Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Eating dog meat?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really think Red Dog should be given less sh*t. Hey - don't get me wrong, I despise vegetarians. I think killing and eating animals - all animals - is a moral obligation. Thus I am the polar opposite to RD.

However, RD's view is logically consistent. So is mine - just kill everything and eat it! She doesn't eat ANY animals. She doesn't make a stupid distinction between the systematic torture of animals consumed in the West vis-a-vis the slaying of dogs. She doesn't eat any of them.

It is the so-called people that tuck into a nice steak - from a cow that was castrated whilst alive - with eggs - from hens that had their mouths cut off throughout their truly miserable little lives - with lobster - who were boiled alive..........that we should be opposing. Either you're meat-eater, or you're not! I'd take RD over some stupid *beep* who is a meat-eater yet opposes eating dog (and defends this horribly anti-intellectual point by pointing to the manner of the crreature's death!)

I'm a black and white thinker. Either we should eat ALL animals (SPIN) or we should eat none (RD). Myself and RD - although we are 100% in opposition - are logically, morally superior to the morons who think it's ok to eat a tortured cow, hen, pig, lamb....yet woe betide anyone eating cute little puppies.

I absolutely hate - and I mean REALLY hate - Western peopl who distinguish between the eating of a dog and the eating of a pig (the latter is more intelligent than a dog).

Stop giving RD grief. Seek out the steak eaters who oppose the dog-eaters - fools the lot of them!


Last edited by SPINOZA on Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

red dog wrote:
Guess what, Q -- I "deliberately avoid" talking to you because I don't like you very much. I also don't feel obligated to answer stupid questions.


Laughing

You don't like me very much because I point out how incoherent your world view is. You're not stupid, but you are crazy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SPINOZA wrote:
I really think Red Dog should be given less sh*t. Hey - don't get me wrong, I despise vegetarians. I think killing and eating animals - all animals - is a moral obligation. Thus I am the polar opposite to RD.

However, RD's view is logically consistent. So is mine - just kill everything and eat it! She doesn't eat ANY animals.


Have some more kool-aid, Spinoza!

Just because her actions are consistent with her ideologies does not mean that her view is logically consistent, or in this case, coherent.

I speak specifically of her claim that you can't be a dog lover and dog eater. That's like saying you can't be a plant lover and a vegetarian. Durrrr... Somehow, she's been unable to answer that question, but has commented on why she won't answer it several times, indicating she's aware of the question and also has the time to type out a resonse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kimchieluver



Joined: 02 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I don't mind people eating dogs. I have eaten dog, maybe will again. However I think that people should be aware how they are usually beaten or electrocuted while they are alive just before they are killed. Call me SOFT, but I think there should be a sticky informing noobs that this is common place. Maybe it would change some wayguk minds about the "adventure" of eating dog meat. Call me some f***ing c**t because I know how many would change their minds about eating dog if they knew the BASIC facts about dog meat in Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kimchieluver



Joined: 02 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sample conversation:

Korean:"I want to take you to a special restaurant".

Noob: "Sure".

Korean: " You will try dog meat!".

Noob: "Holy cow! You guys eat that here!"

Korean: "Yes, it increases STAMINA" (which Spinoza and many others are desperately lacking)

Noob: "I think that dogs are special animals, don't you"

Korean: "We don't eat our pets, these are just dogs raised to be eaten".

Noob: "Okay, I always wondered what dog would taste like".

Korean: "And then we will go hiking to a Budhest temple" (just after violating all Budhist laws).

Noob: "Sounds great! I cant think of a better way to waste my Saturday".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kimchieluver



Joined: 02 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sample conversation if a noob was an informed noob:

Korean: " I am going to take you to a special restaurant".

Noob: "Cool, where?".

Korean: "We are going to try dog meat"

Noob: "No, thank you. Lets have sumgetong" (like the pic Spinoza has in his sig line).

OR

Noob: "Sounds good, I always wanted to try dog!" (doesn't give a crap about what Kimchieluver, Spinoza, Red Dog, The Bobster had to say... he/she is exercising free will with an informed opinion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Bobster



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:17 am    Post subject: Re: Pre-slaughter torture? Reply with quote

tabbyfoof wrote:
All I was saying was that people who were arguing about the merits of eating or not eating the meat seemed to be talking about only the death of an animal that many deem only a companion animal as the major reason they would or wouldn't eat dog. And I was saying that that's not the only reason; that people who are meat eaters get icked out when they find out how the dogs are often killed. I've heard people say that they wouldn't have eaten it had they known, and they felt bad, and I'm talking about foreigners.

Excuse what seems like derision, but is not ...

Yawn.

You see, I've also known people who hear about the practices that are common in slaughterhouses and the poultry industry back in our home countries and reacted that same way, to wit, that they would not have eaten it had they known how it died. It's easy to say, makes you look very compassionate and concerned about the fate of other creatures on the planet to utter such stuff at appropriate moments.

Did the addition of such knowledge change their dietary habits with regards to ensuing meals partaken for pleasure and sustenance? No, not within the scope of my observation. They kept eating what they had eaten before, just as I did after I had heard the same facts told to me.

No, I remain skeptical, I'm afraid. I think the real issue is the "companion animal" thing. Dogs are creatures we invite into our homes and invest our love in, treat them as family members, and even entertain the notion they will protect us and die for us (though, if they get hungry enough ... uh, watch out) and the same is not true for chickens, pigs and cattle.

Dogs are different, within the scope of people's thoughts and feelings and attachments about them, at least to those of us from the West, different from other animals, more so even than cats, in my opinion.

I don't own a dog because I live in a big city and have a small apartment, but if I had a large place out in the country I'm pretty sure I'd get a big furry pal to run outdoors with, catch frisbees and have a good strenuous wrassle with out on the lawn. Dogs are cool, once you get to know them and vice versa - generally, that is, and not always in particular cases.

My friends who own dogs (or as some would say, "cohabit with companion animals") are not afraid to let me into their homes and even play with their canine friend who desires me to do so. This is true even though they are aware - though may not approve - that I have consumed the flesh of other members of that species. It is not impossible to keep categories separate within a rational mind, and I prefer to hang out with people who possess minds like these.

I think you have to ask, as I generally do, why people might feel concern about what is inflicted on members of one particular species of animal intended raised only as foodstuff, but not on the many others also used in that way - and the only answer I can come up with is what I have said, that many people have had personal relationships with members of the dog species, but not with the other species commonly eaten ... and that they cannot separate between categories.

Quote:
All I meant was that just because someone eats beef or pork but feels like drawing their own personal line at dogs doesn't make them a hypocrite in my book.

Um, I'm not saying I would consider others to be hypocrites for this - only that I myself would feel I am such.

Quote:
My point was that--that something being considered a companion animal is in the eye of the beholder.

Not sure I can agree that the definition is so fluid as that - see above for what I consider my own : an animal you take into your home, invest love and care in and sometimes consider a member of the family. This is common for dogs, and a few other creatures. People who have had such relationships have feelings so strong about it that it extends outward from the particular instance to all such creatures who resemble it. I just think the thought patterns are fuzzy there, that's all.

An example. Horses are domesticated, and many people love them, even own them and invest emotions for them - are they ever considered a "companion animal?" In rare cases, perhaps yes ... and yet.

On a recent vacation to Jeju I sat down at a restaurant that serves what is called 말 고기* (horse meat). Not only did my dog-owner friends fail to blanche at the thought of it when later told, or ask how humanely the animal was killed, it was - well, simply not interesting in any way. With horse meat, the thing I have noticed which seems most salient here : it is NOT a political issue that gets talked by anyone, no one gets riled over it, not even Brigitte Bardot, nor is it made the punch-lines in Jay Leno monologues or the subject of international outrage or even a topic on message boards.

So - where is the outrage over eating horses in Jeju? If you ever saw any such excitement, please point it out to me ...

Ah, but horses are not dogs, are they?

In the interests of inflicting a little more pain into a discussion mostly about it, I'd like to mention that I once ate a steak made from dolphin while on vacation in Florida, though I assure you it was entirely by accident ... um, at least, I can say that it was not on porpoise.

I'll await whatever punishment I deserve for that last paragraph ...

_______

* Feel free to correct my spelling again ... lol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flotsam



Joined: 28 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kimchieluver wrote:


Korean: "And then we will go hiking to a Budhest temple" (just after violating all Budhist laws).



How does someone manage writing a sentence like this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kimchieluver wrote:
Sample conversation if a noob was an informed noob:

Korean: " I am going to take you to a special restaurant".

Noob: "Cool, where?".

Korean: "We are going to try dog meat"

Noob: "No, thank you. Lets have sumgetong" (like the pic Spinoza has in his sig line).
OR

Noob: "Sounds good, I always wanted to try dog!" (doesn't give a crap about what Kimchieluver, Spinoza, Red Dog, The Bobster had to say... he/she is exercising free will with an informed opinion


(dear oh dear, see bold)

Might be an idea if you learnt AT LEAST elementary Korean. I have never heard of a Korean dish - a Han Sheek - called Sumgetong (숨게통) and it certainly isn't the dish in my sig. That's Samgyetang (삼계탕) and is indeed most deeleeshos-ugh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Qinella wrote:
SPINOZA wrote:
I really think Red Dog should be given less sh*t. Hey - don't get me wrong, I despise vegetarians. I think killing and eating animals - all animals - is a moral obligation. Thus I am the polar opposite to RD.

However, RD's view is logically consistent. So is mine - just kill everything and eat it! She doesn't eat ANY animals.


Have some more kool-aid, Spinoza!

Just because her actions are consistent with her ideologies does not mean that her view is logically consistent, or in this case, coherent.

I speak specifically of her claim that you can't be a dog lover and dog eater. That's like saying you can't be a plant lover and a vegetarian. Durrrr... Somehow, she's been unable to answer that question, but has commented on why she won't answer it several times, indicating she's aware of the question and also has the time to type out a resonse.


You seem to have missed something, or maybe you're attacking the wrong person. The words you keep quoting over and over again aren't mine. Many pages ago, I objected to the bizarre statement that there was no contradiction between the attitudes "do what you can to help animals wherever you are" and "try a new kind of animal flesh wherever you go." What's controversial about that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many people do consider horses companion animals and object to their slaughter.

http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/equine_protection/get_the_facts_on_horse_slaughter.html

http://www.hr857.com/

This is just an FYI ... I don't necessarily think singling out horses for special protection is a good strategy for animal welfarists. But I am very surprised that the Bobster thought no one in the world cared about horses. What he doesn't seem to understand is that sometimes compassion starts with animals who are closer to us, but as we learn more we can work on becoming more consistent and showing more respect for other animals too.

And yes, some people do change their eating habits because of the cruelty inflicted on chickens, cows and pigs. When I first started avoiding meat as a teenager, my main concern was the fact that they're slaughtered to feed us at all. But learning about the extreme cruelty of factory farm practices definitely strengthened my resolve and helped me take the next steps. I'm sure my experience isn't unique.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red dog,
should we also stop riding horses. Seriously, while not as bad as being eaten, it's still pretty bad. Imagine your life being devoted to being ridden (not sexual jokes, please). They weren't made that way, we breeded it into them. So if we can't breed animals for food, we should breed them for that either, right? And then, where does it stop?

Though I agree with vegetarianism for health reasons, I see no difference between eating a plant and an animal. We can just relate with the animal as it shows more qualites we know and have. I don't know if you will understand that bolded statment though, many aren't capable of thinking outside the box like that. I don't agree with inhumane ways of raising plants or animals though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

L: Although I am very curious about these "inhumane ways of raising plants," I don't think I have the patience for that discussion. I'm comfortable drawing the line between plants and animals, and I think it's a much more rational place to draw it than between the human species and all other species on the planet. Maybe some day I'll understand your perspective better, but right now it just seems like an excuse for apathy.

As I've said before, I oppose the breeding of all domesticated animals, horses included. I see no problem with people riding their own horse companions, if the horses are tame enough and the humans are committed to caring for them for life. I do have a problem with the buying and selling of horses, many of whom will end up at the slaughterhouse as a result. If people have enough space, money and expertise to care for a horse, they should rescue horses who would otherwise be slaughtered. They shouldn't support breeders.

B: It's nice that people feel safe trusting you with their dogs. All this means is that you're not a thief and you respect the "property rights" of the dogs' guardians. I never said you were a thief, just a speciesist who twists the truth to discredit legitimate ideas you don't happen to agree with. The animal protection movement in Korea isn't a "foreign" movement. Korean animal advocates rejected proposed changes to the country's animal protection law because the proposals weren't good enough ... I don't know how you think you can attack their motives when you don't know anything about them or the work they do.

Also, I think I've already responded to the very nasty and defamatory insinuations you directed against me (yet again, knowing full well that many people don't read threads in their entirety and that some people might just assume -- wrongly -- that your statements were based on something I've said). You're the one who has made generalizations about an entire ethnic group, and I know your generalizations are inaccurate because I've met Koreans who don't think like you.


Last edited by red dog on Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:46 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

flotsam wrote:
Kimchieluver wrote:


Korean: "And then we will go hiking to a Budhest temple" (just after violating all Budhist laws).



How does someone manage writing a sentence like this?


We've all written a few sloppy sentences in our time, haven't we? Is that your real concern here or do you have something to add? I'm sure I've violated some Buddhist laws here on these forums, but at least I don't go around calling myself a Buddhist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flotsam



Joined: 28 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

red dog wrote:
flotsam wrote:
Kimchieluver wrote:


Korean: "And then we will go hiking to a Budhest temple" (just after violating all Budhist laws).



How does someone manage writing a sentence like this?


We've all written a few sloppy sentences in our time, haven't we? Is that your real concern here or do you have something to add? I'm sure I've violated some Buddhist laws here on these forums, but at least I don't go around calling myself a Buddhist.


See?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 10 of 18

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International