| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nowhere Man
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
 Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: Why George W Bush is a good president |
 |
|
No. I have nothing to say.
But maybe I do. In 2004, we voted for more of this.
John Kerry was worse than this?
Either:
A) Explain why George W Bush is a swell president and was the right choice in 2004.
or
B) Explain how Kerry would've made things worse. What horrible things would be happening now?
What would be the difference? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I;ll do neither and the NSA can have my ass (as they already have most of America's).
George Bush is NOT an idiot because he was elected president. He would have been just as much an idiot had he not been elected/re-elected.....
The question of Kerry is redundant/speculative. Who cares about the potatoes we could have had , when we got rotten ones......
The question is..............how do we make soup out of such a potato head????? After all, people still need to feed.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheFonz
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Location: North Georgia
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think Ralph Nader would of made a better president. IMO he fights for just causes. He fights for what he believes in not for who gives him the most money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
capebretoncanadian
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TheFonz wrote: |
| I think Ralph Nader would of made a better president. IMO he fights for just causes. He fights for what he believes in not for who gives him the most money. |
You're right of course....but since when has Nader had a snowballs chance in hell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheFonz
Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Location: North Georgia
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
capebretoncanadian said:
| Quote: |
| You're right of course....but since when has Nader had a snowballs chance in hell? |
All the more reason why I support campaign finance reform. This whole thread is a more or less a wouldn't it be nice if... To quote my mom who was a Bush fan, "You couldn't elect a republican as a dogcatcher in this town". His plan to fix the borders is a joke. Where were these guardsmen when Katrina hit.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: Re: Why George W Bush is a good president |
|
|
| Nowhere Man wrote: |
No. I have nothing to say.
But maybe I do. In 2004, we voted for more of this.
John Kerry was worse than this?
Either:
A) Explain why George W Bush is a swell president and was the right choice in 2004.
or
B) Explain how Kerry would've made things worse. What horrible things would be happening now?
What would be the difference? |
Both would have done more or less the same on most policies.
The big problem is/was the world situation not the president. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Less Bush talks, the better the President he becomes.
He should have stuck with what he REALLY wanted to do in the early 90s: BASEball commissioner. He cares about baseball, he woulda done better at that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
I;ll do neither and the NSA can have my ass (as they already have most of America's).
DD |
A small exaggeration, eh?
I get a kick out of Eurolefties talking about "surveillance" and the "NSA" when they have absolutely no idea the powers that their own governments have to snoop.
Just keep pointing away from yourselves. That will make it all better, right?
In America, when the government gets out of line, as it most certainly has as of late, at least some people fight back. Media, academics, activists and Joe Blow all have their say in some way shape or form. When European governments do the same thing, Eurotrash fools say "what about America!?! Look at Bush!?!"
It is a psychosis.
Back to the OP. I don't think Kerry would have been any better. The problem is government in and of itself. Who is running it makes little difference. Governments get away with whatever they deem themselves able to get away with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satori
Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="BJWD"]
| ddeubel wrote: |
| The problem is government in and of itself. Who is running it makes little difference. Governments get away with whatever they deem themselves able to get away with. |
What about Clintons legacy. I would rate him as one of the most successful presidents in the last 30 years. I think it matters a great deal who is at the helm. Clinton was certainly way better at projecting the US into the world at large dimplomatically. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wangja
Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
| ddeubel wrote: |
I;ll do neither and the NSA can have my ass (as they already have most of America's).
DD |
A small exaggeration, eh?
I get a kick out of Eurolefties talking about "surveillance" and the "NSA" when they have absolutely no idea the powers that their own governments have to snoop.
Just keep pointing away from yourselves. That will make it all better, right?
In America, when the government gets out of line, as it most certainly has as of late, at least some people fight back. Media, academics, activists and Joe Blow all have their say in some way shape or form. When European governments do the same thing, Eurotrash fools say "what about America!?! Look at Bush!?!"
It is a psychosis.
|
You on the right thread????? WTF has that to do with the price of fish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
