interests as other Aussie kids that age.
As for Europe, I've never lived there long enough to draw any conclusions one way or another, but it seems to me that you're working from a conception of a very 'white' Europe. I don't think this is neccesarily true. It's my impression that there are already large groups of immigrants, already into the second generation, who are well assimilated and part of life in their new home country.
For those who don't know any other country than the one they've grown up in, they are part of that country. It doesn't matter who won't "accept" them as such. The government does, their school does, their experience does. What are you basing this European non acceptance of immigrants on? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with your first paragraph for the most part. But, Oz, like America, is a nation of immigrants making it more like America and less like Europe.
What I mean by assimilation is two-fold. First, and most importantly, do you accept the 'host' (for lack of a better word) culture as your own and second does the host culture accept you as one of their own. The first is easier than the second, and it is the second that is really causing all my worries.
This (assimilation) ought to be independent of race or ethnicity but isn't. We all admit that it isn't. I think we all want colour not to matter but it does. Humans suck.
And it is because race/ethnicity are not separate from nationality and assimilation (in the eyes of either the host culture or the newcomer) is exactly why I've become so very skeptical of Western immigration policies (less Oz, actually). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I can see that Australia would be grouped with the US in your theory.
I think the core of my disagreement with your perceptions is right about hereish...
| Quote: |
This (assimilation) ought to be independent of race or ethnicity but isn't. We all admit that it isn't. I think we all want colour not to matter but it does. Humans suck.
And it is because race/ethnicity are not separate from nationality and assimilation (in the eyes of either the host culture or the newcomer) is exactly why I've become so very skeptical of Western immigration policies |
It isn't?? There was a meeting?? I'm limited to the Australian experience in my assessment, but when I went to high school there were Aboriginals, New Zealanders, Indians, Burmese, Chinese, Singaporeans, Nigerians, English, Germans, Italians, Greeks, Australians, and one Welsh kid going to school. There was limited friction based on race and people were hanging out with the people they liked not in their ethnic groups. There was one kid who was vocal about disliking the Asian kids, but she was German and had a big, square head - so no-one cared what she thought.
I'm having a hard time accepting your assessment, because it's very different to what I've experienced, and this was in one of the roughest, working class high schools in the city.
Funnily enough it was the suburb to host the Australian Nationalilists, a suburban Nazi group, who would run around putting up 'go home darky' posters, bomb chinese restaurants and kill each other outside the local pub for being police informants. These guys were the abberration, and the ones who weren't able to seperate race and ethnicity from nationality. Weird since their 5 foot 1 leader was half malay, but would deny it and trot around the local shop dressed in khakis with a Hitler mo' and do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Relating to the article, I'm often told how great diversity is but its never proven to me. People aren't zoo animals, diversity has zoo like characterisitcs. Its unatural and leads to a decrease in quality of life. I am usually presented anecdotal evidence submitted to me but here's some evidence thats more scientific. |
Dulouz, never mind how your eminent Harvard boy author has been chastized as being methodologically "inventive" and as wishy washy regarding the notion of "civic mindedness" as the bowling leagues he knows so well and based a whole academic treatis on.
Never mind. I will address your own ignorance as the above statement shows. It is like a confession.
Diversity is unnatural???? I will avoid quoting Whitman and go right to the scientific reality -- Darwin and most importantly for scientists, frequency dependent selection which allows for populations to survive. We are much more diverse in genotype than you'd ever want to find out my dear friend......One pioneer in the field of genetics and also cultural transmission theory would be a good read for you.....Cavalli-Sforza's The History and Geography of Human Genes .
But then again, I don't think Amazon delivers to Pitcaire Island?
Diversity is the holy grail of life. No man is an island and all that.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beck's
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ethnic Europeans are in serious trouble. They are not reproducing themselves. Ethnic Europeans are an aging group. They are increasingly lacking the energy and will to defend and promote their culture. This applies to all western countries. Political correctness is just part of this. Westerners are often embarrassed to brag about the accomplishments of their culture.
Seems to me that an aging society cannot assimilate a vibrant and youthful immigrant one. I don't care whether it's in the banlieu of Paris or the suburbs of Toronto. It's just not going to happen. The demographics are against it.
We are in the early stages of the fall of the west. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| This (assimilation) ought to be independent of race or ethnicity but isn't. We all admit that it isn't. I think we all want colour not to matter but it does. |
But it matters to only SOME people. Not all. For many people it is not an issue at all. There are far too many inter-racial marriages to ignore that evidence. Color matters to some people because they want it to matter and some of their actions force it to matter to other people.
Religion is much the same. Jews have largely assimilated into American society while still keeping their religion. Some segments of the Jewish community have assimilated far more than others. The most conservative elements have assimilated the least. They wear funny clothes, have odd hair dos and have special food requirements that require certain adjustments sometimes, but their overall contributions to society make it worth that extra effort. The same can be true for Moslems in Europe. It takes time, patience and good will from all sides, but it can be done.
Assimilation does not have to be black or white, 100%, all or nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| happeningthang wrote: |
Yeah, I can see that Australia would be grouped with the US in your theory.
I think the core of my disagreement with your perceptions is right about hereish...
| Quote: |
This (assimilation) ought to be independent of race or ethnicity but isn't. We all admit that it isn't. I think we all want colour not to matter but it does. Humans suck.
And it is because race/ethnicity are not separate from nationality and assimilation (in the eyes of either the host culture or the newcomer) is exactly why I've become so very skeptical of Western immigration policies |
It isn't?? There was a meeting?? I'm limited to the Australian experience in my assessment, but when I went to high school there were Aboriginals, New Zealanders, Indians, Burmese, Chinese, Singaporeans, Nigerians, English, Germans, Italians, Greeks, Australians, and one Welsh kid going to school. There was limited friction based on race and people were hanging out with the people they liked not in their ethnic groups. There was one kid who was vocal about disliking the Asian kids, but she was German and had a big, square head - so no-one cared what she thought.
I'm having a hard time accepting your assessment, because it's very different to what I've experienced, and this was in one of the roughest, working class high schools in the city.
Funnily enough it was the suburb to host the Australian Nationalilists, a suburban Nazi group, who would run around putting up 'go home darky' posters, bomb chinese restaurants and kill each other outside the local pub for being police informants. These guys were the abberration, and the ones who weren't able to seperate race and ethnicity from nationality. Weird since their 5 foot 1 leader was half malay, but would deny it and trot around the local shop dressed in khakis with a Hitler mo' and do. |
I think your experience in Oz supports my thesis. Nations of immigrants are better at assimilating more immigrants.
I think the USA and Oz are going to be fine. Europe, I'm not so sure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
I think your experience in Oz supports my thesis. Nations of immigrants are better at assimilating more immigrants.
I think the USA and Oz are going to be fine. Europe, I'm not so sure. |
OK. I'm just wondering why you think Europe is different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Because I think Europeans are far more ethnic-minded and, well, racist than Oz, NZ, USA or Canada.
For example of things that often happen in Europe and never happen in the former British colonies anymore see this:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390000-2006470092,00.html
Okok, maybe that isn't fair. It is one of the more backwards euro states.
In Germany, the Turks (who were brought in a factory workers and we supposed to leave) are not accepted. Not at all. The form a totally parallel society. This is the case all over Europe. For reference, look at the Times article I posted at the beginning of this thread.
Europeans seldom like each other, why would we think they would welcome the very different muslims, North Africans and Asians? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ummm....well, there are exclusionists in pretty much every society, but they usually comprise a small minority.
The skinhead and Nazi movements in Germany and Croatia are well known. That kind of thing does happen in Australia and the US as well, and these people are considered to be the vocal, not-that-bright minority where ever they may be. The Australian Nationalists, I mentioned before, the Arayan Brotherhood in the US these guys are committed to white exclusivity, and don't seem that different from their European counterparts.
I really don't know what life's like in Europe, and I hope to hear from some people who do to give this discussion more life than people trying to extropolate the character of a whole continent based on some newspaper articles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| happeningthang wrote: |
Ummm....well, there are exclusionists in pretty much every society, but they usually comprise a small minority.
The skinhead and Nazi movements in Germany and Croatia are well known. That kind of thing does happen in Australia and the US as well, and these people are considered to be the vocal, not-that-bright minority where ever they may be. The Australian Nationalists, I mentioned before, the Arayan Brotherhood in the US these guys are committed to white exclusivity, and don't seem that different from their European counterparts.
I really don't know what life's like in Europe, and I hope to hear from some people who do to give this discussion more life than people trying to extropolate the character of a whole continent based on some newspaper articles. |
Of course their are racists in the US etc. I think Europe is more racist. Can you imagine monkey calls at a Texas A&M football game? Never. But quite common in SE Europe.
Anyhow, I think we are going to have to agree to disagree. I hope you are right, and my opinion of the future of race-riots and ethnic deportations in Europe is wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neil
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not saying BJWD is wrong but I wouldn't lump all of Europe together.
I'm sure USA/Oz has regional differences but at the end of the day you all speak the same language, study the same history at school ect. So maybe it's easier to judge the general mood of the country.
With Europe on the other hand you have 30 odd countries all with different languages, cultures and a history of fighting each other.....some places are going to have different ideas about stuff.
Also I'd wager Liberal/Social democrat parties have more sucess in elections in Europe compared to elsewhere which doesn't give me the impression that there's lots of racist sentiment and whilst I have some sympathy for those who complain about immigration I wouldn't want to go down the road of Howard's Australia (which you cite as a good example of assimilating immigrants).
I'm rambling now but I'd say your point applies more to southern europe than the northern countries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, Little Johnny Howard was still living with his mum when I was a kid (seriously, the guy didn't leave home until he got married). The multicultural Australia was championed by the Hawke/Keating years of the true believing Labour Party. It seemed to work at the time, and still does despite Howard's detention centres and general 'fortress australia' approach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|