View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The antenna looks really tall |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
It certainly looks very bomb and aircraft-proof. I can't see that collapsing- the angled corners and faces would be more likely to deflect than absorb.
It inspires confidence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
keithinkorea

Joined: 17 Mar 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a cool building, there are better around the world but it looks good on paper.
It would be interesting to see what types of business move in there. The 911 attack -resectfully- wasn't an attack on the US but an attack on the world, people from all around the world died there. It wasn't just a tragedy for Americans.
Most people around the world agreed with the action taken against Afghanistan and more specifically the Taliban scumbags (I would have agreed on military action against the Taliban long before the 911 terror attack).
Iraq was a mistake, and alienated many strong allies of the US. It was an arrogant mistake or a mistake born of ignorance and arrogance.
Sorry to politicise the thread but this building is going to have a lot of scrutiny. I think it's a pretty cool building anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
They should've built three towers slightly different from the old ones.
You destroy two, we build three!! Now that would've been an act of defiance! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The "defiant" aspect is undercut by the fact that most of the tower's height is made up of antenna. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do like the way it echoes the building up city- I think it must be the Chrysler building (oops! I actually think it might be the Empire State Building, on second look). It makes it feel more like it fits into the old city. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Links

Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Location: It's censorship and it's downright blasphemous
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks good to me. Keeps the skyline looking nice. I like that it faces the 911 monument. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Deconstructor wrote: |
You destroy two, we build three!! Now that would've been an act of defiance! |
I like the design okay. The important thing is to build something.
And I don't think it's possible to make something that big that will withstand a couple of planes smashing into it ... the point is, you knock it down, we'll build it back, you knock that one down, we'll build another.
And so on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Freedom Tower is a waste of money. Spend it money on alternative energy research. That is real freedom. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sonofthedarkstranger
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it should have hidden anti-aircraft missile launchers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Links

Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Location: It's censorship and it's downright blasphemous
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sonofthedarkstranger wrote: |
I think it should have hidden anti-aircraft missile launchers. |
You don't think it does? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Links wrote: |
sonofthedarkstranger wrote: |
I think it should have hidden anti-aircraft missile launchers. |
You don't think it does? |
You mean they would shoot down a civilian passenger airline if it was coming in to hit the tower?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The location is all wrong.
It should be built right in the center of the crater where Mecca is/once was. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Thunndarr

Joined: 30 Sep 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
The location is all wrong.
It should be built right in the center of the crater where Mecca is/once was. |
Zing! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brento1138
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:48 pm Post subject: Re: Freedom Tower |
|
|
I think it fits in with the other buildings just nicely, and I am pleasantly surprised with it. The other versions looked very awkward, and I never liked Trump's idea of simply rebuilding the old towers. I like the "twisty" look to the new building... very cool. The blue light shining upward will also give New York a new look really, almost futuristic. But the name, "freedom tower" is a bit... I dunno... hasn't this "freedom" word been played to death recently? I guess it's well-named in that it reflects the era in which it was built, a sad era for the U.S. (where the concept of "freedom" was being critically evaluated by many, the status of the country in the world has fallen significantly, and the economy and future prospects have dimmed)... so you could look at the name in multiple ways. "Freedom tower" almost has a sad ring to it... I think anyways.
Overall, I think it's a nice improvement over those ugly twin tower buildings which really weren't aesthetically pleasing at all, they were pretty boring looking.
I like this new tower much better. I hope they include a memorial with it.
Last edited by brento1138 on Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|