View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:15 am Post subject: The contempt for human life starts with the lives of Arabs.. |
|
|
...and ends with the lives of Jews.
by Gideon Levy
The Haaretz
A bloodbath is taking place in Beit Hanun, the Israel Defense Forces runs rampant and kills at least 37 people in four days - and Israeli public opinion yawns with indifference. A brigade commander tells his soldiers, who killed 12 people in one day: "You've won 12:0," and the soldiers grin broadly. This is the moral nadir we have reached, following a long slide down a slippery slope: Human life has become cheap.
...
What a long way we have come since the talk, as hypocritical as it may have been, about "the purity of arms." This concept has been totally deleted from the lexicon. What a long way we have come since the time when we took pride in the fact that, unlike the Arabs, we tried not to kill innocent civilians. And now we have arrived at the shocking reality of the second Lebanon war. For example, the number of people Israel killed is not only almost 10 times higher than the number of people Hezbollah killed, but the number of soldiers Hezbollah killed is three times higher than the number of Israeli civilians they killed, while the number of Lebanese civilians killed by Israel is about three times the number of Hezbollah fighters. So whose arms are purer? A journalist from The Guardian who is currently in Israel was shocked to hear that these figures have not been the subject of public discussion here.
...
No one asked who these fatalities were, whether they all deserved to die, and what benefit Israel derives from this wholesale killing. Beyond the terrifying number of civilians killed, including dozens of women and children, we should also ask whether every armed person in Gaza - and there are tens of thousands of them - deserves the death penalty, without a trial. The day the IDF began the targeted assassinations, our sensitivity to human life was doomed to be erased.
...
The daily killing in Gaza receives scant mention. Futile operations aimed at restoring the IDF's lost honor do not arouse any debate about their aim, morality or chances of succeeding. No one wonders about the extent of Qassam damage versus the extent of the killing and destruction - including the bombing of the power station - in Gaza, where a million and a half people are encaged, impoverished and hungry.
These futile operations will not stop the Qassams, which are aimed at giving us and the rest of the world a painful reminder of the imprisoned and boycotted Gaza residents' distress, which no one would notice if it were not for the Qassams.
For full article click here
This is a sad state of affairs. There seems to be little soul searching amongst the Israeli populace - with only a few journalists (such as Levy) willing to examine the morality of what's going on in the occupied territories. And as Israel's complicit allies - what are we doing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spliff

Joined: 19 Jan 2004 Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you yourself, actually have anything to say? Or is this some sort of news blog?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
spliff wrote: |
Do you yourself, actually have anything to say? Or is this some sort of news blog?  |
Clearly a lot more than you my friend. If you've got something to say about the subject let's hear it. Otherwise....bugger off! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
All through history civilians have been casualties of war.
Well maybe the Romans were a little more careful in the battle field.
But once they got to the loot it was another story.
The point is if you look at the Crusades for instance civilians were purposely put in harms way. It is a tactic that works and erodes the enemies will. Mohamed used this tactic with great effect. The use of civilians and servents to infiltrate, seduce, mesmerize and conquer on an individual level is a particular art and skill of the Mohamedan warrior.
I think the modern warrior would like to think they chivalrous in some kind of "purity of arms" honor. But, in the end war is the business of breaking things and killing people.
Occupation is the real crime of war. It puts the warrior in a position that will ultimately lead to compromising any honor code. Only in occupation can the tactic of the Mohamedan warrior be effective.
The strategy that should be employed against this form of warfare is to develop a plan define the mission objectives, attack accomplish the objective and retreat. The mission should not include occupation and should be military in nature. The politics should be left to the politicians.
The argumnet then is, now this enemy will attack at my soveriegnty time and again with infiltrating suicide attacks and missle attacks. I say endure this as political reality for a time, pinpoint the origination infiltrate your enemy covertly without engagement. Gather your evidence to include in objective of your next attack. In the meantime always negotiate from the position of strength.
Do not commit horrors, eating your enemy is wrong.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
One look at the title and you can see that the persective of the author is all out of whack... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What do you mean by out of whack please be more specific.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The title is idiotic in it's simplistic reductionionism, it's a huge exageration, it shows a biased agenda, it's sensationalist, it's shrill and desperate and manilipulative. One look at the title and you know it's not going to be a balanced, sane, and deeply thought-through peice, and low and behold it was not... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Satori wrote: |
One look at the title and you can see that the persective of the author is all out of whack... |
That's a very nice thesis, but it's not in fact the title that the author (Levy) chose for his article, which was in fact titled "Listen to Maj. Gen. Stern"
I chose that line from his article for the thread title - because a thread needs a 'sexy' title if it's going to have any kind of audience on this forum (there is relatively little traffic but always plenty of new threads).
Question: If I'd titled the thread Listen to Maj. Gen. Stern, would you have looked? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Secondly, Levy is an Israeli critcising his own society, which he feels does have contempt for the lives of Arabs. Sadly, I don't see anything 'whacky' about his observation, having myself clocked up many an hour listening to various Israelis discussing their opinions of Arabs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I chose that line from his article for the thread title - because a thread needs a 'sexy' title if it's going to have any kind of audience on this forum (there is relatively little traffic but always plenty of new threads).
Question: If I'd titled the thread Listen to Maj. Gen. Stern, would you have looked? |
IOW....SUCKER!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Arabs at times seem to have disdain for Human life in general.
In the days of Salidad things were quite different.
It was the Assassins that changed the Arab world it started as a cult.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbclark4 wrote: |
The Arabs at times seem to have disdain for Human life in general.
|
Hmmmm.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
And THE quote is out of context.
Is the cult of Assassins still alive in the Arab world state your point here.
Is this not true. Was not Osama named for the prince of the Assassins.
Is the word assassin not of Arab origin.
I am countering the Original Post with historical fact.
State your case.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually you're quite right big bird. Muslims are wonderful people. I was wrong. I hope you all enjoy your first enforced call to prayers at the mosque and bring up the kids to love allah and blow themselves up for him.
I see you have made your decision, and its time to get on the winning side. I was under the illusion westerners were able to detect right and wrong. Clearly this is not the case, and its time I stopped isolating myself and join the majority who want to see the west go under shariah law. My apologies. Lets remove the last ally and bastiojn of freedom in the middle east, and proceed with declaring the west part of the caliphate. Then we can call ourselves civilised politically correct people. I've changed my tune,mass muder is a good thing and I agree with you all. Lets do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Secondly, Levy is an Israeli critcising his own society, which he feels does have contempt for the lives of Arabs. |
Im sure many of them do and Im also equally sure that many palistinians have contempt for the lives of israelis. It's the starts with this and ends with that stuff tips us off that balance and objectivity are not a big feature of this article. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|