View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Imrahil

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Location: On the other side of the world.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crusher_of_heads
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's even better than the email address of the reporter.
Korea English NO |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
what difference would it make, really?
E education and competence would not improve and as soon as any foreign investor came and found out how abysmal the E levels really are, well, ce la vie!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aboxofchocolates

Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Location: on your mind
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
``Language barriers make life for foreigners more difficult, so let's remove them,'' he added |
Just please be gentle. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
an attempt to legitimize konglish, a bunch of english mistakes routinized in poor textbooks and the thriving domestic ESL industry self-help literature, mistakes spoken by Koreans to Koreans and righteously defended as their way of speaking english when their mistakes are pointed out
in a society where 98% speak Korean it's absurd to make english an official language when it isn't even alive here as a second language |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
How often has this proposal been made in the past decade? I can recall at least one other time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Straphanger
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Location: Chilgok, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
what difference would it make, really?
E education and competence would not improve and as soon as any foreign investor came and found out how abysmal the E levels really are, well, ce la vie!!  |
Yeeeah... You can go ahead and complain about a Korean saying Sand-a-wich-ee when you can properly use co-opted French phrases.
C'est la vie. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
IAMAROBOT
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I always crack up when I see that guy's e-mail address. Can't they just standardize the e-mail addresses? Like familyname.firstname#@koreaherald.com. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whirlwind
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
The fact that it is even being considered is dumb. Hardly any English spoken in this country. Usually, in order to declare an official language, you've got to have a sizable number of people speaking it and it has to have an impact somewhere. English doesn't have much of an impact on Korea despite their woeful attempts at learning it. Another braindead idea by Koreans.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
red_devil

Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
How often has this proposal been made in the past decade? I can recall at least one other time. |
Yeah. The current administration in this country is like the Korean version of the Bush administration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GreenlightmeansGO

Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Come on! Support the guy!
If this comes through, babies will be born that are fluent in English.
Why stop at one more language...think of the power the nation with the highest IQ could accomplish if their kids had automatic fluency at several languages, thanks to government influence.
The man is a fucking genius. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Straphanger wrote: |
moosehead wrote: |
what difference would it make, really?
E education and competence would not improve and as soon as any foreign investor came and found out how abysmal the E levels really are, well, ce la vie!!  |
Yeeeah... You can go ahead and complain about a Korean saying Sand-a-wich-ee when you can properly use co-opted French phrases.
C'est la vie. |
oh yeah hang me by my thumbs for making a spelling error - I was (am still) veged out from listening to the parrots recite their memorized speeches all day - cut me some slack already  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itstiff
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you think about it though, only a few decades ago (or maybe half a century ago) did they adapt Hangul and forced everyone to learn it. Why can't they do the same in Korea?
But, I'm not a supporter of it but if they adopted English and Korean as their national languages it'd be pretty sweet. They'd be the third (?) Asian country do so, behind Singapore and Hong Kong who of course only did it because they were British colonies. I never see this happen though.
I did an exercise with my teacher conversation class, creating a new society, and one of the questions was: "what would be your official language(s)?" and I specifically pointed out that you can have more then one, and every group only choose Korean. I don't get it, they're paying so much and so much time into learning English but Korea is of course always more superior, better, and needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simonandmartina
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aboxofchocolates wrote: |
Quote: |
``Language barriers make life for foreigners more difficult, so let's remove them,'' he added |
Just please be gentle. |
Ha! Am I the only one who found this hilarious? Get it? "them" can refer to either the barriers or the foreigners! Ha! Brilliant! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sigh!
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Acknowledging the difficulties the government would face in adopting English as an official language, Chung said, ``That is what the government is for.'' |
Not quite as good as requesting that foreigners be removed, but still... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|