View previous topic :: View next topic |
Why do some posts fly while others fizzle? |
1. The post is correct, well-written information that needs no follow-up commentary. There's nothing more to say except "Yeah, what he said." |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
2. The post is complete and utter nonsense, and no one wants to waste the energy or bandwidth to even point this out. |
|
33% |
[ 2 ] |
3. No one read the post, for whatever reason. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
4. No one understood the post, but won't ask for clarification, for whatever reason. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
5. No one cares about the post, for whatever reason. |
|
66% |
[ 4 ] |
|
Total Votes : 6 |
|
Author |
Message |
Bondrock

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Location: ^_^
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: Warnock's Dilemma - why do some posts end with a whimper? |
|
|
Warnock's Dilemma - why do some posts fizzle?
---according to Wikipedia, Warnock developed 5 possible reasons why there are no responses to a given post.
Some posts on Dave's ESL are as rusty as a Billy Goat's breakfast while other posts move faster than a chicken in Ethiopia....
please take the poll... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krats1976

Joined: 14 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: Re: Warnock's Dilemma - why do some posts end with a whimper |
|
|
Bondrock wrote: |
Warnock's Dilemma - why do some posts fizzle?
---according to Wikipedia, Warnock developed 5 possible reasons why there are no responses to a given post.
Some posts on Dave's ESL are as rusty as a Billy Goat's breakfast while other posts move faster than a chicken in Ethiopia....
please take the poll... |
Are you talking about a particular post? Because it seems that this Warnock dude was saying that any one of the 5 could be a reason.
As far as I've seen, each of your options above fits one dead thread or another...
So... er... the poll is a bit pointless.
Then again, most of what goes on here at Dave's is a bit pointless... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
periwinkle
Joined: 08 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Depends on subject matter a lot of them time. E.g. any post about Korean girls, or Costco ^^, get a lot of hits and responses. If it's boring or obscure, forget it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I checked . . . sure enough there's a Wikipedia page about that. Bizarre.
I end up killing most of my own threads, so I guess mine just aren't interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sock

Joined: 07 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ha, ha. 'Twould be mighty ironic if this thread too ended with a whimper, nary a vote cast on the poll, leaving one with no answers nor conclusions on the psychology of what makes such posts suck.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always thought that it is the first or second response that makes an OP a hit or not. If someone says something positive or witty, the thread seems to take off. Conversely, if some smart*** troll gets in first, the OP usually dies. I think it creates a bad vibe or something.
As to the poll, all of the options are true but apply to different posts, like has been mentioned. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|