|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:46 pm Post subject: Did China Wreck the Copenhagen Deal? |
|
|
Here's an interesting allegation:
"The truth is this: China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful "deal" so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen.
"China's strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world's poor once again...
"To those who would blame Obama and rich countries in general, know this: it was China's representative who insisted that industrialised country targets, previously agreed as an 80% cut by 2050, be taken out of the deal. "Why can't we even mention our own targets?" demanded a furious Angela Merkel. Australia's prime minister, Kevin Rudd, was annoyed enough to bang his microphone. Brazil's representative too pointed out the illogicality of China's position. Why should rich countries not announce even this unilateral cut? The Chinese delegate said no, and I watched, aghast, as Merkel threw up her hands in despair and conceded the point. Now we know why � because China bet, correctly, that Obama would get the blame for the Copenhagen accord's lack of ambition."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas
That's the claim. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good thread topic, Ya-ta. I wonder why no-one here has been discussing this.
China behaved disgracefully - they are an absolute menace to us all (and themselves it seems). I've long wondered how they would behave once they reached superpower status, and perhaps this is a taste of things to come. *shudders* I must say I've never really looked forward to their international rise - especially given how they treat their own citizens.
China tried to hold an exclusive meeting with India and South Africa (and I think Brazil if my memory serves me) to seal a deal - and Obama had to force his way in with his security guys so that he could join in. WTF? And the Chinese were trying to keep out American and British TV crews while having Chinese crews there. What was that about?
It was all about Wen Jinbao flipping the bird to the rest of the world, especially the US. I hope he feels very satisfied with himself. What a selfish, egotistical, reckless and very dangerous pr***. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: Did China Wreck the Copenhagen Deal? |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Here's an interesting allegation:
"The truth is this: China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful "deal" so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen.
"China's strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world's poor once again...
"To those who would blame Obama and rich countries in general, know this: it was China's representative who insisted that industrialised country targets, previously agreed as an 80% cut by 2050, be taken out of the deal. "Why can't we even mention our own targets?" demanded a furious Angela Merkel. Australia's prime minister, Kevin Rudd, was annoyed enough to bang his microphone. Brazil's representative too pointed out the illogicality of China's position. Why should rich countries not announce even this unilateral cut? The Chinese delegate said no, and I watched, aghast, as Merkel threw up her hands in despair and conceded the point. Now we know why � because China bet, correctly, that Obama would get the blame for the Copenhagen accord's lack of ambition."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas
That's the claim. |
In the long run, China will get their fair share of blame for this. The dust has yet to settle.
These last few days I've felt so frustrated by China, I wish I could start a movement to encourage people to stop buying from them! And India too - they colluded. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some little Asian men with outsized egos couldn't handle the idea of actually allowing in an international body to ensure they actually followed through with emissions cuts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My favorite China Hand weighs in on this: Copenhagen Miscalculation
Quote: |
Beijing went to Denmark believing it would be able to achieve great success.
[But] In fact, at the last minute, US President Barack Obama and Premier Wen had to work almost by themselves on a compromise that could salvage the conference.
The banana peel on which it all slipped was the issue of verification. The developed countries were willing to fund the technology transfer required to cut emissions, but they also wanted to verify that the cuts were actually being made. This verification issue went directly to the heart of a problem that already existed between China and the United States.
So with no agreement in place on transparency of verification, and if cuts to pollution are in any way linked to monetary aid or international accord, the differences between the observations of China and the United States could explode in ferocious and public face-losing controversy.
The idea that Beijing took to Copenhagen was part of a complicated balancing act. The Chinese central government wanted a weapon to put pressure on local governments, with the threat of international sanctions and the carrot of new technologies for energy savings. The Copenhagen treaty was to be a tool in a game of cat and mouse between center and periphery by which the pollution situation would gradually improve.
But it was not possible that such a complex operation could take place under the eyes of the world, with the Americans and others every day picking on Beijing and its local governments for this or that misreported data. |
China will not allow the West inside the curtain. And America will not work with China on blind trust. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rocket_scientist
Joined: 23 Nov 2009 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If the anti's were so smart, why didn't they anticipate both auditing China and then auditing how the poor nations used the funds? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rusty Shackleford
Joined: 08 May 2008
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Junior wrote: |
Some little Asian men with outsized egos couldn't handle the idea of actually allowing in an international body to ensure they actually followed through with emissions cuts. |
Good grief.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blockhead confidence
Joined: 02 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
My favorite China Hand weighs in on this: Copenhagen Miscalculation
Quote: |
Beijing went to Denmark believing it would be able to achieve great success.
[But] In fact, at the last minute, US President Barack Obama and Premier Wen had to work almost by themselves on a compromise that could salvage the conference.
The banana peel on which it all slipped was the issue of verification. The developed countries were willing to fund the technology transfer required to cut emissions, but they also wanted to verify that the cuts were actually being made. This verification issue went directly to the heart of a problem that already existed between China and the United States.
So with no agreement in place on transparency of verification, and if cuts to pollution are in any way linked to monetary aid or international accord, the differences between the observations of China and the United States could explode in ferocious and public face-losing controversy.
The idea that Beijing took to Copenhagen was part of a complicated balancing act. The Chinese central government wanted a weapon to put pressure on local governments, with the threat of international sanctions and the carrot of new technologies for energy savings. The Copenhagen treaty was to be a tool in a game of cat and mouse between center and periphery by which the pollution situation would gradually improve.
But it was not possible that such a complex operation could take place under the eyes of the world, with the Americans and others every day picking on Beijing and its local governments for this or that misreported data. |
China will not allow the West inside the curtain. And America will not work with China on blind trust. |
He (Sisci) is certainly idiosyncratic. The national government of China would wish an international threat of sanctions on itself so as to tame its own provincial governments? It sounds like a country on the brink of fragmentation.
And then to claim that Beijing didn't forsee the US wanting verification for polution reduction, etc. in exchange for cash - Jackie Chan would do a better job of running China it seems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pink

Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The pollution in China is at times almost unbelievable. I've lived there now for 4 months and I've seen some pretty bad days. I don't even live in the areas where they dump toxic chemicals into the water and soil. I get coal burning in the air...sometimes it is a thick as the thickest fog you've ever seen in your life.
I really wish other countries would get on China's case and push them for reforms. China doesn't care about its people. Why should they when they have so many? If 10% were to die, they would still have more than any other country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hope
Joined: 22 Nov 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Panda

Joined: 25 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for posting the link again, Hope.
I hope those photos also remind you how poor most Chinese people are.
If you led a life like these people are, you wouldn't really care how more CO2 emission will make the earth warmer.
One the other hand, Please everybody notice that the carbon emission of the US is 19t/person, the figure of China is 4.1t/person, which is lower than the average level of the world 4.3t/person
Maybe not every Chinese people deserves a car as American people do ( considering how much they get scolded in this thread), but at least, I think all people need to eat and make living... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Panda wrote: |
One the other hand, Please everybody notice that the carbon emission of the US is 19t/person, the figure of China is 4.1t/person, which is lower than the average level of the world 4.3t/person
|
Thank you for reminding us of the CCP party line, Panda.
But the sticking point in the deal was never really a matter of fairness, it was verification. And the Chinese don't do verification. Meanwhile, the Americans don't do free money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeonmunka
Joined: 05 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remember that Britain and the US and Germany were allowed to industrialize - and suffered pollution in places equal to that of localized places in China - like that one in the photo near the bottom, the coal and metal smelter in Laisotang or somename - think about filthy Pittsburg 25-40 years ago, or the great coal fog of London in 1956.
China is only doing what indudtrialized nations already did. (Albeit on a larger and more rapid scale.) Now we are telling them they can't.
That's the problem. Our countries keep stuffing themselves up for the future.
It's happening again in Aus. Australia is stripping & depleting its resources right now. In 50 years time there will be stuff all metals left to draw on. Rudd is being facetious if he's banging on his mic about China. He should look in his own backyard. What will Australians tell their grandkids when they ask, what's left for us? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wishmaster
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Chinese are bad for the world. Unlike the US, they won't even attempt to account for their actions. If you think the US does a terrible job as a superpower, wait until China comes along. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
donducky
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:42 am Post subject: Hurrah for China! |
|
|
Wishmaster wrote: |
The Chinese are bad for the world. Unlike the US, they won't even attempt to account for their actions. If you think the US does a terrible job as a superpower, wait until China comes along. |
On the contrary. The Chinese are good for the world, and have just done all of us a very big favor.
AGW is a totally bogus theory--heard of Climategate? In fact, we're rapidly approaching a new ice age, and it's nothing to do with carbon emissions--nothing whatsoever.
Cutting carbon emissions is a formula for sinking the world into an ever much worse economic slump than it's in now. The Chinese know this. They're smart, and they're doing the right thing.
Imagine: the "bastards thrown out," once and forever, and replaced by a pro-people party. It happened in China, in 1949, and the pro-people policies of an ever stronger, ever richer China are now beginning to benefit the entire world.
THANK YOU, CHINA! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|