View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Zackback
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Location: Kyungbuk
|
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 2:56 pm Post subject: We're Going to Mars! |
|
|
1. Is the thought and pursuit of going to Mars simply a diversion to the filth and mess we created on planet Earth?
2. That's a whole lot of money to simply say "Hey, we were there"!
3. On a lighter note will they be playing the Backyardigans "Mission to Mars" on take off?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU5i_AbRROQ
NASA says setting foot on Mars is 'human destiny'
A view from NASA's Mars rover Curiosity of the 'John Klein' patch of flat rock within Gale Crater's Yellowknife Bay area. Setting foot on Mars by the 2030s is human destiny and a US priority, and every dollar available must be spent on bridging gaps in knowledge on how to get there, NASA's chief said Monday.
A view from NASA's Mars rover Curiosity of the 'John Klein' patch of flat rock within Gale Crater's Yellowknife Bay area. Setting foot on Mars by the 2030s is human destiny and a US priority, and every dollar available must be spent on bridging gaps in knowledge on how to get there, NASA's chief said Monday.
AFP - Setting foot on Mars by the 2030s is human destiny and a US priority, and every dollar available must be spent on bridging gaps in knowledge on how to get there, NASA's chief said Monday.
Addressing a conference of space experts at George Washington University, NASA administrator Charles Bolden said that despite hard economic times the United States is committed to breaking new boundaries in space exploration.
"A human mission to Mars is today the ultimate destination in our solar system for humanity, and it is a priority for NASA. Our entire exploration program is aligned to support this goal," Bolden said.
President Barack Obama has proposed a $17.7 billion dollar budget for NASA in 2014, and he supports a "vibrant and coordinated strategy for Mars exploration," Bolden said.
Among the first steps to sending astronauts to Mars are NASA's plans to capture and relocate an asteroid by 2025, a process that should inform future efforts to send humans into deep space, the former astronaut said.
Also, US astronaut Scott Kelly has volunteered to spend one year at the International Space Station in 2015 to allow doctors to assess how long-duration zero gravity exposure affects bone density, muscle mass and vision.
Currently, a rotating cast of global astronauts each spend a maximum of six months aboard the orbiting outpost.
But despite increasing interest in landing on Mars, and a newly diverse space race that involves many countries instead just of old Cold War foes the United States and Russia, there is plenty that experts just do not know about how to reach Mars.
For instance, there is no existing space vehicle to carry people on the seven-month or longer journey there, not to mention no plan for returning people to Earth.
Medical experts are unsure what the physical ramifications would be for people who attempt to travel in high-radiation environments for such extended periods.
And just how people would survive, breathe, eat and drink on the dry, red planet are significant obstacles that have yet to be overcome.
"The US has demonstrated that we know how to get to the Moon," Bolden said.
"What we have not demonstrated and what I think everyone in this room -- well most people in this room will concede, is that there are technological gaps to sending humans to an asteroid and to Mars," he added.
"And so every single moment of our time and every single dollar of our assets must be dedicated to developing those technologies that allow us to go beyond low Earth orbit, beyond the Moon."
The United States is the only nation that has successfully sent robotic explorers to land on Mars, the most recent being the Curiosity rover which touched down in August 2012.
The first-of-its-kind landing demonstrated that humans have figured out how to send a one-tonne package of machinery to Mars.
But many experts believe that the size of the package needed to maintain a human habitat on Mars would weigh more like 40 tonnes. There also needs to be a suitable flight vehicle, and a type of fuel potent enough to get it there quickly.
Perhaps a precursor to a human landing on Mars would be another rover that would land at an established site, drill down and hopefully find fresh water, said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for the science mission directorate.
"That would also be the beacon that allows subsequent missions to navigate to a very precise landing," said Grunsfeld.
http://www.france24.com/en/20130506-nasa-says-setting-foot-mars-human-destiny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KimchiNinja

Joined: 01 May 2012 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting.
The problem is humans have adapted over millions of years to this specific environment. One sun, a certain level of gravity, the food and water here, the germs here. We aren't adapted for living on other planets nor in space. And of course you gotta live a long time in space before you reach another planet!
Dude could come back all shriveled up for life, or totally space crazy! And do they have porn in the spaceship? These are the questions I ask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
le-paul

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Location: dans la chambre
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont think theres any intention of trying to bring people back at this point. from what i remember, the space agencies doing this research are expecting the travellers to get ripped to pieces by particles because theres no natural shield in the atmosphere of mars.
anyway, i feel this o.post warrants a reply because its big news and is taking us into the future.
however, i dont really have anything to say other than im excited to see what will happen.
who cares how much it costs. more money has been wasted on worse things than this until now. could you really say the money spent on any exploration is a waste to mankind? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
young_clinton
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When are they going to Mars? The public doesn't seem to be interested enough to foot the bill.
Last edited by young_clinton on Wed May 08, 2013 9:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
young_clinton
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KimchiNinja wrote: |
And of course you gotta live a long time in space before you reach another planet! |
Isn't it something like 3 years for Mars?
KimchiNinja wrote: |
And do they have porn in the spaceship? |
"Emmanuelle in Space", what scene would replace the Mosquito netting scene? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FDNY
Joined: 27 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KimchiNinja wrote: |
And do they have porn in the spaceship? |
I heard they will have radio broadband, including porn, for all astronauts. However, the Korean government has already asked for porn to be blocked for any Korean members of the crew. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
le-paul

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Location: dans la chambre
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
why would you need porn? do astronauts even have socks?
how would it be practical?
"damn, whats that flashing red light? could you just nip outside and check on that for me please?"
" thats the 6th time this week!"
"ahem..." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Isn't it something like 3 years for Mars? |
This article says 150-300 days.
Quote: |
why would you need porn? |
Psh, what? Because if it was an all-man mission they'd probably kill each other up there spending nearly two years in capsule without it. I know these guys are always top tier individuals/professionals/geniuses, but I bet they've always stacked astronauts with porn on space missions. I'd probably have difficulty getting my private business done by memory if I hadn't seen a woman in a week; can't imagine trying to do it not seeing one for a year or two. Also, don't they usually abandon the ship and parachute down in a pod when they reenter the earth's atmosphere? I can imagine why, bet there are loose space loads all over that thing, who'd want to clean that?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
augustine wrote: |
Quote: |
Isn't it something like 3 years for Mars? |
This article says 150-300 days.
Quote: |
why would you need porn? |
Psh, what? Because if it was an all-man mission they'd probably kill each other up there spending nearly two years in capsule without it. I know these guys are always top tier individuals/professionals/geniuses, but I bet they've always stacked astronauts with porn on space missions. I'd probably have difficulty getting my private business done by memory if I hadn't seen a woman in a week; can't imagine trying to do it not seeing one for a year or two. Also, don't they usually abandon the ship and parachute down in a pod when they reenter the earth's atmosphere? I can imagine why, bet there are loose space loads all over that thing, who'd want to clean that?  |
Isn't that why NASA subjects potential astronauts to intense psyc' tests? Occasionally they mess up (that women a few years ago), but they want people that will stay sane as long as possible under extreme conditions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jvalmer wrote: |
augustine wrote: |
Quote: |
Isn't it something like 3 years for Mars? |
This article says 150-300 days.
Quote: |
why would you need porn? |
Psh, what? Because if it was an all-man mission they'd probably kill each other up there spending nearly two years in capsule without it. I know these guys are always top tier individuals/professionals/geniuses, but I bet they've always stacked astronauts with porn on space missions. I'd probably have difficulty getting my private business done by memory if I hadn't seen a woman in a week; can't imagine trying to do it not seeing one for a year or two. Also, don't they usually abandon the ship and parachute down in a pod when they reenter the earth's atmosphere? I can imagine why, bet there are loose space loads all over that thing, who'd want to clean that?  |
Isn't that why NASA subjects potential astronauts to intense psyc' tests? Occasionally they mess up (that women a few years ago), but they want people that will stay sane as long as possible under extreme conditions. |
Of course... but they're still human and just like the rest of us their jimmy wakes up before they do every morning telling them to get out there and impregnate something. There's gonna be some buildup when you throw a group of guys on a friggin' space ship for a year or two; they need porn!
And who could forget the kidnapping diaper lady astronaut.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
le-paul

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Location: dans la chambre
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont want to be the wet blanket and ruin the porn thread, but on a serious note, i dont know where youre getting all this 'guys in space' from?
last year, the space agencies were advertising couples to go to mars together ( as a one way trip). i think they considered ye sexual repercussions of being cooped up together. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The number of women on wikipedia's list of apollo astronauts is, wait for it, zero. Though those missions are all old.
The Mars to Stay program is what you're talking about. But I think you'd have to be close to crazy if you wanted to spend the rest of your life on Mars. I doubt that the couples that that program would attract would be the most fit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dodge7
Joined: 21 Oct 2011
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
augustine wrote: |
jvalmer wrote: |
augustine wrote: |
Quote: |
Isn't it something like 3 years for Mars? |
This article says 150-300 days.
Quote: |
why would you need porn? |
Psh, what? Because if it was an all-man mission they'd probably kill each other up there spending nearly two years in capsule without it. I know these guys are always top tier individuals/professionals/geniuses, but I bet they've always stacked astronauts with porn on space missions. I'd probably have difficulty getting my private business done by memory if I hadn't seen a woman in a week; can't imagine trying to do it not seeing one for a year or two. Also, don't they usually abandon the ship and parachute down in a pod when they reenter the earth's atmosphere? I can imagine why, bet there are loose space loads all over that thing, who'd want to clean that?  |
Isn't that why NASA subjects potential astronauts to intense psyc' tests? Occasionally they mess up (that women a few years ago), but they want people that will stay sane as long as possible under extreme conditions. |
Of course... but they're still human and just like the rest of us their jimmy wakes up before they do every morning telling them to get out there and impregnate something. There's gonna be some buildup when you throw a group of guys on a friggin' space ship for a year or two; they need porn!
And who could forget the kidnapping diaper lady astronaut.  |
One does not need porn if they dedicate their life and works to God. I have not viewed porn since I made the decision that it was destructive to my personal relationship with Him and my wife. It has been months and months since I last watched it. If He is working in you and if you earnestly seek His fellowship, His strength will be all that you need to quit that dirty habit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
transmogrifier
Joined: 02 Jan 2012 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newsflash: your decision to give up porn was just that, your decision. You should be proud of YOURSELF, not some puppetmaster within you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That blows, man.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|