Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

They've banned tag...WTF

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
grainger



Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Wonju, Korea

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:57 am    Post subject: They've banned tag...WTF Reply with quote

Massachusetts school bans playing tag at recess over fears of injuries, lawsuits
10:32:25 EDT Oct 18, 2006
Canadian Press
ATTLEBORO, Mass. (AP) - Tag, you're out!

Officials at an elementary school south of Boston have banned kids from playing tag, touch football and any other unsupervised chase game during recess for fear they'll get hurt and hold the school liable.

Recess is "a time when accidents can happen," said Willett Elementary School principal Gaylene Heppe, who approved the ban.

While there is no districtwide ban on contact sports during recess, local rules have been cropping up. Several school administrators around Attleboro, a city of about 45,000 residents, took aim at dodgeball a few years ago, saying it was exclusionary and dangerous.

Elementary schools in Cheyenne, Wyo., and Spokane, Wash., also recently banned tag during recess. A suburban Charleston, S.C., school outlawed all unsupervised contact sports.

"I think that it's unfortunate that kids' lives are micromanaged and there are social skills they'll never develop on their own," said Debbie Laferriere, who has two children at Willett, about 65 kilometres south of Boston. "Playing tag is just part of being a kid."

Another Willett parent, Celeste D'Elia, said her son feels safer because of the rule. "I've witnessed enough near collisions," she said.


This is the most ridiculus thing I've ever heard. Especially, the last parent: "I've witnessed enough near collisions," she said It's not like they're in cars. I thought childhood was all about scraped knees and elbows. Parents aren't leaving their kids enough room to be kids. They never learn to deal with anything on their own anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PEIGUY



Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Location: Omokgyo

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When will people realize the stupidness of these mistakes? How many generations of CEO's World Leaders played Tag when they were kids or had playground incidents? A kid colliding with another kid? what's next? no shoe laces because they might trip on them? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Novernae



Joined: 02 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PEIGUY wrote:
When will people realize the stupidness of these mistakes? How many generations of CEO's World Leaders played Tag when they were kids or had playground incidents? A kid colliding with another kid? what's next? no shoe laces because they might trip on them? Rolling Eyes


No, I think next they'll start putting everyone in colorless bubbles that will fully protect them from everything including the social stigma of being fat chunks of lard from not doing anything.

BTW OP, you missed this one I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we should not eat. If we eat, we may potentially choke, and that may lead to our death. I never got hurt playing tag. With obesity, at epidemic proportions, this makes as much sense as someone who hates flies placing a bag of trash outside the door. If you play P.E. you could potentially injure yourself. If you take a test, you could potentially fail, and you may have emotional anguish, as a result.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
for fear they'll get hurt and hold the school liable.


This article could be more about the absolutely crazy level of suing that goes on in the US than it is about being over-protective.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ths school banned it because idiots like this like to sue over everything and should have their kids taken from them

Another Willett parent, Celeste D'Elia, said her son feels safer because of the rule. "I've witnessed enough near collisions," she said.

Ths school is doing what is logical: protecting its own ass from idiots who sue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wannago



Joined: 16 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
for fear they'll get hurt and hold the school liable.


This article could be more about the absolutely crazy level of suing that goes on in the US than it is about being over-protective.


Let's take it a step further. It SHOULD be about people who file assinine lawsuits like this and win. If this kind of crap were thrown out and people were charged with filing frivolous lawsuits, less people would file. It's the dollar signs that motivate people, nothing else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wannago wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
for fear they'll get hurt and hold the school liable.


This article could be more about the absolutely crazy level of suing that goes on in the US than it is about being over-protective.


Let's take it a step further. It SHOULD be about people who file assinine lawsuits like this and win. If this kind of crap were thrown out and people were charged with filing frivolous lawsuits, less people would file. It's the dollar signs that motivate people, nothing else.


No, the problem isn't frivolous lawsuits at all. On February 18, 2005, Bush signed legislation that basically banned class action suits on the state level and confined it to the Federal Courts. Getting trials at the Federal level is not easy, and its hard to imagine a clumsier way to keep greedy lawyers down when you deny plenty of merited liability suits to people who suffer from problems companies should have foreseen in their products and services.

Quote:
"There's more to do," Bush said, arguing that medical liability lawsuits are driving up the cost of health care and that asbestos litigation has bankrupted dozens of companies and eliminated thousands of jobs. "I'm confident that this bill will be the first of many bipartisan achievements in the year 2005."


Bush's prediction of the first of many bipartisan agreements (249 to 149 in the House and over 70 Senate votes for it) to come in 2005 is not the only specious claim here. His view that medical liability lawsuits are the cause of health care woes (any investor knows that pharm companies are where its at) is the real problem.

Here is a link to an article and an accompanying study that addresses Bush's claim. The italics are mine, and indicate that upon which real proponents of Tort Reform in the medical malpractice arena should be focusing.

Quote:
[T]he authors found that the claims that did not involve errors absorbed a relatively small piece of the costs of compensation. Eliminating those claims would decrease the system�s compensation and administrative costs by no more than 13% to 16%. �Many of the current tort reform initiatives, such as caps on noneconomic damages, are motivated by a perception that �jackpot� awards in frivolous suits are draining the system,� explained Michelle Mello, an associate professor of health policy and law at HSPH and a co-author of the study. �But nearly 80% of the administrative costs of the malpractice system are tied to resolving claims that have merit. Finding ways to streamline the lengthy and costly processing of meritorious claims should be in the bullseye of reform efforts.�


I bet if you were to compare the amount of frivilous lawsuits in the country versus merited lawsuits, and then adjust that to the rate of frivilous legislation, let's just keep that defined narrowly as pork-barrelling, versus merited legislation (anything not readily identifiable as pork-barrel legislation), I bet the latter ratio would dwarf the former.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International