| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can see a common currency and feeing up and trade and citizenship stuff. But not a totally joined country. New Zealand obviously would get subsumed into the Australian identity and I think there is too much to lose there...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fresh off the presses:
| Quote: |
Dr Cullen [NZ Finance Minister] today told reporters the idea of a closer union between Australia and New Zealand, specifically a common currency, had been "mooted before and rejected before".
"There's no such thing as a common currency on the table and there never has been.
"The Australian Government has made it clear that if we wish to adopt their currency we can do so.
"There's never been a suggestion of a common currency between the two. There's been a suggestion that New Zealand might adopt Australia's currency, we are not going to do that." |
http://stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3889280a11,00.html
Thank God for that! We can join with Australia only as long as everything is on their terms... BOHICA anyone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whether Australia and New Zealand merge seems to ignore the probability that, sooner or later, China and Souteast Asia will subsume them both, no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see too many problems with merging. For one thing, New Zealanders would be forced to become bi-linguial. We already speak English, and then we would have to turn round and learn Strine...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
I see too many problems with merging. For one thing, New Zealanders would be forced to become bi-linguial. We already speak English, and then we would have to turn round and learn Strine...  |
True, and all jokes aside, New Zealand has three official languages to Australia's one. I can't imagine the ozzies being too keen on making NZSL and Maori official languages in any union.
And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gang ah jee wrote: |
| And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
True. I hadn't even thought about that. That would be a really big lump for Australia to swallow. And go against their entire post-colonialisation history. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
| gang ah jee wrote: |
| And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
True. I hadn't even thought about that. That would be a really big lump for Australia to swallow. And go against their entire post-colonialisation history. |
Here we go again, you lot getting on your intellectual and moral high horses. You obviously haven't heard of Mabo and native title. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hans Blix
Joined: 31 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i've got memories of learning a lingustic theory of english which claimed the NZ accent, with its bat -> bet; bet ->bit; and bit ->b't, is the future of all english accents. something about languages' phonetic units tending towards a symmetry, and apparently NZ is the most advanced in this way. might be good for us australians to get in on the ground floor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gang ah jee wrote: |
| Satori wrote: |
I see too many problems with merging. For one thing, New Zealanders would be forced to become bi-linguial. We already speak English, and then we would have to turn round and learn Strine...  |
True, and all jokes aside, New Zealand has three official languages to Australia's one. I can't imagine the ozzies being too keen on making NZSL and Maori official languages in any union.
And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
I've heard the theory put forward before that Australians are try-lingual...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
| gang ah jee wrote: |
| And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
True. I hadn't even thought about that. That would be a really big lump for Australia to swallow. And go against their entire post-colonialisation history. |
Here we go again, you lot getting on your intellectual and moral high horses. You obviously haven't heard of Mabo and native title. |
At least we have moral and intellectual high horses to get on  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
| gang ah jee wrote: |
| And then there's the Treaty of Waitangi. |
True. I hadn't even thought about that. That would be a really big lump for Australia to swallow. And go against their entire post-colonialisation history. |
Here we go again, you lot getting on your intellectual and moral high horses. You obviously haven't heard of Mabo and native title. |
At least we have moral and intellectual high horses to get on  |
I had prepared a rant about the pissant nature of the shakey isles, but in the spirit of reconciliation I offer this.
http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2006/12/stay_where_you.html
Pretty balanced methinks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sleepy in Seoul

Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks jag, I loved it. Very fair and balanced article, and a good wee giggle too I must admit that if Oz and NZ were to ever join, there would only be positives for Oz. It would be a huge step backwards for NZ though... I for one am not looking forward to ever living under the rule of John Howard again, disgusting wee toady that he is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the key conflict would be...
jandals or flip-flops? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sleepy in Seoul wrote: |
Thanks jag, I loved it. Very fair and balanced article, and a good wee giggle too I must admit that if Oz and NZ were to ever join, there would only be positives for Oz. It would be a huge step backwards for NZ though... I for one am not looking forward to ever living under the rule of John Howard again, disgusting wee toady that he is. |
Say what you will about Howard (I have never voted for him personally) but he has managed the Australian economy very well and negotiated a number of beneficial trade deal for us in his ten years in office. IMHO, his worst marks are for handling of refugee policy. I'm not sure what you guys would lose in a federation, perhaps a modicum of political control, but most of that would come down to states' rights issues anyway. However, I believe the best thing is maintain the status quo with enhanced trade and immigration ties, something akin to the relationship that the UK and Ireland enjoy as members of the EU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|