ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
It only took me the first sentence to know it was an intellectually corrupt hatchet job. I didn't read any further.
| Quote: |
| I'm more concerned about how polarizing and divisive a Clinton campaign would be and how the Rupubs must be licking their lips at the thought of a Clinton nomination. I'd really like a few years of no new wars. |
How are those two sentences connected? |
Not hard to understand: Let me paraphrase, expand and explain for you:
Clinton is polarizing, she has high negatives, many people hate her, at normal times she would be unelectable, so the Republicans hope she gets the nomination as they have a good shot at beating her, and because they would surely lose to Obama, and if Hillary wins the nomination and the Republicans' likely nominee, McCain, is elected then we will have 100 years in Iraq, a new war in Iran, and the writer would like to NOT have any new wars for a while.
See. That was easy.
Last edited by ontheway on Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
