View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:32 am Post subject: Voting Machines� Venezuela Ties |
|
|
Ohhhhh, this isn't going to go away.
Say Hello! to the 'hanging chads' of 2006.
Quote: |
U.S. Investigates Voting Machines� Venezuela Ties
By TIM GOLDEN
The federal government is investigating the takeover last year of a leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company that has been linked to the leftist Venezuelan government of President Hugo Ch�vez. |
www.washingtonpost.com
If the Dems take the either the House or Senate, this will be the Republicans excuse... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, most of you know I'm not a cosnpiracy hound, but I would appreciate it if someone in the know could answer this question...
Why exactly was it so urgent to switch to electronic voting? Hadn't hand-counted paper ballots served the USA well for centuries? As far as I can tell, all e-voting does is make the counting process inexplicable to the layman, and make it less easy to refute the conspiracy theorists.
So. Why did they switch to electronic voting? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Meegook

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Okay, most of you know I'm not a cosnpiracy hound, |
You are if you bought into the conspiracy that '19 Arabs with boxccutters' were behind 9/11.
Easier to manipulate the vote counting.
This electronic ballot box tie-in to Chavez is obvious propaganda. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Meegook wrote: |
On the Other Hand wrote: |
I'm not a conspiracy hound... |
You are if you bought into the conspiracy that '19 Arabs with boxccutters' were behind 9/11... |
Here we go... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
E voting, is just a small part of the problem. The real problems are the electronic scanners that count the paper ballots, gerrymandering (sp?) and disenfranchisement. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Meegook wrote:
On the Other Hand wrote:
I'm not a conspiracy hound...
You are if you bought into the conspiracy that '19 Arabs with boxccutters' were behind 9/11...
Here we go...
|
Okay, I guess Meegook believes in the alleged conspiracy to steal elections, and Gopher doesn't. All well and good, but would someone be able to answer my question?
Quote: |
Why did they switch to electronic voting?
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Okay, I guess Meegook believes in the alleged conspiracy to steal elections, and Gopher doesn't. All well and good, but would someone be able to answer my question?
Quote: |
Why did they switch to electronic voting?
|
|
OK, I'll try to answer your question.
First we would need to know whether this was a national-level decision, a state-wide decision, or something that some but not all local registrars are doing -- voluntarily and for local reasons. If not, was it a response to the 2000 debacle in Florida? If not this, then was it merely just a modernization move? An update in the system? I really do not know the answers to these questions. Now, however, I am interested to find out and will ask someone in poly-sci this week.
Last week, however, I voted in my state, and in the usual way -- that is, by early mail-in ballot, which my registrar had mailed to me. I filled it out by hand, signed it, and put it in the USPS. And that was that. Indeed, the state where I reside has a measure on its ballots asking voters to decide whether it should adopt a mail-in system for everyone, for every election, starting with the next one, and purely as a matter of convenience (it will eliminate having to take time off work and it will eliminate waiting in line, etc.). There is no talk or any evidence whatsoever for an electronic voting system coming on-line here, however.
And as far as everyone I know who does not vote early, and in two pretty major states and one minor state -- one of them California -- they will go to their usual polling places and cast their usual, written ballots. Nothing electronic at all here, on the ground, where I cannot fathom why so many ex-pat Americans, and Australians, Britishers, and Canadians in Korea are so sure there are gross irregularities and conspiracies afoot here... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? Hmm..maybe all us freaky wagukins from Kanukistan get those ideas from things like this.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003315816
Gallup: Only 1 in 4 Americans Very Confident Votes Will Be Counted Accurately
By E&P Staff
Published: October 27, 2006 9:55 AM ET
NEW YORK Gallup reports today, less than two weeks from the midterm elections, that a new poll finds that only about one in four Americans are "very confident" that votes across the country will be accurately cast and counted and that workers at voting facilities will be capable of resolving any problems. "The public places equal trust in electronic or computerized ballots and paper ballots to correctly record its votes this year," Gallup relates.
"Republicans and Democrats differ in their overall confidence in the country's voting system, with Republicans much more likely than Democrats to express confidence in the accuracy of the vote counts, in the workers at polling facilities, and in the trustworthiness of electronic ballots."
The overall number expressing a high degree of confidence, in the poll taken Oct. 20-22, is 28%, with 4 in 10 Republicans very confident versus only 17% of Democrats. Republicans also express more faith in electronic ballots than Democrats. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Meegook

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I guess Meegook believes in the alleged conspiracy to steal elections |
All it takes is a few hours of serious inquiry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
So there you have it, On the Other Hand. The conspiracy theorists and I have weighed in on the voting issue and "electronic ballots."
I guess you can take it or leave it as you find it... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not want to really comment on the hijackers except to say that you can make a weapon out of many things. People who are trained with paramilitary tactics in camps can figure out ways to harm people.
The person who doesn't believe Arab hijackers did it believes either the U.S. government did it for certain political objectives or the Israelis did it because they wanted more Americans to become anti-Arab.
The current administration is looking into these ballots. It is kind of interesting considering many of the machines are owned by people who have been, at least in the past, quite friendly to the Bush administration, adn we have no paper trail or sure-fire-way to ensure the vote is legitimate. This is not conspiracy theory talking. I have read of computer programmers saying there were serious holes in the software.
I believe there was also a whistle blower on top of that. I used to think it was ridiculous to believe that the vote could be tampered with in Ohio.
Before computers were around, elections were tampered with, and it can happen after the use of computers.
You should not have voting machines owned by partisans counting votes.
You should have people made up equally from two parties tabulating, counting things. That is the only way to go. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|