View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:03 pm Post subject: Australia VS New Zealand |
|
|
I'm not from either of these countries, but would like to visit both. However, money being the problem that it is, I probably need to choose.
What experiences have you had visiting these countries and what did you enjoy the most? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: Re: Australia VS New Zealand |
|
|
Dev wrote: |
I'm not from either of these countries, but would like to visit both. However, money being the problem that it is, I probably need to choose.
What experiences have you had visiting these countries and what did you enjoy the most? |
apples and oranges mate!!
Ive lived in both! and have traveled both..
both are great countries, and both offer difference experiences
you on a shoestring?
Do NZ find some back packers , rent a car and camp the country from north to south..
Australia pick up some work picking! and make your way around Australia |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aussie is cheaper to get to from Korea but more expensive on the ground.
NZ vice-versa.
Aussie is big so travelling costs are more than NZ that is compat.
However Aussie has a good budget airline thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Natalia
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
They are countries you go to for the scenery rather than for the (lack of) culture. (I'm allowed to say that because it's my neck of the woods!)
And as far as the scenery is concerned, they are so incredibly different it is going to come down to personal preference. There's a reason so many people do both in one trip.
Australia is incredibly big and ridiculously expensive to travel in. It is cheaper for Australians to travel to Asia to holiday rather than going somewhere in their own country. But it is also a unique place as far as scenery and nature goes. New Zealand - landscape-wise - is far more like Europe.
Despite what people may try to tell you, there are a lot of similarities between people in the two cultures.
Why do you have to choose? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hotpants
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, you can't possibly cover both at the same time unless you have at least several months to spare. I was in Australia for a year, and I disagree that it's expensive to travel in. I thought it was much cheaper than going around Europe, for example. You can buy a Greyhound bus ticket around Oz for a couple of hundred dollars, then staying in hostels can be as low as 6 dollars a night. Renting longterm in a homestay was just 60 dollars a week for me. Food from the supermarkets is an inexpensive way to eat. It took me about 3 months to get around and see all the sights.
Australia is more for the beach goer. New Zealand is more for the rugged mountain experience. (Although Australia does have plenty of hiking inland options). Australia is also much warmer. Anywhere north of Brisbane requires only a t-shirt all year round. New Zealand on the other hand gets pretty cold.
Flights out of Australia were more expensive than going in. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wormholes101

Joined: 11 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An Englishman goes to Australia with his wife; they stay in a 5 star hotel and hire a limo for the day. While driving along the road, his wife asks, "Look! What is that man doing with that kangaroo?" The man replies, "My God! Don't look, it's disgusting!"
Further down the road the wife says, "Look, another one!" and the husband says, "Disgusting! I shall report this when we get back to the hotel."
They arrive back at the hotel only to find a man with one wooden leg indulging in "self-abuse" on the steps of the hotel. The husband charges in and says to the manager, "Look, we come here in good faith, to stay in your 5 star hotel and what happens? We are driving down the road and we come across a drover in copulation with a kangaroo. Further on, recurrence of the same thing. Then we get back here only to find a man with one wooden leg, masturbating on your front steps. Well, what do you have to say about that?"
The manager says, 'S'truth mate, you expect a man with one leg to catch his own kangaroo?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheba
Joined: 16 May 2005 Location: Here there and everywhere!
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AirNZ has daily specials, national flights for as low as $20 one way. Date and city restrcitions apply, but if youre flexible in your itinerary, it can be a really cheap way to travel.
www.airnz.co.nz
VirginBlue is an Aussie airline company that has cheap travel nationally, and they do trips between OZ and NZ as well. Freedomair (NZ) is the cheapest airline between the 2 countries, but they dont do national flights.
NZ is more beautiful and has a lot of adventure sports, hiking, and cultural activites, Ive heard kayaking with the dolphins to be a big hilight, and you'd have to visit Milford Sound and Christchurch (so beautiful)! NZ is also much smaller so you can see what there is to offer in a shorter time. Im not sure what the trasport is like in Aussie but its not that great in NZ. Transport within cities and between major cities is ok, but anywhere else youll need to hire a car.
Aussie has shopping, nightlife, themeparks, beaches, and is much warmer. My favorite place there is Surfers Paradise - 4 theme paks, Dracuals Cabaret Restaurant, and beautiful beaches. However, Aussie is a huge country with a big desert, can take forever to get from one place to another.
Aussie sounds cheaper, but with the exchange rate the turn out about the same price for most things...
If you have time Id recommend seeing both countries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wormholes101

Joined: 11 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
sheba wrote: |
Im not sure what the trasport is like in Aussie but its not that great in NZ. Transport within cities and between major cities is ok, but anywhere else youll need to hire a car. |
Well, you could hire a car but like the smarter independent travellers, you could also buy a cheap dunger car from the auctions and travel for virtually free. I was in the auctions buying my car a few years back and saw two Scandanivains pick up an old wreck (but roadworthy) station wagon for NZ$150! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds to me, if you're looking for a couple of weeks checking out a city and maybe some beach time, go to Australia.
But want to see some amazing nature and do some exploring, New Zealand has the upper hand.
Thanks for your opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
candide
Joined: 03 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
What about the locals? I find Australians don't have that chip on their shoulders like New Zealanders do and are much more pleasant to be around (in general).
That said, they are both countries that I think would be great to visit, however I do think Australia would be a lot more fun as it is bigger and a lot more advanced than New Zealand. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
candide wrote: |
What about the locals? I find Australians don't have that chip on their shoulders like New Zealanders do and are much more pleasant to be around (in general).
That said, they are both countries that I think would be great to visit, however I do think Australia would be a lot more fun as it is bigger and a lot more advanced than New Zealand. |
What are you talking about? We've had colour TV in NZ for at least, oh, 10 years!! We even have street lights in most of the major cities (although we have to turn them off at 9pm because they use too much electricity) and we have generally been known to bathe at least once a week, although I can't speak for North Islanders... still, that's better than Australia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xtchr
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
candide wrote: |
however I do think Australia would be a lot more fun as it is bigger . |
Yes, travel is actually just a maths equation.
big geographical territory = more fun
small geographical territory = less fun
Don't ever go to Luxembourg. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheba
Joined: 16 May 2005 Location: Here there and everywhere!
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
candide wrote: |
What about the locals? I find Australians don't have that chip on their shoulders like New Zealanders do and are much more pleasant to be around (in general).
That said, they are both countries that I think would be great to visit, however I do think Australia would be a lot more fun as it is bigger and a lot more advanced than New Zealand. |
What are you talking about? We've had colour TV in NZ for at least, oh, 10 years!! We even have street lights in most of the major cities (although we have to turn them off at 9pm because they use too much electricity) and we have generally been known to bathe at least once a week, although I can't speak for North Islanders... still, that's better than Australia. |
Im from the north island, and we definately bathe more than once a week... in the summer. Bit more warmer up that ways. Except if you live in the wops, then its still just once a week in the summer plus a dip in the creek on the occassion. Youll have to excuse me now, my record player is skipping and there are some natives running around outside clubbing my chickens. Ill should jump in my canoe and paddle over to Australia and ask for some professional help, seeing as I dont have a car to drive on that bridge that joins Sydney to Auckland...... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheba
Joined: 16 May 2005 Location: Here there and everywhere!
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dev wrote: |
Sounds to me, if you're looking for a couple of weeks checking out a city and maybe some beach time, go to Australia.
But want to see some amazing nature and do some exploring, New Zealand has the upper hand.
Thanks for your opinion. |
Yep you've summed it up pretty nicely!
If you go to NZ and want any advice let me know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wormholes101

Joined: 11 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
candide wrote: |
What about the locals? I find Australians don't have that chip on their shoulders like New Zealanders do and are much more pleasant to be around (in general).
That said, they are both countries that I think would be great to visit, however I do think Australia would be a lot more fun as it is bigger and a lot more advanced than New Zealand. |
You have a lot to learn if you think that is a clever troll.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|