| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Matt_22
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm an American who can usually be described as socially liberal, and I wish they would bring back the draft. I'm a young guy too, and would probably be drafted myself, but I think it's high time something like that is enacted. For many reasons.
1) Many Americans have no real tie or feeling for their own country. They just view it as the society and land in which they live in, not the country to which they loyally serve, protect and sustain. If millions of young people are pushed into service abroad, they will be able to see the world around them, begin to appreciate the country they grew up in, and it will give them a sense of responsibility to serve and better their own country. Hell, it would probably increase voter turnout even.
2) It would foster equality. This would only work if the draft were enacted to include everyone at random - no copouts for college, being rich, being a girl, etc. Politicians would be much more careful with their decisions if they knew they might be sending their own son or daughter into a place like Al-Anbar.
3) It could improve international relations. With millions of young civilians drafted, the government could send many conscientious objectors on other non-violent missions. This could be similar to the Peace Corps in nature, and dumping hundreds of thousands of productive volunteers across the world to aid those in developing nations is one helluva political move.
4) It could improve infrastructure at home. During non-violent times, drafted civilians could complete work projects within the US. New Orleans could be rebuilt in a fraction of the time, and levees could be constructed around dangerous areas that would prevent such disasters from happening again. Any pressing need could be taken care of.
5) America could win in Iraq. Even though the whole invasion was an incredibly stupid move in the first place, if the forces in Iraq were tripled with a draft than it wouldn't be much of a problem to maintain security. And with all those extra forces, reconstructing the country wouldn't be a problem. And if Iraqis found themselves living better than ever before, with the help of the US reconstruction, then the US would have a new ally in the Middle East and a major oil exporter at that.
It'll never happen, bringing back the draft, but it would really help my country (and a lot of others) if it would. Just my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Matt_22 wrote: |
It'll never happen, bringing back the draft, but it would really help my country (and a lot of others) if it would. Just my opinion. |
I totally agree, I think its a good idea. For all the reasons you mention.
As a side note..I think it will have to happen at some point anyway. Call me a pessimist...but I think the changes global warming is gradually bringing about will really destabilise whole regions- and there will be more serious conflicts ahead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am actually thinking of joining the marines or FFL when I get out of Korea.
I am Canadian. Its kinda nice having Moral and ethical flexibility. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hubba bubba wrote: |
| Gwangjuboy wrote: |
| hubba bubba wrote: |
| let me just say that a LOT of "rich politicians" have been in the service. |
Go to Itaewon and meet the canon fodder; You don't meet many Ivy League graduates. |
1. There are more poor people than rich. Ergo, there will be more poor people in the service than rich.
2. Any college graduate is going to go in as an officer. There are less officers than enlisted men.
So, you're right. There aren't many Ivy League graduates there, or anywhere else for that matter. |
The proportional distribution of educated to uneducated people in general society is not the same as the proportional distribution of educated to uneducated people in the military. More poor and uneducated people join the military than rich and educated. It's seen a last resort, and rightly so. If your best option is the military, you ain't in great shape. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am afraid that you are wrong and should look up the statistics on the education level in the US Military.
Truth be known there are college educated in the enlisted ranks because there is a waiting list to get into the officer corps.
It was only very recently that the Army started accepting Volunteers without a HS diploma, and if my information is correct they are required to complete a GED within a certain period of time. And the quota control on the number of recruits sans diploma is quite a bit less than the stardard HS drop out rate.
The proportion of Officer to enlisted reflects to the similar proportion in industry. The average enlistee has a trade and technical expertise.
It takes extreme expertise to field strip a weapon in the dark under fire.
http://www.army.mil/references/FY04ArmyProfile.pdf
cbc
Last edited by cbclark4 on Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| It takes extreme expertise to field strip a weapon in the dark under fire. |
It takes a person with very few good options to join the military... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So in your all tooo humble opinion Pat Tillman had few good options.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Tillman
Humble thyself, what are you espousing some kind of transcendental stereotype of the military man. I really thought that you of all people would be above the stereotype mentality.
Reflect now deeply.
cbc
Last edited by cbclark4 on Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The last time that senator proposed the draft bill, in 2003, it got two votes. It's performance art, it's not a real bill. However, I think he makes a valid point that the people doing the heavy lifting aren't the upper 5%. When the children of the rich might have to serve and die, they might think twice about some damn foolish adventure.
On the flip side, history has shown the rich always have the connections to get their children, if not out of the draft, in positions far out of harms way, like the Air National Guard.
I remember Derrek used to be very pro the Iraq war. I would always ask him why a big, healthy able bodied American who was so sure of the cause, didn't quit his job teaching and sign up. He would grow quiet silent on that topic.
It just seems to me if you're American, you're in favor of the war, and you're capable of serving, well, put your money where your mouth is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bellum99 wrote: |
The simple truth is that America is not winning the war on terror. You need more soldiers and more support staff. The draft may be needed. America can not afford to lose another war....if they lose this war it will be open season on every western country. The rest of the western countries should be helping (Canada included). They are lazy and cowards (I am Canadian).
I agree with the war on terror and believe in taking the fight to the enemy. You don't wait at home for someone to come blow it up..you go to their house and shoot them in their own bed. Always offensive action is better than defensive action.
Bush is right that we should be procative.....I would have bombed them flat but never gone in. Close the borders and let them fight each other till we have a majority government, then go in and set up democracy. |
Now tell us what the Arabs are doing to the soil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cbclark4 wrote: |
I am afraid that you are wrong and should look up the statistics on teh education level in the US Military.
Truth be known there are college educated in the enlisted ranks because there is a waiting list to get into the officer corps. |
Is there a waiting list to join the cannon fodder on the front line?
pro-tip- that's where all the poor young Americans get sent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Take a look at the Casualty reports they are spread across all ranks.
Actually a lot less Private (E1, E3, E3) Rank than you would expect.
I think there is even a rare colonel or two in there.
http://icasualties.org/oif/Details.aspx
cbc |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| Quote: |
| It takes extreme expertise to field strip a weapon in the dark under fire. |
It takes a person with very few good options to join the military... |
shut up. Maybe where you come from it is not so, but in America people will join out of a sense of patriotism and a willingness to fight our enemies! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention that the fat fryer at McDonalds can cause such nasty burns on your fingers.
Personally, I think the current fetishism of soldiers is more damaging than calling them baby-killers or some other nonsense. It makes it easier for those in power to see them off to the meat-grinder because they have the public behind them, waving little flags, and saying, "Try to come back with all of your limbs, dear." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just watched a news show yesterday where they said the lastest studies and numbers suggest that the all volunteer military is representative of all income zones & family backgrounds, not as been suggested by some that only the poor, illiterate and minority join. They said that the military doesn't want to bring the back the draft because it would lower the quality of the military.
Both my brother and I joined the military out of a sense of duty, especially to our father who spent over 30 years in and fought in two wars. It was just something we wanted to do and get out of the way before we started school. We were so used to being around the military all our lives, so joining seemed like a rite of passage. Of course, I couldn't wait to get the hell out once I was in...but that's another dog story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|