Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

That hit and run accident with the army guy
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shawner88



Joined: 01 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:13 am    Post subject: That hit and run accident with the army guy Reply with quote

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200311/29/200311290123009179900090409041.html


Anyone know why news of this event has been so sparse? I thought when I first read it, a rage would sweep across the country but it seems to have gone barely noticed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kiwiboy_nz_99



Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Location: ...Enlightenment...

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been waiting for the reaction too, but it's not happening.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This might be one reason for the relative lack of an uproar:

Quote:
Under the Status of Forces Agreement, the legal framework governing the U.S. military in South Korea, the primary jurisdiction in a fatal hit-and-run accident involving U.S. military personnel is in South Korea, according to police and the Foreign Ministry.
"We will hand over Sergeant Olken to U.S. custody after an investigation," a police official said yesterday. "We will summon him again if we believe he has to be held in our custody."


Am I correct in understanding that that this means he'll be tried in a Korean court?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawner88



Joined: 01 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The guy must have been drunk, why else would he run away? And the fact that he was asleep when the cops came, what a moron. If he wasn't drunk, he should have made up something like he was afrain he was going to get linched if anyone found out nearby.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lush72



Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Location: I am Penalty Kick!

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shawner88 wrote:
The guy must have been drunk, why else would he run away? And the fact that he was asleep when the cops came, what a moron. If he wasn't drunk, he should have made up something like he was afrain he was going to get linched if anyone found out nearby.



he was drunk:
JoongAng Daily wrote:
U.S. sergeant to face hit-run indictment

The Suwon District Public Prosecutors Office said yesterday that it would indict a U.S. Army sergeant involved in a hit-and-run accident that left a South Korean woman dead and four others injured on Nov. 28.
According to the U.S. 8th Army, the suspect, Sergeant Jerry Onken, has been handed over to Korean authorities. He will also be charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, the military said. U.S. and Korean authorities conducted a blood alcohol test after the incident.
Assigned to 1-43 Air Defense Artillery Battalion in Suwon, Gyeonggi province, Sergeant Onken has been investigated by South Korean police on charges of leaving an accident scene.
Korea has jurisdiction in the case because Sergeant Onken was not on official business when the accident occurred.


http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200312/06/200312060222089709900090309031.html

This guy actually left his kevlar and Military ID in the car when he ran. Real smart retard. I hope they fry him.

Before anyone decides to flame me- I am a gulf war vet and have served in the 2ID here in Korea. My little sister is in Iraq right now. I am NOT anti-militay. My closest in age sister was killed by a drunk driver when she was 18.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
shawner88



Joined: 01 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't see that more recent story...thanks.


DWI in Korea is .51 I wonder wht this guy blew. Whatever it was, they would have to take the 5 hours into account that he was asleep.

How stupid can you get. If he was going to run away, he should have gotten a yeogwan and turned himself in a few days later and sticking to the story he was afraid Koreans would lynch him. Then again, probably the others involved told everything that happened anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
J.B. Clamence



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shawner88 wrote:
DWI in Korea is .51


Is that a typo? A 140-pound male would need more than 15 drinks to get to that level.

http://beerboozebooks.com/bal.htm

Is it really that high?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawner88



Joined: 01 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J.B. Clamence wrote:
shawner88 wrote:
DWI in Korea is .51


Is that a typo? A 140-pound male would need more than 15 drinks to get to that level.

http://beerboozebooks.com/bal.htm

Is it really that high?



Yeah right, oops. .051 sorry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
just because



Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Location: Changwon - 4964

PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Am I correct in understanding that that this means he'll be tried in a Korean court?


This is true. He is in big trouble!!!! He deserves it to after killing a person while drunk driving.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HardyandTiny



Joined: 03 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just because wrote:
Quote:
Am I correct in understanding that that this means he'll be tried in a Korean court?


This is true. He is in big trouble!!!! He deserves it to after killing a person while drunk driving.

He will most likely be tried in a Korean court. The Koreans have the right to prosecute him in a Korean court, which is not unusual, hundreds of soldiers have been prosecuted in Korean courts over the years.
The Koreans have about 6 weeks to decide whether they will take jurisdiction in the case.
The Koreans also have the right to hold him in custody before and during his Korean trial. This right written into the revised SOFA in ~2001 has never been exercised by the Korean courts.

The families of the victims, especially the woman who died, would be wise to ask the Korea authorities to give full jurisdiction to the US military so that the drunken driver receives proper punishment.
I doubt that he would get more than three years in a Korean court and I'm certain he would get more than twenty years in a US court.

The Thai-Americn male soldier who was found guilty of raping a Korean male soldier this year was sentenced to thirty years in a US military court!
That type of punishment would be unthinkable in a Korean court.

When the US soldier, Specialist Christopher McCarthy, was found guilty of murdering a Korean prostitute back in 2000. He was tried in a Korean court and the Korean judge only sentenced him to 8 years!
What can we expect in a vehicular manslaughter case?

The Japanese are keen to this trick. They always ask for the US military members to be turned over to the US military court when they have the bastard dead to rights.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The families of the victims, especially the woman who died, would be wise to ask the Korea authorities to give full jurisdiction to the US military so that the drunken driver receives proper punishment.
I doubt that he would get more than three years in a Korean court and I'm certain he would get more than twenty years in a US court.


True, but following the schoolgirl debacle, wouldn't it be a bit of a PR bonanza for the US army and the Korean government to have this tried in the Korean courts? Suppose the guy is acquitted by a US court-martial. You'll have the candlelight vigils, flag burnings, etc all over again. But, if he's acquitted by a Korean court, or convicted with a light sentence, the US can turn around and say to the nationalists "What are you guys complaining about? It's YOUR justice system".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HardyandTiny



Joined: 03 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
The families of the victims, especially the woman who died, would be wise to ask the Korea authorities to give full jurisdiction to the US military so that the drunken driver receives proper punishment.
I doubt that he would get more than three years in a Korean court and I'm certain he would get more than twenty years in a US court.


True, but following the schoolgirl debacle, wouldn't it be a bit of a PR bonanza for the US army and the Korean government to have this tried in the Korean courts? Suppose the guy is acquitted by a US court-martial. You'll have the candlelight vigils, flag burnings, etc all over again. But, if he's acquitted by a Korean court, or convicted with a light sentence, the US can turn around and say to the nationalists "What are you guys complaining about? It's YOUR justice system".


If the family of the woman who died in the accident makes the request for US jurisdiction then the Korean government just stresses that it's the family's decision and no one will complain.
The Koreans can't make a complaint about where he is tried or the outcome of any trial. They NOW have the option to try him.

I don't think the US will, or should, make any comments regarding the sentencing in a Korean court. That would begin to make a problem that you want to avoid. The point is that it IS THEIR system.

The more I think about this the more I see the Koreans finding a way to explain to the Korean public why they are giving jurisdiction to the Americans.
Something like "The Americans will punish him more severly because they want to show us that they are guilty............"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the key point in this particular case is that no Korean group has found a way to politicize it. In addition, the scale and intensity of last year's anti-Americanism shocked many Koreans. When Rummie et al decided to move the troops south of the river, a lot of Koreans had to stop and 'take a think' about what they really wanted. And what they really wanted is for someone else to protect them. Like what Roh said: We want to be treated as equals, but not quite THAT equal if it's going to cost us money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
indiercj



Joined: 30 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
I think the key point in this particular case is that no Korean group has found a way to politicize it. In addition, the scale and intensity of last year's anti-Americanism shocked many Koreans. When Rummie et al decided to move the troops south of the river, a lot of Koreans had to stop and 'take a think' about what they really wanted. And what they really wanted is for someone else to protect them. Like what Roh said: We want to be treated as equals, but not quite THAT equal if it's going to cost us money.


link please? Roh said THAT crap?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Joe Thanks



Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Location: Dudleyville

PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:16 pm    Post subject: Re: That hit and run accident with the army guy Reply with quote

shawner88 wrote:
I thought when I first read it, a rage would sweep across the country but it seems to have gone barely noticed.



I'm glad rage hasn't. Sometimes the wheels of justice can prevail and people can calm down.

Mind you, there are no elections coming up and as such, money isn't being doled out to the sh@tdisturbers who will hit the streets.

I'm still wondering where the rage towards the horrible safety standards and corruption of the Daegu subway system - and towards Kim Dae-han disappeared. It was a virtual holocaust with hundreds of Koreans dead.

Koreans slaughtering Koreans seems to get a blind eye.

Must be that 'pure blood.' Pure blood is forgivable.

Sick and sad.

I digress.

Joe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International