|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:34 pm Post subject: Message of H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; Iran's President |
|
|
"In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
O, Almighty God, bestow upon humanity the perfect human being promised to all by You, and make us among his followers.
Noble Americans,
Were we not faced with the activities of the US administration in this part of the world and the negative ramifications of those activities on the daily lives of our peoples, coupled with the many wars and calamities caused by the US administration as well as the tragic consequences of US interference in other countries;
Were the American people not God-fearing, truth-loving, and justice-seeking, while the US administration actively conceals the truth and impedes any objective portrayal of current realities;"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15952309/
This letter is rather long. How would you respond?
The next few weeks are going to be interesting.
Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Nov. 29: Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki postponed a scheduled meeting with President Bush"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15946832/
WASHINGTON - The independent, bipartisan panel studying U.S. policy in Iraq has unanimously agreed to a report that will call for a gradual pullback of American combat troops in Iraq but stops short of setting a firm timetable for withdrawal, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.
The commission is to release its conclusions on Dec. 6 in a report that could help guide U.S. President George W. Bush�s conduct of the war.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15961338/
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbclark4 wrote: |
How would you respond? |
CBC: Ahmadinejad is engaging in "wedge" politics. Far older than Machiavelli; far older than even Sun Tzu.
We have seen this before, in multiple contexts throughout history: Carter and Reagan did it to the Russians and their various subject minority peoples and cultures in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union itself via "human rights" from 1979 through the end of the 1980s -- to cite the example others are most prepared to grasp.
With this letter, Tehran is astutely, if not clumsily and obviously, moving to drive a wedge (or more accurately exacerbate the wedge that already exists) between an unpopular President and "the American people."
As always, I will leave the moralizing to others, even if I find Ahmadinejad's peace-loving claims unsustainable, given Tehran's postRevolution foreign policy, starting with their seizing the U.S. embassy and their taking hostage the American diplomatic corps while denouncing the United States as "the Great Satan."
As for how I might respond, I am confident that State should handle diplomacy and foreign affairs, and if Ahmadinejad were truly interested in negotiating with the United States, I would advise him to go through official, or if this is too politically risky for him, unofficial, diplomatic channels.
And I might hope that if Washington were going to talk with this regime, they might hand Ahmadinejad's letter back to him, reminding him of what Gorbachev once said to Reagan upon receiving a "human rights" lecture: you are not the prosecutor and I am not on trial; but if you want to talk about our relations, let's talk.
Ahmadinejad's attempt to foment domestic unrest, however, will probably backfire. I do not think Ahmadinejad was paying close enough attn to what many Americans said, for example, when Chavez so bitterly denounced W. Bush at the UN General Assembly a while back. I guess we shall have to wait and see.
But if you want to dance to the Iranian govt's tune, be my guest...
Last edited by Gopher on Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:19 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"The Iranian leader, who wrote an 18-page letter to President Bush in May that Bush never responded to, said he was now writing to the American people in friendship because Iran and the United States shared a responsibility �to promote and protect freedom and human dignity and integrity.�"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15947213/?GT1=8717
It looks like Bush had his to respond chance last May.
It looks like Iraq will be selecting an Independent course.
It looks like occupation is bad policy.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CBC: in diplomatic affairs, "not responding" is its own kind of response; it carries its own particular message.
If Ahmadinejad did not like W. Bush's non-response, perhaps he might try another approach.
As for his position as is, he is not really offering anything except the usual indictment which stops just short of accusing the Great Satan of being a plague upon the world. And this is hardly a good place to start negotiating with someone you have, for example, previously blackmailed over hostages.
And, before moving on to my last points, I guess I need to (re)stipulate that I, too, disagree with the Administration's policy in the Middle East, particularly the Iraqi War. But you should be very, very wary of getting out under such conditions that would leave Iran in an enhanced position in the Gulf.
Now to expand my response as one American to this letter: given previous talk from this regime, these words almost read like a threat to me...
Ahmadinejad wrote: |
Hundreds of thousands of my Iranian compatriots are living amongst you in friendship and peace, and are contributing positively to your society. Our people have been in contact with you over the past many years and have maintained these contacts despite the unnecessary restrictions of US authorities. |
Finally, I feel it important to point out to you, CBC, that Ahmadinejad is not merely aiming to get the U.S. out of Iraq; he is also aiming to isolate Israel so that Iran and others (namely Syria and Hezbollah) might move against it. That is, he is crudely attempting to drive multiple wedges here... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that was a fascinating letter. For several reasons.
It isn't often we get extended thought of any world leader without the filter of the media giving us a few sound bytes and then 18 talking heads telling us what to think. (Of course, if we lived in Cuba we could get 6 hour speeches, unfiltered.)
I have to go to class so I'll have to say what I think.
I was impressed with his clear distinction between government and people. He's better at that than some of the regular posters here.
In the first part of his speech, I liked how he tried to draw out similarities and commonalities of the two people. IF people read the speech, I think many will have a somewhat better impression of Iran than before. The effects of 25 years of seeing only bearded flakes in long robes ranting about the Great Satan on TV might be affected.
Gotta go. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
In the first part of his speech, I liked how he tried to draw out similarities and commonalities of the two people. IF people read the speech, I think many will have a somewhat better impression of Iran than before. The effects of 25 years of seeing only bearded flakes in long robes ranting about the Great Satan on TV might be affected. |
Exactly, and something so many others still can't get over.....
So many busy trying to make Satan's or Christs, why don't we just try to find what is human and everyday...?????
DD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
CBC: in diplomatic affairs, "not responding" is its own kind of response; it carries its own particular message.
If Ahmadinejad did not like W. Bush's non-response, perhaps he might try another approach.
|
Speaking of non response what do you think of Maliki cancelling out on the trilateral meeting with Pres. Bush, and the Jordanian King Abdullah.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
cbclark4 wrote: |
Speaking of non response what do you think of...? |
Cannot claim enough area expertise or command of the facts to thoughfully answer this question or discuss the complex processes happening on the ground just now -- especially in the wake of multiple changing variables from the midterm elections to Tehran's initiatives to influence the outcome, and whatever behind-the-scenes diplomacy is apparently going on as well, CBC.
However, with respect to the OP, I think it most unwise to accept Ahmadinejad's letter at face value.
And, again, if I was not clear on this before, it does not "come clean" enough with respect to the Iranian regime's own faults and misdeeds in Mid-East and world affairs. They are not as peaceful, virtuous, and passive as Ahmadinejad hopes "the American people" might believe.
One does not begin negotiations by accusing the other side of so much, while at the same time presenting oneself as nothing less than a saint. Not only is this patently disingenuous, especially in the present case; but it is likely to start things off, and irredeemably so, on the wrong foot... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I can't agree enough in the simple fact the Iran aspires to be in a leadership position, the Throne of Persia, and all that.
The unity of the Moslem world or at least a large part of it will most likely start with Iran.
It seems to me that the slap that Malikki delivered to the US in the person of Bush is a true sign of at least some obstinate mood on the part of Iraq towards US policy. The recent diplomatic movement of Iraq between Syria and Iran would signify a warming up to the neighbors for comfort in impending "divorce".
Also with the statements and not so well hidden threats about the hundreds of thousands of Iranians, one may wish to ask what is the level of infiltration here? How high are we infiltrated? FBI, CIA, NSA, State Dept., DoD? Iran (and AQ) has not been dependant upon electronic intelligence; they rely almost totally on human intelligence.
Maybe some of these things are faints. Some could be signals to his underground in America. We know AQ has cells operating stateside, what do we know of Iranian cells?
Take out the Diatribe he wrote on Israel and look at the rest of his letter, yes, still very decisive but cunning in many ways. I watched the complete press Bush Malikki press conference the body language was scary very scary, I've never seen Bush that off balance.
cbc
Last edited by cbclark4 on Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I was impressed with his clear distinction between government and people. He's better at that than some of the regular posters here.
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The unity of the Molsem world or at least a large part of it will most likely start with Iran. |
Expecting a lot of Sunnis to convert to Shiism?
Or is this in light of the events in the AQ leadership thread?
Just trying to make sense of your comment... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Conversion is not necessary. The differences are based on differing traditions. OBL is Wahabi and has following from both sides of the religious fence. The unity will not be Religious unity, but a geopolitical unity. OBL in the flesh is no longer important. There are Sunni's in Iran not particularly oppressed, there are even Christians in Iran unsure how they fair as a minority.
There could be an Iraq United with Iran or there could be a seperate Iraq with Shiite overtones, there will not be any lovey dovey nonsecular Iraq, ain't gonna happen. The Kurds may have a neutralizing effect in the long run. Excluding Al Sadr and teh Madi Militia jsut will not work.
Yake the US out of the pisture in Iraq and I think Al Sadr will moderate himself when he has a satisfactory hold on the religious arm of the country.
cbc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I thought that was a fascinating letter. For several reasons.
It isn't often we get extended thought of any world leader without the filter of the media giving us a few sound bytes and then 18 talking heads telling us what to think. (Of course, if we lived in Cuba we could get 6 hour speeches, unfiltered.)
I have to go to class so I'll have to say what I think.
I was impressed with his clear distinction between government and people. He's better at that than some of the regular posters here.
In the first part of his speech, I liked how he tried to draw out similarities and commonalities of the two people. IF people read the speech, I think many will have a somewhat better impression of Iran than before. The effects of 25 years of seeing only bearded flakes in long robes ranting about the Great Satan on TV might be affected.
Gotta go. |
How dare the Iranian leader talk abouut human freedom and dignity when Iran jut the opposite is true, where the dissidents are not allowed to speak, where only those who the Ayatolah approve of can run for office, where freedom is just a dream...
Is he seriously trying to paint Iran as a freedom loving nation? I wonder what alot of the Iranian student organizations and reform organizations would think of that speech.
Theres a difference. We're free. Iran isn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
IF people read the speech, I think many will have a somewhat better impression of Iran than before. |
And for those of us who are not so easily swayed by the rhetorical eloquence of the President of the Shariah state.
Iran issues fatwa on Azeri writer
One of Iran's most senior clergymen has issued a fatwa on an Azeri writer said to have insulted the Prophet Muhammad.
The call on Muslims to murder Rafiq Tagi, who writes for Azerbaijan's Senet newspaper, echoes the Iranian fatwa against Indian writer Salman Rushdie.
It was issued by the conservative Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Fazel Lankarani.
The writings of Rafiq Tagi sparked recent demonstrations outside the Azerbaijani embassy in the Iranian capital, Teheran.
The Iranian media is reporting that Grand Ayatollah Lankarani's followers inside the republic of Azerbaijan wrote to him asking for advice about what they called "the apostate writer".
They accuse the Azeri writer of portraying Christianity as superior to Islam and Europe as superior to the Middle East.
They allege that he has ridiculed all the sanctities of Islam and done it knowingly, fully aware of the consequences of his action.
In response, Grand Ayatollah Lankarani is said to have issued a fatwa calling for the death of the writer and also the person responsible for publishing his articles.
Earlier, an Iranian cleric had offered his house as a reward to anyone who killed the Azeri writer.
But this latest fatwa comes from one of the dozen or so Grand Ayatollahs in Iran, who has a large following.
An Azerbaijani court sentenced the writer Rafiq and his publisher to two months in jail for an article which was illustrated by the same cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad originally published in Denmark that caused outcry in the Muslim world.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6158195.stm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|