View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
True Samurai
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: Are Samurai Originally Korean |
|
|
Good day. On another thread in which I ask about age being a factor in getting hired in Korea, Smee, noticing my nome de forum remarked:
Quote: |
Some would tell you that "samurai" comes from Korean anyway. |
To which I replied:
Quote: |
What do you mean? Please, do tell. Were there a Korean sort of samurai? Smile |
And kimchi story responded:
Quote: |
Japan was invented by Korea. Of course there was a Korean samurai, they invented Samurai. Yimini |
and SuperFly:
Quote: |
Dunno bout the Samurai, but the guys who made the swords were all Koreans, they were the inventors of the technology. Then the Japanese invaded and "took them all back to Japan" as the story goes...and with them went the "technology" to make these fine Samurai swords... this was the story as I first heard it in May of 1996 |
Now taking SuperFly's comment first, and excuse me if this sounds cynical, but I've been cynical since I learned the truth about Milli Vanilli, and just don't believe anything anymore - Isn't "the guys who made the swords were all Koreans, they were the inventors of the technology. Then the Japanese invaded and "took them all back to Japan" - exactly what the Koreans would say?
I know they have suffered awfully at the hands of the Japanese, the Chinese and the Americans, but Japan has been renowned for 1200 years for its swords and swordcraft, and I, at least, have never heard that the Koreans even made supercool swords - though I suppose they must have in olden times.
And it seems a bit far fetched that the Japanese managed to kidnap all of the Korean swordsmiths. The Japanese are pretty thorough in everything they do, but surely someone would have been left to carry on, some half-grown son of a Korean swordsmith, or his ne'er-do-well drunken brother Il-song, say, who sobered up after the war and cleaned up as the only skilled swordmaker left on the peninsula. Don't you think?
And kimchi story talks about yimini. Is that what Korean samurai are called? Well, yumpin' yimini!
So I thougfht I'd move this whole discussion over here to the off-topic section. I can well believe Korea would have some elite fighting force of its own, and that they followed some Spartan Chan sort of Buddhism, but do they pre-date the Japanese version. Were they nearly as cool?
I really would like to know. I must admit I picked my nome de forum as an affront to Korean culture as I'm very dyed-in-the-wool Japanese in my outlook, the joke will be on me if it turns out there really were Korean samurai that make the Japanese ones look like wooses. My choice of name may be both ironic and prophetic.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, others are way more expert at this . . . but somebody told me that "samurai" comes from 싸움, (ssa-um), a noun meaning "fight." That's all I know about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't think so. The whole bushido thing started up well past the time that Koreans started focusing on poetry.
As for steeling metalworkers (couldn't resist that pun) . . . It's possible, although the history I know deals with stealing potters during the Hideoyoshi invasions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi story

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whew! Well, I'm glad I'm preaching to the converted. My original post was satirical, to set the record straight. But then again, as was proven by Big Bird, my instincts are well educated but still not always to be trusted.
And OMG brother, the truth about Milli Vanilli was hard to take Girl, you know it's true...
Last edited by kimchi story on Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi_pizza
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Location: "Get back on the bus! Here it comes!"
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Samurai actually comes fromt the Japanese word meaning "to serve". Can't think of the exact words...
Also, Korean swords take more after the Chinese style as well as their bows. Japanese swords and bows are distinctly Japanese.
If you're interested Bushido I recommend reading Nitobe Inazo's book. Very interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
superacidjax

Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
the_beaver wrote: |
Don't think so. The whole bushido thing started up well past the time that Koreans started focusing on poetry.
As for steeling metalworkers (couldn't resist that pun) . . . It's possible, although the history I know deals with stealing potters during the Hideoyoshi invasions. |
Did the Japanese steal poets? I think it's a bit ironic that the North Koreans stole Japanese people to help them. I wonder if that's revenge for all of the sword people stolen back in the day.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ancient Korea used to have something vaguely similar to the samurai (young aristocrats trained in the arts, including martial arts):
Hwarang
They had disappeared by the time of the Chosun dynasty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
And when I was told the kidnapping story, we were all quite high on soju and boilermakers. But it was a good story, and I had a good time listening to it...and my hosts were quite generous with the girls at the room salon. I even had first picks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan The Chainsawman

Joined: 05 May 2005
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
bullshito the art of Japanese trade negotiation. Damn effective. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jazblanc77

Joined: 22 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
As someone who practices kumdo, I have to tell you that this is an issue of hot contention. I''l give you a condensed history.
Korea did traditionally use swords in combat, but the traditional martial art was practiced with a double edged sword. Eventually the Japanese develeoped the katana sword which is reputed to be the strongest and most durable sword ever made. Both Korea and China adopted this sword and developed their own styles. While Koreans are believed to have emulated many forms from the Japanese, they also developed Hwa Rang which influenced the development of the warrior class in Japan, the Samurai. However, with the advent of confucianism in the Goryo and Joseon Dynasties, many martial arts, including fencing, archery, and hand-to-hand combat styles began to die out. At that time, it was deemed that those who practiced marital arts were of lower status and only professional military practitioners carried on some of the traditions (many styles and techniques died with their practitioners without being passed on). The demise of Korean martial arts was further aided when the Japanese occupational forces banned their practice by ordinary citizens. The only Korean styles to have survived are the Bonguk Geombeop and the Chosun Se Bup, but all of the other 10 bon/kata (sword forms), are still virtually identical to those used in Japan.
During the most recent Japanese occupation of Korea, fencing was repopularised and Koreans started practicing again as part of the national physical education program. The style that used was Japanese. In the 1920's, korean fencing was given the name kumdo, a modification of the Japanese word, kendo. People who play kumdo are called Kumdoin while those who play kendo are called Kendoka. The modern sport of kumdo is based on those Japanese forms that were brought back to Korea (which you will remember evolved from Haw Rang), but it's practitioners were NEVER Samurai warriors.
*I have tried to locate the names of those Korean warriors who used a double-edged short sword and later the shinai (katana), but I'm afraid I wasn't able to find them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to some historians, hwarang was not what it is often made to be...nor were the samurai, for that matter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JJK1
Joined: 22 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
From what I know, the Koreans didn't give the Japanese the sword but the technology to make them (blacksmithing, steel, other metals etc.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jazblanc77

Joined: 22 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJK1 wrote: |
From what I know, the Koreans didn't give the Japanese the sword but the technology to make them (blacksmithing, steel, other metals etc.) |
The katana sword is completely a Japanese innovation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JJK1
Joined: 22 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jazblanc77 wrote: |
JJK1 wrote: |
From what I know, the Koreans didn't give the Japanese the sword but the technology to make them (blacksmithing, steel, other metals etc.) |
The katana sword is completely a Japanese innovation. |
When did I say otherwise?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hollywoodaction wrote: |
According to some historians, hwarang was not what it is often made to be...nor were the samurai, for that matter. |
About the samurai I have no idea. About the hwarang not much is extant and much of the popular conception of them is made up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|