View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ShoHiro
Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:51 am Post subject: the position of "raw" |
|
|
Dear teachers,
Which is better, (a) or (b)?
(a) John put the meat raw on top of the melon.
(b) John put the meat on top of the melon raw.
In (b), raw refers to not the melon but the meat.
Sincerely,
ShoHiro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pugachevV
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 2295
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
b. is better I think.
Usually,I would say "John put the raw meat on top of the melon." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pugachevV wrote: |
b. is better I think.
Usually,I would say "John put the raw meat on top of the melon." |
I agree. There seems to be no reason to try it another way. This way is very clear. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShoHiro
Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear pugachevV,
Thank you very much.
I understand your point. But my interest is how to use "secondary predicates".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Lorikeet,
Thank you very much.
Do you judge (b) to be more acceptable?
ShoHiro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of the two choices, I prefer b, but I would never say it and doubt I would hear it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShoHiro
Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Lorikeet,
Thank you very much. I see.
How about the following sentence, though they are similar questions?
(1) a. John ate the salad dry.
b. John ate the toast dry.
c. John ordered his salad dry.
Are they acceptable?
ShoHiro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShoHiro
Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: a related question |
|
|
Would you please ask a related question?
Can the sentence (1) be paraphrazed as (2)?
(1) Bill ate a fish whole.
(2) When Bill ate a fish, it was whole.
ShoHiro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShoHiro
Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 65 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:42 am Post subject: further question |
|
|
I would like to know about another case.
You can correctly say (1),
(1) Bill bought these stocks over-the-counter.
(Suppose that the sentence (1) is the answer to the question How did Bill buy those stocks?)
How about (2)?
(2) Bill gave Mary these stocks over-the-counter.
ShoHiro |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
ShoHiro wrote: |
Dear Lorikeet,
Thank you very much. I see.
How about the following sentence, though they are similar questions?
(1) a. John ate the salad dry.
b. John ate the toast dry.
c. John ordered his salad dry.
Are they acceptable?
ShoHiro |
Hmm. I think I might say, "John ate the salad plain." That would mean he didn't put any dressing on it. I don't think I'd use "dry" as an adjective for that. "John ordered his salad plain." would be okay too.
"John ate the toast dry." sounds okay, but as I've said before (I know you are practicing this construction) John ate some dry toast would be okay too. He also ordered a plain salad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:04 am Post subject: Re: a related question |
|
|
ShoHiro wrote: |
Would you please ask a related question?
Can the sentence (1) be paraphrazed as (2)?
(1) Bill ate a fish whole.
(2) When Bill ate a fish, it was whole.
ShoHiro |
"Bill ate a fish whole." sounds okay, but it seems like it would be for a sardine. He just popped the whole fish in his mouth--head, tail, fins, whatever, and ate the fish whole.
Oddly enough, that seems to be to would be different from "Bill ate the whole fish." which means he didn't share it with anyone (but maybe it was a big fish and he was very hungry.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: Re: further question |
|
|
ShoHiro wrote: |
I would like to know about another case.
You can correctly say (1),
(1) Bill bought these stocks over-the-counter.
(Suppose that the sentence (1) is the answer to the question How did Bill buy those stocks?)
How about (2)?
(2) Bill gave Mary these stocks over-the-counter.
ShoHiro |
I had to check what "over-the-counter" meant in talking about stocks. I don't know if sentence 1 is okay, or if you would have to say, "Bill bought these stocks in over-the-counter trading." "Bill bought these over-the-counter stocks." might be okay too.
I don't see how (2) would work. "Bill gave Mary these over-the-counter stocks" might be okay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|