| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:35 pm Post subject: Korea Times: How not to be a language imperialist |
|
|
Jesus Tapdancing Christ, this guy's a retard.
| Quote: |
The teacher in South Korea should study Confucianism. That is, if he would truly educate. For education is about teaching people to be their best. In the context of South Korea, that means helping people realize the Confucian ideal. The foreigner here who is ignorant of Confucianism is doomed to indoctrinate into his own point of view; to facilitate his students� loss, of themselves and of their souls, to Western utilitarian values.
To avoid the resentment of many Koreans against English, which they understandably see as a form of Western imperialism, the English teacher�s imperative is to read the Confucian classics: The Great Learning, The Doctrine of the Mean, The Confucian Analects, and The Works of Mencius, especially James Legge�s English translation. The Confucian Analects, at the very least, is the point of departure for meaningful engagement with South Korea.
|
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/opinion/200610/kt2006101920422154060.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thegadfly

Joined: 01 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Um...seems like he is suggesting that foreign teachers should try to understand the philosophy underlying behavior in Korea...the fact that students may not be AWARE that their attitudes are shaped by Confucianism doesn't really matter. Ask a student about the teachings of Confucius and you may get blank stares, but start discussing the appropriate behavior in many situations and they will give answers that mirror those teachings. It helps a teacher to be effective if he or she understands his or her students...Confucianism is pretty foreign to many westerners (who have internalized the Socratic method of teaching and learning without realizing it, which can be at odds with the Confucian attitudes displayed by many students). Reading a few books about a major cultural/philosophical/moral influence seems like a good idea...using that knowledge to more effectively communicate your ideas to your students seems like an even better idea.
Retard? Naw...you just don't like some of the words that he chose to use in order to show how emphatically he believes in his message. The diction in the article is a bit...melodramatic? I will grant that, but the message is definitely valid...solid advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thegadfly wrote: |
Um...seems like he is suggesting that foreign teachers should try to understand the philosophy underlying behavior in Korea...the fact that students may not be AWARE that their attitudes are shaped by Confucianism doesn't really matter. Ask a student about the teachings of Confucius and you may get blank stares, but start discussing the appropriate behavior in many situations and they will give answers that mirror those teachings. It helps a teacher to be effective if he or she understands his or her students...Confucianism is pretty foreign to many westerners (who have internalized the Socratic method of teaching and learning without realizing it, which can be at odds with the Confucian attitudes displayed by many students). Reading a few books about a major cultural/philosophical/moral influence seems like a good idea...using that knowledge to more effectively communicate your ideas to your students seems like an even better idea.
Retard? Naw...you just don't like some of the words that he chose to use in order to show how emphatically he believes in his message. The diction in the article is a bit...melodramatic? I will grant that, but the message is definitely valid...solid advice. |
Naw. The guy's a twit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The writer might try convincing (former president) Kim Dae-Jung that Confucianism ought to stay in Korea. The prez was all for dumping it. It was never clear just how much he wanted to toss out, but he was open about reducing Confucian influence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the_beaver wrote: |
| thegadfly wrote: |
Um...seems like he is suggesting that foreign teachers should try to understand the philosophy underlying behavior in Korea...the fact that students may not be AWARE that their attitudes are shaped by Confucianism doesn't really matter. Ask a student about the teachings of Confucius and you may get blank stares, but start discussing the appropriate behavior in many situations and they will give answers that mirror those teachings. It helps a teacher to be effective if he or she understands his or her students...Confucianism is pretty foreign to many westerners (who have internalized the Socratic method of teaching and learning without realizing it, which can be at odds with the Confucian attitudes displayed by many students). Reading a few books about a major cultural/philosophical/moral influence seems like a good idea...using that knowledge to more effectively communicate your ideas to your students seems like an even better idea.
Retard? Naw...you just don't like some of the words that he chose to use in order to show how emphatically he believes in his message. The diction in the article is a bit...melodramatic? I will grant that, but the message is definitely valid...solid advice. |
Naw. The guy's a twit. |
Agreed. Will we slap immigrants with Plato's The Republic, Voltaire, Dante, Dylan, and Lennon and McCartney at JFK and Vancouver International, on the same principle that those works are "the point of departure for meaningful engagement with North America"?
If they fail the follow-up test, back on the plane. Shoo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mateomiguel
Joined: 16 May 2005
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| can we do that for natives too? If you don't read up, onto the plane. shoo! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I do a pretty good job of trying to understand how things work here, but Confucianism causes more harm than help. Confucianism is not the way to cultural understanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sig line fodder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperHero

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 Location: Superhero Hideout
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the_beaver wrote: |
| thegadfly wrote: |
Um...seems like he is suggesting that foreign teachers should try to understand the philosophy underlying behavior in Korea...the fact that students may not be AWARE that their attitudes are shaped by Confucianism doesn't really matter. Ask a student about the teachings of Confucius and you may get blank stares, but start discussing the appropriate behavior in many situations and they will give answers that mirror those teachings. It helps a teacher to be effective if he or she understands his or her students...Confucianism is pretty foreign to many westerners (who have internalized the Socratic method of teaching and learning without realizing it, which can be at odds with the Confucian attitudes displayed by many students). Reading a few books about a major cultural/philosophical/moral influence seems like a good idea...using that knowledge to more effectively communicate your ideas to your students seems like an even better idea.
Retard? Naw...you just don't like some of the words that he chose to use in order to show how emphatically he believes in his message. The diction in the article is a bit...melodramatic? I will grant that, but the message is definitely valid...solid advice. |
Naw. The guy's a twit. |
substitute an "a" for the i in your last word and you would be more accurate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think incoming teachers should read Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations
...while listening to Lee Hyori at high volumes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Confuscius is one of the most evil men in history. His "philosophy" has brought nothing but pain and suffering for most. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamin
Joined: 21 Jun 2005 Location: Daejon
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Underlying a fairly badly worded opinion is a kernal of truth.
I think it would do teachers in Korea some good to spend some time trying to understand Confucism. How many of us can say that we actually studied and understand the philosophy the underpins this culture?
To live here successfully, one of our goals must be to understand what shapes a Korean's view of the world. That doesn't mean finding what is wrong with those philosophies; doing so is simply another form of cultural imperialism. Let's face it, Koreans don't care if we agree with these cultural matrix but not attempting to intergrate into that matrix will only lead to our own frustation; Korea will simply continue functioning as it has always done so.
Take a some time and study a little. I made the effort and I can more appreciate and understand both a Koreans and my own world view that much better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thegadfly

Joined: 01 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, The Lemon, I think cultural literacy would be important for Koreans who are coming to teach in US schools as well, and I have no problems with your brief list...though I think that in addition, they should be passingly familiar with the Bible, Greek and Roman Mythology, some popular culture icons besides the Beatles, and probably about a few hundred other things. The thing is, a lot of Koreans HAVE studied these things...my students know a lot more about Athena and Zeus than I knew about Heung-bu and Nol-bu when I first came here...they knew that Apollo was the god of the Sun and Artemis the goddess of the moon, and that they were brother and sister, but I didn't know that the SUN is the sister and the MOON is the brother in Korea (they traded places -- initially the sister was the moon, but she became too self-conscious about being stared at, so she took the sun's place, because no one stares directly at the sun...).
Cultural literacy does NOT mean you have to AGREE with what you know, you just have to know about it...there are things with which adult Americans are expected, by society, to have at least a passing familiarity. If you have never heard of Hemingway, don't know who Romeo or Juliet were, never heard of the Ten Commandments...well, you must be living under a rock. Ya dun have to LIKE the stuff, ya just has ta know it exists.
(I said "Americans" because cultural literacy differs by country...though there may be some overlap between what Australians, Canadians, Americans, and other "westerners" ought to know, I wouldn't presume to paint 'em all with the same brush.)
So where do you start acquiring Korean cultural literacy? Korean fables and the writings of Confucius aren't a bad start, but are probably inadequate...so I would say that it would not be enough to just read the few things mentioned in the article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The "Lonely Planet" is another one of the timeless classics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xtchr
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thegadfly wrote: |
but I didn't know that the SUN is the sister and the MOON is the brother in Korea (they traded places -- initially the sister was the moon, but she became too self-conscious about being stared at, so she took the sun's place, because no one stares directly at the sun...).
|
So I guess the staring at others past the point of rudeness thing isn't new then.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|