|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Ddeubel wrote: |
| Believe me, Islamic society IS having the discussions... |
Show me. Show me where there are any people in the Middle East comparable to the bitter ant-West critics we have seen emerge in the West since the 1960s. |
Your response, above, on the previous page, suggests that you have nothing but assertion.
Call me whatever you like. That changes this not one iota. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
| ...also tell him about the problems, still unresolved, of me, getting a library card for the National Congress. |
Are you talking about "the Library of Congress?"
Here is your answer, then...
| Quote: |
All patrons of the Library's public reading rooms are required to have Reader Identification cards issued by the Library. The cards are free, and can be obtained by presenting a valid driver's license, state-issued identification card, or passport at the Reader Registration Station in Room LM 140, on the first floor of the Madison Building near the Independence Avenue entrance. The Reader Registration Station's hours are: 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday; 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, Friday, and Saturday (closed Sundays and federal holidays). Researchers must register in person at the Reader Registration Station; the Library cannot take registrations via telephone or the Internet.
Upon completion of a simple self-registration process, the station attendant will check the information, take an identification photo, and issue the printed plastic card to the reader.
Reader Identification cards are good for two years and must be renewed in person when they expire. Researchers with questions about reader registration may call the Reader Registration Station at (202) 707-5278.
The reader registration system is considered a critical component in the Library's collections security program. It is part of a larger plan to protect the Library's collections that was initiated by the Librarian of Congress, James H. Billington, in March 1992. Other components of that plan include closed stacks, installation of surveillance cameras, electronic control of stack doors, and installation of theft detection targets and detection gates. |
So, I still think you make much up as you go. In any case, is there anything else I can help you with?
No?
Can you, then, please show me how it works in any Middle Eastern country (take your pick)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I spend a lot of time talking with muslims (usually arab, but not always) and they can be very critical of their own countries and culture.
Sadly, I've noticed their respect for the West decline in the past several years due to our meddling in the Middle East (with its horrific consequences for the people living there), and I do not feel I have a right to criticise their countries/culture while mine is clearly so disgracefully flawed. As DD points out, it's up to them to do this. And it's up to us to try and clean up our mess.
One only has to spend a short time surfing the web to find many dissenters from the Arab world and Iran.
Here is just a sample:
One of my favourite bloggers, Big Pharoah, writes:
| Quote: |
| A group of Muslim leaders from around the world have sent a letter to the Pope concerning the speech he gave at the German university. I found the letter to be very interesting and a good step towards dialog. However, even though dialog with the Pope is definitely welcomed, it is not the most important thing right now. What is important is Muslim leaders, the official and unofficial among them, have a dialog among themselves vis-a-vis the current pit Islam is in and how it can get out of it to face the realities of the 21st century. My hope is that they stop preaching to the West and start preaching to each other. That won't happen unless they look in the mirror and realize what's afflicting their religion and then do something about it just as their Christian and Jewish brothers have done. If that won't happen, the clash of civilizations will just continue. |
Another popular blogger is Egyptian Sandmonkey who has this disclaimer on his homepage:
| Quote: |
| Be forewarned: The writer of this blog is an extremely cynical, snarky, pro-US, secular, libertarian, disgruntled sandmonkey. If this is your cup of tea, please enjoy your stay here. If not, please sod off |
He is, as he indicates, very pro Western, and pro-American! Gopher might get a real thrill!
Both these bloggers have links on their websites to many more dissenting muslim blogs, such as this one:
http://freedomforegyptians.blogspot.com/
| Quote: |
Islam's Spokesperson Mahdy Akef of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is telling British leader of the House of the Commons and former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw to "mind his own business".
It is so funny that the MB in Egypt are not politically ambitious at the domestic front, but they appointed themselves to be the official mouthpiece for Islam.
It is needless to say that this is Straw's buisness. If Akef is not accepting women in Bikini, I believe Straw has the right not to accept women covering their faces. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| I spend a lot of time talking with muslims (usually arab, but not always) and they can be very critical of their own countries and culture...One only has to spend a short time surfing the web... |
Citing people you claim to have talked to or cherry-picking amongst English-speaking bloggers on the net does not address the deeper patterns I am referring to in governments and publishing houses, for example.
We all seem to agree that Edward Said speaks with some authority on these matters. When he is not lambasting the Orientalists, here is some of what he has to say about the Arab world itself...
| Said wrote: |
...in all my works I remained fundamentally critical of a gloating and uncritical nationalism...My view of Palestine, forumlated originally in The Question of Palestine, remains the same today: I expressed all sorts of reservations about the insouciant nativism and militant militarism of the nationalist consensus; I suggested instead a critical look at the Arab environment, Palestinian history, and the Israeli realities, with the explicit conclusion that only a negotiated settlement between the two communities of suffering, Arab and Jewish, would provide respite from the unending war. (I should mention in passing that although my book on Palestine was given a fine Hebrew translation in the early 1980s by Mifras, a small Israeli publishing house, it remains untranslated into Arabic to this day. Every Arabic publisher who was interested in the book wanted me to change or delete those sections that were openly critical of one or another Arab regime -- including the PLO -- a request that I have always refused to comply with.)
I regret to say that the Arabic reception of Orientalism, despite Kamal Abu Deeb's remarkable translation, still managed to ignore that aspect of my book which diminished the nationalist fervor that some implied from my critique of Orientalism, which I associated with those drives to domination and control also to be found in imperialism... |
from Orientalism's "Afterword," 337-338.
And where, by the way, is the Arab's world's Edward Said? Is there one?
Last edited by Gopher on Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Next claim: Both Ddeubel and Big_Bird have asserted that what does or does not go on within the Middle East is none of our business; we should mind our own business and stick to our own culture's problems.
First, this is one-sided and therefore invalid (or at least unfarily applied). Everytime someone in the West tells a joke Arabs or Iranians or some other Middle Easterners do not like, they throw a temper tantrum. Same thing for newspaper stories and cartoons. Indeed, Apple, Inc., has apparently felt this wrath, not for any "imperial" activities in the Middle East mind you, but for its own marketing device inside the United States...
Second, this is obsolete thinking and therefore invalid. We live in an increasingly interdependent world, a world of dialog and interaction, across all cultural lines and space.
If we in the West need to learn to better interact with the various peoples and cultures of the Middle East, then they, too would be well-advised to learn to better interact with the various peoples and cultures of the West.
It is our place to tell them this, whether they want to hear it or not. Because, as I said, ultimately, there is one world, we all inhabit it, and we all need to deal with each other and our differences responsibly and, I might add, as adults.
That means talking with them and to them -- again, whether they want to hear it or not -- in addition to listening to them.
We are all at the same table, then, and it does not or at least should not matter who constructed the table or how we came to be here. We should all be talking (and listening). That includes not only the United States and "the West," but the Arab Middle East and others, like the Iranians, as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
It is our place to tell them this, whether they want to hear it or not. Because, as I said, ultimately, there is one world, we all inhabit it, and we all need to deal with each other and our differences responsibly and, I might add, as adults.
That means talking with them and to them -- again, whether they want to hear it or not -- in addition to listening to them. |
But Gopher...time and time again you have asserted that anyone on this forum who comments on US actions, US policy, or criticizes US politics or culture are not making valid comments, but simply indulging in "US bashing".
In comments you've made in the past, re: Canadian perspectives on South American politics, you've said that Canadians are 'head in the sand'-ists and irresponsible, dismissing the possibility that Canadians simply have a different perspective on economic and security issues in that region. You've demanded that non-Americans need to "recognize the US's unique place of power and perspective" in the world, while simultaneously denying the validity of perspectives of people from other countries, including Western ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nambucaveman
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Given the fact some of the comments in this thread can be construed as racists against Muslims, I'm locking it. Some of the flaming has gotten out of control as well. If those that participate in the CE forum are not willing to abide by the rules, it will result in threads being locked.
NC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|