| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some of the drugs are hard to test for. Which is why they keep blood samples and test them as detection for drugs improves. Really, considering how fast science improves these days. You will get caught doping sooner or later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Whirlwind
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not boasting if you can back it up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
Wasn't he tested numerous times before the race?
I seem to recall the Jamaican team filing a complaint because of the amouts of tests (4 in one week, I think). |
yep.
I just think he's an outstanding athlete. Just look at his build. Sprinters aren't usually so tall, but he has the muscle mass in the right places to go with it. he's basically shaped like a springbok. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:27 am Post subject: Re: Do you believe that Usain Bolt's clean? |
|
|
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
| Or the rest of the Jamacian team, for that matter? Doesn't it seem awfully similar to the Canadian team in 1988? |
I did sense shades of Ben Johnson when he burst ahead.
But then again, Donovan Bailey was clean and he put Bolt in the shade in the Boasting and Gloating events. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seoulteacher
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:38 pm Post subject: Re: Do you believe that Usain Bolt's clean? |
|
|
Today one would naive to not at least consider the possibility of doping in events such as the Olympics' 100 metres. However, as pointed out above, Usain Bolt has a history of producing world-class results.
And the IOC has certainly been paying attention to Jamaica's successes, and not just at these Games:
"THE medical chief of the Jamaican sprint factory, Dr Herb Elliott, has rubbished suspicions that drug use may be behind Usain Bolt's incredible win in the 100 metres in 9.69 seconds, declaring the victory a product of knowledge."
'Don't patronise us, says Jamaican chief'
http://www.smh.com.au/news/athletics/dont-patronise-us-says-jamaican-chief/2008/08/17/1218911461530.html
My feeling - not discounting the beneficial effects of the yams that his home region is famous for! - is that the man is just amazingly good! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Len8
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Location: Kyungju
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| He should make it a double with a 200 meters win to go along with his 100 meter win |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's possible to create slight varients of steroids that are more difficult to detect. I'm no scientist but I did once watch a documentary on how it works. It involves the complicity of highly trained scientists; the fact that the Jamaican team might not be able to afford them is about the only thing that makes me think they may possibly be clean.
Also, look at the men versus women. The top male sprinters are getting faster while the top female sprinters are getting slower. The only woman who's come close to Joyner's 1988 record, Marian Jones, was also found to be cheating. Now suddenly, the top three female sprinters, and the only ones posting sub-11-second times, are all Jamaicans. Does that suggest different trends in training or different trends in cheating? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JustJohn

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Your computer screen
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gene doping. Look it up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Len8 wrote: |
| He should make it a double with a 200 meters win to go along with his 100 meter win |
He did. And once again, he casually jogged over the line ahead of the field. When you have the physique of a racehorse, there ain't no need for dope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frankly Mr Shankly
Joined: 13 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I think he deserves the right to be innocent until proven otherwise. |
I agree. |
Wasn't he tested numerous times before the race?
I seem to recall the Jamaican team filing a complaint because of the amouts of tests (4 in one week, I think). |
Six times or so, I read. Clean until proven guilty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've heard there test for over 4,000 banned substances at these Olympics. Well, I'd be inclined to bet that there are at least 4,001 substances which enhance performance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shauneyz

Joined: 26 May 2008 Location: The land of Nod
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of course he's boasting...in the 100m he turned around before he crossed the finish line. I don't get down on him for it though. Is it unsportsmanlike? Eh...maybe. Whatever though, he's just that good, and it's amazing to watch a freak of nature like that run around a track.
Then again, my favorite baseball player is Manny Ramirez, and nobody boasts more than he does. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:28 pm Post subject: Re: Do you believe that Usain Bolt's clean? |
|
|
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
| Or the rest of the Jamacian team, for that matter? Doesn't it seem awfully similar to the Canadian team in 1988? |
I'd believe Bolt's clean long long long before I believe the Chinese gymnasts are older than 14. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cornfed
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From following strength-related sports for a few years, my impression is that practically all top strength athletes and most top speed athletes use drugs. Why should they not? There are various ways to beat the tests, even if you don't have the connections to get positive results covered up like Carl Lewis.
As to why female athletes are getting slower mentioned upthread, the answer is obvious. Because of the attention to now given to drugs, they can't take anything that has a blatantly masculinizing effect on their appearance. They are therefore limited to anavar and non-steroid drugs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If the US misses out on a gold medal then the other competitor must be on steroids, underage or cheating in some other way. It's the only logical conclusion. There's no way another country's athlete could beat a US athlete through training or superior physical prowess alone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|