Korean Job Discussion Forums

Gopher · Joined: 04 Jun 2005

Simple question. "Here" refers to the Current Events forum. Posters create multiple threads and repeat the process on this forum. There must be, roughly, three dozen or so threads treating JFK's assassination here. That presupposes an interest in reading them. That makes this a fair and pertinent question.

Well, then?

CentralCali · Joined: 17 May 2007

No. The issue has been, pardon the expression, done to death. Only whacked-out nut-job conspiracy theorists who cannot accept evidence or actual forensic science think that it happened any other way than the official version.

MOD edit: Inflammatory comments

Adventurer · Joined: 28 Jan 2006

Personally, it doesn't interest me. It happened 45 years ago, and there are sealed files, and there are so many modern issues to look at, and no one feels they can really get a handle who done it kind of thing....
If someone wants to post about it, let them go ahead, but I don't feel we should get post after post about it rather than it being in one thread or adding a post to an establish thread or maybe there could be a stick for those conspiracy people, maybe. I am not sure how you can deal with this topic exactly?

Any thoughts?

Mew Mew Kitty · Joined: 09 Mar 2008

Hello!

After a quick mod review and cleaning up some silly flaming, we're putting this thread back where it belongs. We all hope that you'll be happy to participate in this thread like the reasonable people you all are. Thank you for understanding and being willing to work with us all in helping to transform this site into something to be proud of participating in.

Have a mewtiful day!

stevemcgarrett · Joined: 24 Mar 2006

It's been done to death, indeed. But now our resident conspiracy-monger is taking up another Kennedy killing, this time with Bobby. Rolling Eyes

I think the continued presence of so many similar threads on this forum speaks volumes about the efficacy of the MOD Team.

Nowhere Man · Joined: 08 Feb 2004

I voted "yes".

Am I interested in discussing the JFK assassination?

Nope.

Should we allow discussion of the JFK assasination here?

I think that's what this poll is really about.

My answer is "absolutely".

Should we have 34 threads about it? No.

But regicide has already accepted having one thread as fair.

Done deal.

So what happens if the majority don't want to discuss JFK?

It goes in the forum guidelines that JFK is not to be discussed here?

That's a load.

Gopher · Joined: 04 Jun 2005

Relax. This poll is about a single question, no more no less. Stop putting motives into my head and words into my mouth. Your voting behavior and your explantion for it make perfect sense to me, incidentally.

Nowhere Man · Joined: 08 Feb 2004

Pligganease · Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Location: The deep south...

JFK threads should be in off-topic. The assassination of JFK is not a "Current Event."

Manner of Speaking · Joined: 09 Jan 2003

I'm not interested in discussing the JFK assassination, but that is neither here nor there. If others on this forum want to discuss it, it's their right as far as I'm concerned...the only thing I object to is spamming the forum.

Enrico Palazzo · Mod Team Joined: 11 Mar 2008

Poktanju · Mod Team Joined: 15 Jun 2005

Bramble · Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes

Justin Hale · Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Location: the Straight Talk Express

I voted NO, but really that's not strong enough to express my lack of interest in posters such as Regicide and Igotthisguitar. Almost without exception, I skip their posts and don't click on their threads. Given this, it doesn't really bother me.

ED209 · Joined: 17 Oct 2006

I would like to see more threads discussing the problem of multiple threads.

I voted balls.