Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Hillary camp claims superdelegates make Obama wins irrelevan
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Hillary camp claims superdelegates make Obama wins irrelevan Reply with quote

http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/02/16/top-clinton-adviser-says-superdelegates-will-decide-election-obamas-victories-irrelevant/

This is a desperation attempt. Hillary sees herself losing, if she's willing to risk pissing off people by saying this.

She's basically telling Democrats, "Vote for me now, because if you don't, I'm going to cash in a whole lot chips others owe me to win this thing."

This is getting nasty really, really fast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bass,

I don't think that's going to happen. I'm optimisitc it's not even going to be a factor if Tuesday's outcome goes how I think it will.

I'd already seen the statement (although it wasn't through Fox it was through a newspaper) earlier today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think the superdelegates are going to be the deciding factor either. Obama is going to win, and win big in the next few weeks and Clinton will continue to weaken, probably to the point of dropping out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Clintons tend to assume that the super delegates who have endorsed Hillary have some kind of rock-ribbed loyalty to her that will preclude them switching their votes. It's bunk, of course; the Clinton family's sense of what the party owes them is far out of step with what the party thinks, and no super delegate wants to play spoiler (especially those whose constituencies voted for Obama).

I agree with Ya-Ta: it's not going to come to that. Obama will pick up enough of a pledged delegate lead that the Clinton camp won't have even their current, weak case for super delegate support, the supers will jump ship, and that's all she wrote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope FLA and Mich people get their say.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
I hope FLA and Mich people get their say.


If so, they need to be re-done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope Michigan and Florida DON'T get their say. What is wrong with holding people accountable? I've gone from respecting the Clintons to loathing them in four short months.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Czarjorge wrote:
I hope Michigan and Florida DON'T get their say. What is wrong with holding people accountable?


Because the primary voters of these states did not make the decision to move their states' primaries up. A select handful of these states' elites did.

Quote:
I've gone from respecting the Clintons to loathing them in four short months.


What the hell does that have to do with MI and FL?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Czarjorge wrote:
I hope Michigan and Florida DON'T get their say. What is wrong with holding people accountable?


Because the primary voters of these states did not make the decision to move their states' primaries up. A select handful of these states' elites did.

Quote:
I've gone from respecting the Clintons to loathing them in four short months.


What the hell does that have to do with MI and FL?


point the first: Both states are primary states. I'm not sure exactly how delegates are selected in either state, but in most primary states the elites are the delegates. Wouldn't it be just as disenfranchising to the average Dem in those states if the delegations were seated as they currently stand. I wouldn't be opposed to giving them a mulligan, but not holding to the rules sends a very bad message to any state Dem organization. Those states parties were the ones that disenfranchised their members, those "average people" should get involved and remove the Dem leadership.

point the second: Are you serious? Who's pushing to get MI and FL included? Old Miss Spoil Sport, that's who.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
What the hell does that have to do with MI and FL?


I would guess what Czar is alluding to is the fact that Clinton is going to try to seat those two states. That along with superdelegates is the core strategy behind how she thinks she's going to win the nomination. Unfortunately, she should be concentrating on winning primaries and spend less time stating about how other states don't count.

If you'll remember a couple of months ago, it was me who predicted there would be lawsuits over the Florida and Michigan primaries. I still think it may come down to that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Czarjorge wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Czarjorge wrote:
I hope Michigan and Florida DON'T get their say. What is wrong with holding people accountable?


Because the primary voters of these states did not make the decision to move their states' primaries up. A select handful of these states' elites did.

Quote:
I've gone from respecting the Clintons to loathing them in four short months.


What the hell does that have to do with MI and FL?


point the first: Both states are primary states. I'm not sure exactly how delegates are selected in either state, but in most primary states the elites are the delegates. Wouldn't it be just as disenfranchising to the average Dem in those states if the delegations were seated as they currently stand. I wouldn't be opposed to giving them a mulligan, but not holding to the rules sends a very bad message to any state Dem organization. Those states parties were the ones that disenfranchised their members, those "average people" should get involved and remove the Dem leadership.

point the second: Are you serious? Who's pushing to get MI and FL included? Old Miss Spoil Sport, that's who.


To your first point: Whoever is the nominee, they'll have to explain why they supported the DNC's decision to disenfranchise MI and FL to people who had nothing to do with the scheduling.

I agree that not holding to the rules would send a very bad message. But the RNC punished SC much more wisely: it halved their delegates.

The mulligan solution is the best solution. Obama should get the chance to compete in MI, and run a full campaign in FL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't believe it's right to disenfranchize people, especially when the average citizen had nothing to do with the infraction. It would be unfair to Obama to seat the delegates chosen in the original primaries, because he respected the decision.

The DNC should re-schedule primaries in Michigan and Florida, if it becomes clear their votes could determine a winner between Clinton and Obama.

I'm in agreement with:
Quote:
Obama should get the chance to compete in MI, and run a full campaign in FL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The DNC offered to reschedule new primaries and even pay for them. Florida & Michigan wouldn't go for it -- after all, that would negate the whole foundation of their little power play.

The best we can hope for is that the nominee is decided before the convention, and that the DNC wakes up, smells the coffee, and totally revamps the rules after November.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stillnotking wrote:
The DNC offered to reschedule new primaries and even pay for them. Florida & Michigan wouldn't go for it -- after all, that would negate the whole foundation of their little power play.


Link?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also thought it was pretty much a given that Hiliary is going to win this thing through the superdelegate system.

I want Obama to win it just as much as the next guy, and will be disappointed if he doesn't, but I've already resigned it to the fact it'll be Clinton vs McCain come November (sadly).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International