Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

poach

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
learner1



Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:09 am    Post subject: poach Reply with quote

Hello,
She hated the woman who poached her husband.

What does 'poached' mean in the sentence? Is it another way of saying 'took'?

Thank you very much for your reply.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragn



Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 450

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,
Quote:
She hated the woman who poached her husband.
What does 'poached' mean in the sentence? Is it another way of saying 'took'?

Took? Oh yeah. Big time. Wink

If you poach animals, you hunt them illegally and probably in an area where you're not allowed to be. Here, it is being used a little more figuratively. And effectively, I might add.

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
learner1



Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dragn wrote:
And effectively
Hello dragn,

Thank you very much for your reply and what do you mean here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragn



Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 450

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I say she used the word poach effectively, I mean she colored her sentence with shades of meaning and subtle connotations that she couldn't have with almost any other word. By simply choosing the word poach, she paints a vivid mental picture of the other woman stalking her prey, like a hunter; creeping stealthily into her prey's natural habitat; carefully setting a trap and waiting for the precise moment to spring that trap and successfully snaring her illegal catch; marching triumphantly back to camp with the hapless beast roped and tied.

Now, if she had just said the woman took her husband...*poof*...it's all gone. All the vivid imagery and shades of meaning are absent, and we have a limp, boring sentence that merely conveys the essential facts. It's about as expressive and engaging as the mathematical formula for the circumference of a circle. Sad

Welcome to the world of good writing. Here, being grammatically correct is not the goal; it's the beginning.

"If you can say a thing with one stroke, unanswerably you have style." -- George Bernard Shaw

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
learner1



Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello dragn,

It took me longer time to read your post because there were a lot of words in it I didn't know and had to consulted the dictionary! Thank you very much for your detailed explanation about 'poach'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
learner1



Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello dragn,

What's the subtle difference between #1 and #2?

1.She hated the woman who poached her husband.
2.She hated the woman who stole her husband from her.

Thank you very much for your reply.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dragn



Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 450

PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
1.She hated the woman who poached her husband.
2.She hated the woman who stole her husband from her.


They're both actually pretty good sentences. I've already commented on poached, so I'll focus on stole.

Stole is also good here because it emphasizes the idea that the other woman took something that was not hers; it conveys the sense that the other woman is morally corrupt. After all, morally upright people don't steal things, do they? And thieves deserve nothing but contempt, don't they? Indeed, and so stole speaks volumes about the nature of what she did and her character, as well as how the speaker feels toward her. She feels that she's been violated. She feels that she's been robbed of something valuable by a dirty, rotten, no-good thief.

Hope this helps.

Greg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
learner1



Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you very much for your great comment about 'stole' here, dragn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group