|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:05 pm Post subject: Camera buying... help |
|
|
In 2004 I went and got my first digi-cam, a good starter's camera for a song (Nikkon 3200) in the electronics district in Seoul (can no longer remember where). The guy gave me peporo sticks, a few bottles of vita-drinks, some little congratulatory ceremony, popped a little paper-roll party-popper, and clinked my vita-drink glass, all over the counter. I really felt initiated into something.
Anyway, the camera has been great but my composition skills have improved a lot and I think I'm ready to move onto a camera with more than 3.2megapixel power. And I'm wondering 1) what that stabilizer feature in new cameras is called in Korean (where it keeps the picture steady if you move, reducing out-of-focus smudge); 2) if you can choose an object in a digicam picture to have sharp focus on, at the expense of other things in the picture.
I'm at the beginning end of my homework on next-step-up cameras, but since the market can only be Seoul I'd gratefully receive constructive suggestions from this forum on good camera models to look at buying, and where in the Seoul area.
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
1) what that stabilizer feature in new cameras is called in Korean (where it keeps the picture steady if you move, reducing out-of-focus smudge); |
No idea what its called in Korean but actually what I will say applies to point #2. Get a Digital SLR. The reason ebing is that with a good DSLR you will be able to buy fast lenses which combined with little noise at high iso values will give you exposure times fast enough that you wont need image stabilizers.
Quote: |
2) if you can choose an object in a digicam picture to have sharp focus on, at the expense of other things in the picture. |
Again, get a DSLR because no, you cannot. I suppose you mean you want to be able to get effects like this:
And the answer is that you wont with a compact. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rich76
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd guess that a DSLR is not quite what you are ready for, however there are some excellent DSLR-type cameras available that are the next step up from a compact camera.
Particularly, look at the Fuji S9100 and Samsung Pro815. These cameras are excellent quality and have fixed lens ranging from 28mm-300mm. The sensor and the lenses are not as good as good as a DSLR but they are much cheaper and really the difference isn't noticible except in certain conditions. You can buy one at Yongsan market for about 600,000 won. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darkness
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dont mean to hijack this thread....but! lol
I'm buying a SLR camera before I leave canada, can i get cheap lenses in korea? I was told electronics are not really cheaper there...
Get and SLR!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks folks,
I think the Fuji looks like the best so far at 9mpixels. It's anti-camera shake is a scene setting called anti-blur (I thought it would universally apply, guess it doesn't) but the memory card is a paltry 16mb!
My Nikkon Coolpix has a 256 mb card that came with it. Are these memory cards very different from each other? I wonder if I could plug in my Nikkon coolpix memory card into a new slr camera? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
vox wrote: |
thanks folks,
I think the Fuji looks like the best so far at 9mpixels. It's anti-camera shake is a scene setting called anti-blur (I thought it would universally apply, guess it doesn't) but the memory card is a paltry 16mb!
My Nikkon Coolpix has a 256 mb card that came with it. Are these memory cards very different from each other? I wonder if I could plug in my Nikkon coolpix memory card into a new slr camera? |
Memory cards are CHEAP. I bought a 1 gig SD chip for my cam and if I remember correctly paid about 40k won or so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Card prices are collapsing fast! 40,000w gets you 2GB now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to try your hand at DSLR, you should take a look at the Canon Kiss/XT or Nikon D50/D70s as a starter.
If you don't want to go that far then there is the panasonic which looks like a DSLR but is still a prosumer camera, ie. very easy to use. The Leica lens on it are very good. Nikon also sell some very nice prosumer cameras (coolpix) which has some of the best LCD screens I've ever seen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the thing about D-SLRs. There are at least five D-70s owned by teachers at my school. During the big school events, they all come out and it's like a Nikon convention. They've got great lenses to go with them, flashy tripods - serious gear. There's another guy with a Canon Rebel - same thing applies.
Their photos suck. Bad color, strange focusing, severe exposure problems.
Those cameras are capable of taking amazing pictures - far beyond what my camera could ever contemplate. But they're so complicated for a newbie, they're also capable of taking disastrous pictures. And none of those guys have had the time or motivation to learn to use what they have. This is combined with a serious amount of expendable income which makes it possible for them to blow thousands of dollars on gear they don't understand. If it was me, I'd learn the camera inside and out, just to get my money's worth. They're not me.
My cheesy HP 8x zoom camera ended up taking most of the pictures for the school yearbook, though those guys submitted hundreds of pictures to the editor of the various events.
Recommending a D-SLR should come with the caveat that you need to invest quite a bit of time into experimentation and learning to use the tool. Those guys would have been better off buying a decent prosumer camera. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Missile Command Kid
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, lenses are *not* cheaper here than they are back home. If you've got some time before you leave, I'd strongly recommend ordering from B&H Photo and Video in New York. I know you said you're from Canada, but so am I, and their prices for lenses beat pretty much any Canadian company I looked at. I'm kicking myself for not picking up a Nikon 12-24 DX lens before I left for SK, as it's several hundred dollars more expensive here.
I bought my Nikon D50 from http://www.camera-warehouse.ca/ - great price at the time, free shipping, no PST. No PST alone can save you $50-75, depending on what kind of camera you're buying. Free shipping is icing on the cake.
DSLR cameras are pretty easy to figure out, but one of the most underrated aspects of any photographer's tool kids (for newbies, anyway) is a decent tripod. Sure, a DSLR can take great shots during the day, but at night or in low light conditions it's impossible to take good pictures without a tripod. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
indytrucks

Joined: 09 Apr 2003 Location: The Shelf
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Lemon wrote: |
Here's the thing about D-SLRs. There are at least five D-70s owned by teachers at my school. During the big school events, they all come out and it's like a Nikon convention. They've got great lenses to go with them, flashy tripods - serious gear. There's another guy with a Canon Rebel - same thing applies.
Their photos suck. Bad color, strange focusing, severe exposure problems.
|
Tell me about it. In Korea, where image plays a big part in a lot of things (look at the way they deck themselves out for a Sunday afternoon hike), the adjosshis out to take photos are sometimes laughable. Jinju Lantern Festival was a good example. The amount of guys I saw running around with their Lowepro backpacks and Manfrotto or Gitzo composite tripods which must have cost a fortune and their L telephotos made me want to puke ... because you just knew they had little idea what they were doing, just by watching. Bad light. Boring subjects. A real bunch of showoffs. I have/had to scrimp and save for ages to buy the glass I want, and these guys are flashing around a tripod that costs more than my car. Not to mention the glass ... lenses that you need/I could really use for shooting birds or wildlife reserved for snapping their kids waving the "V" sign, standing in front of a water fountain.
Life isn't fair. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hepcat

Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have to disagree with those on this thread that say you "need" a DSLR. There are professionals, even, who have only used fixed lens cameras for major assignments. DSLRs are "needed" for studio, sports and wildlife photography, and other even more specialized WORK. "Want" is another matter. If you like to buy and play with lots of lenses and accessories, that's great. But it's a hobby, a very expensive hobby.
If you want quality at a good price, I'd recommend my three main cameras:
1) Sony DSC-R1 - It's not perfect but, "if you can live within its 24-120mm effective focal length range, the combination of lens and camera can't be equalled for less than three or four times its selling price of $999. [actually, it now goes for under 800,000 won] Easily a Dave's Pick, we'd like to see a quicker shutter response, faster shot to shot speed, and especially a larger buffer memory, but there's literally nothing on the market that can touch it for optical quality for less than $3,000 or so. (For camera and lenses combined.)"
quoted from: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/R1/R1A13.HTM
I love that camera. The lens--good lord!
2) Canon A640 -- I love this camera , too. I've had it for about 3 weeks (it was just released) and I couldn't be happier with it as an outdoor shooter, take anywhere camera. Sharp lens, great macro, flip/twist screen, fast operation, fantastic color/exposure, 10 MP. Full manual or auto controls. I've already shot some of my all-time favorite shots with it.
3) Fuji F30 -- I bought this in the late spring. It's my low-light take anywhere shooter. Sharp lens, industry-leading sensor. The A640 is grainy above 400 iso, but the Fuji goes to 1600 iso very smoothly. It has no full manual control, and the exposure outdoors is trickier than the Canon, but I'll be keeping this camera for years for all kinds of low-light purposes (indoor people shots, markets at night). Very well-built and tremendous battery life.
Last edited by hepcat on Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:45 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Callan
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
You should consider also that you might want to grow into the camera. If you get a camera that does what you can do now, there you go. But if you get a camera that can do all that and more, then you have someplace to go.
I recommend a DSLR if you are ready to do some reading and figure it out. You can sit on the "Auto" mode for a while until your ready to fly and you've got the old camera to fall back on. With a DSLR it isn't "Darn, I wish I could get that shot" its "I wonder HOW I get that shot". And cards being as cheap as they are, you can take 20 shots of the same thing making little adjustments and really see what changes. There's really nothing better to learn with.
The fixed-lens jobbies that were mentioned could be good as well. But I'd make sure the lens was spot on before I bought one. You don't want to be stuck with slow glass.
That said, if you just want to point and shoot...then get a point and shoot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Callan
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, and check this site out : http://www.dpreview.com/
I strongly recommend doing some reading (well, some more reading) before dropping the cash. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
vox wrote: |
thanks folks,
I think the Fuji looks like the best so far at 9mpixels. It's anti-camera shake is a scene setting called anti-blur (I thought it would universally apply, guess it doesn't) but the memory card is a paltry 16mb! |
That Fuji anti-blur is quite a different animal from real image stabilization. It's basically cleaner, less noisy high ISO performance, which permits faster shutter speeds than the light would normally allow you. This is in some cases better than image stabilization because it reduces blur related to subject movement as well as camera shake.
However, the Fuji CCD still has heavy noise over ISO800, which limits how far you can push the sensitivity of the CCD to get fast speeds in lower light.
Proper image stabilization involves a system of moving the lens or the CCD minutely at the moment of exposure to compensate for camera movement, and allows for longer exposures without a tripod. It doesn't do anything to reduce subject movement blur, which is actually made worse by the longer exposure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|