|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
 |
|
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
|
|
| partick thistle wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
Again, you are so wrong.
What was wrong with Jimmy Carter? |
1. he is a terrible antisemite. Walking scumbag.
2. He was the worst president in the modern era. Absolute garbage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Masta_Don
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Location: Hyehwa-dong, Seoul
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd say the number of dictators that would be allowed to continue doing as they wish would balance out the number of dictators that America wouldn't be putting into power by adopting a non-interventionalist agenda. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Masta_Don wrote: |
| I'd say the number of dictators that would be allowed to continue doing as they wish would balance out the number of dictators that America wouldn't be putting into power by adopting a non-interventionalist agenda. |
What dictators are you talking about?
When you explain more the difference will be clear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
That is not so . See how Turkey gets so upset about possible resolution by the US.
It does matter and in this case it is also free.
You should have said doesn't matter very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
That is not so . See how Turkey gets so upset about possible resolution by the US.
It does matter and in this case it is also free.
You should have said doesn't matter very much. |
Turkey...mmm...why a resolution there, they are planning to invade a terrorist harboring country and make them give up their war, or so i heard.
If he believes that intervention in other countries is a bad idea then he would be a hyprocrite to sign this bill. It being free is irrelevant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: Re: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| partick thistle wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
Again, you are so wrong.
What was wrong with Jimmy Carter? |
1. he is a terrible antisemite. Walking scumbag.
2. He was the worst president in the modern era. Absolute garbage. |
Jimmy Carter would eat you up and spit you out, jinju.
I bet you didn't know that J. Carter, out of all the United States presidents besides Washington, has the longest tenure of service in the military.
Men who have been to war aren't so cavalier with other men's lives.
I know Jimmy Carter. You sir are no Jimmy Carter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| carter is a nazi scumbag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
