Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Obama's Stimulus. Saviour or Disaster?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Will the Stimulus Work?
Economic Saviour
3%
 3%  [ 1 ]
Something needs to be done
45%
 45%  [ 14 ]
Disaster
51%
 51%  [ 16 ]
Total Votes : 31

Author Message
Rusty Shackleford



Joined: 08 May 2008

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:20 pm    Post subject: Obama's Stimulus. Saviour or Disaster? Reply with quote

Do you think the stimulus will save the US economy? Or is it a pork laden spend up that will leave future generations carrying the burden?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jeff's Cigarettes



Joined: 27 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The worst thing that happened was "W" wasn't allowed to serve as Pres for life, IMO. Of course it's pork laden and only increasing the dept while not offering any long term strategy. The Empire was a better idea and the timing was perfect. Here�s what the Congressional Budget Office had to say about "Bamma's Crib" Communist Stimulating Package.


"President Obama�s economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.

CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.

CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
grendellives



Joined: 06 Jan 2009

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff's Cigarettes is a republican? Wow! I din't see that one coming Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dude Ranch



Joined: 04 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama's stimulus is like a guy gettin laid off of work and saying he is going to stimulate his own personal economy by re modelling his kitchen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demonicat



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Location: Suwon

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, its more like a rich guy who after seeing lots of people with no work suffering says, "Y'know, I'm sure I have some yard work that needs doing". The goal is to make jobs. We may not need a ton of new roads, or new broadband, or this or that- but by making them we make jobs. By making jobs, we encourage spending, spending which constitutes 2/3's of the American economy. Letting it be without doing anything will just not work right now, hell we tried that and watched as the banks collapsed. Pure tax cuts do not work as they do relatively little for the 623,000 people out of work.

A note about the 623,000 number which was released today. That is the number of new people filing for unemployment benefits. By nature that is severely skewed low, as it does not factor in most hourly employees, new employees, or a substantial number of construction/blue collar workers.

A challenge to all who would hate on the stimulus...no, two challenges- pick your favorite:
1) Give an alternate solution
2) Move to the US, get a new job, and live for at least a year without going into debt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Forward Observer



Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Location: FOB Gloria

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't met any republicans or conservatives that have had any visceral or emotional dislike for the Obama the way liberals did with Bush.

I think the Onion had it right when it said: "America gives world's hardest job to black man".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rusty Shackleford



Joined: 08 May 2008

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Demonicat wrote:
No, its more like a rich guy who after seeing lots of people with no work suffering says, "Y'know, I'm sure I have some yard work that needs doing". The goal is to make jobs. We may not need a ton of new roads, or new broadband, or this or that- but by making them we make jobs. By making jobs, we encourage spending, spending which constitutes 2/3's of the American economy. Letting it be without doing anything will just not work right now, hell we tried that and watched as the banks collapsed. Pure tax cuts do not work as they do relatively little for the 623,000 people out of work.

A note about the 623,000 number which was released today. That is the number of new people filing for unemployment benefits. By nature that is severely skewed low, as it does not factor in most hourly employees, new employees, or a substantial number of construction/blue collar workers.

A challenge to all who would hate on the stimulus...no, two challenges- pick your favorite:
1) Give an alternate solution
2) Move to the US, get a new job, and live for at least a year without going into debt


Your grasp of basic economics is faulty at best my friend. Your reasoning is what's called "the Broken Windows Fallacy." BY your reckoning it would be a good idea to break a lot of windows in order to create jobs for glaziers and they would in turn create jobs for others. Unfortunately what you are really doing is destroying wealth as the guy that got his windows broken now can't buy the things he wanted.

All the stimulus will do is in most cases shuffle work around. Probably from productive to unproductive means of production. You should google "Economics in One Lesson." It's a book that was written in the 40s that I wish every politician and poster on Daves would read. It's free so I emplore you to educate yourself about the basic tenets of what markets are and how they work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demonicat



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Location: Suwon

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Friend, I have read that and while it is very well written it is not gospel. I understand and usually sympathize with the libertarian viewpoint (the glazier story outed you), and usually I find myself leaning towards it myself. At this time, however, I have to disagree with it. The window is already broken. We did not break it to create jobs, the window is broke. We can either leave it broken, or hire the people to fix it.

This was pointed out by Keynes who made it quite clear that even building meaningless pyramids would be beneficial if it created work. In addition, Bastiat himself said that the boy is in fact a benefactor, just not the best possible benefactor. Furthermore, in our modern society the issue is not that there is no money, so the cost of the window is passed on, but that the money is held withing banks and holdings. Therefore, the cost to repair the window is made liquid and allowed back into the economy.

Finally the book you suggest everyone read, in which the broken window theory is postulated, is in fact a short essay "That which is seen and that which is unseen", it was written in the 1850's not the 1940's. Have you read it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The goal is to make jobs.


At what cost, to whom, and when?

Quote:
1) Give an alternate solution
2) Move to the US, get a new job, and live for at least a year without going into debt


This is an issue of contracting demand. The preceding 20 or so years of economic growth have by in large been due not to added productivity, but increased access to credit. Economists call this the "consumption compromise" (instead of rising wages, workers get more credit, which gives the illusion of prosperity).

So, these jobs that are being lost cannot be stopped. There are structural changes happening that even Obama can not fight. Credit has peaked, and is now contracting. This can't be stopped. Ergo, the consumption and economic activity that depended upon this credit will contract. The economy is 72% consumption, and this is falling.

So, a "stimulus". This, from borrowed money. What this means is that the jobs of the future won't be created. Public borrowing will crowd out private investment (finite dollars on earth) and less investment = less economic growth. So, to "stimulate" a few jobs today, we kill untold jobs tomorrow.

The first rule of economics is to look beyond "what is seen" and search for what is "unseen".

From this, the appropriate action is to ensure that those who are unemployed have access to fair unemployment insurance. The economy is retrenching and unemployment is a consequence of this. The role of the state should be to help those who have fallen 1) not hit bottom and 2) get back