| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jasonlulu_2000
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 879
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:00 pm Post subject: have got to |
|
|
She may _________ leave if she doesn't obey the rule.
A. have got to B. have to
I think both are right, aren't they?
Although they come from different backgrounds, they became close friends.
Shall I say instead as follows,
Although they came from different backgrounds, they became close friends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dragn
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
She may _________ leave if she doesn't obey the rule.
A. have got to B. have to
I think both are right, aren't they? |
No. (A) is completely wrong. (B) is right.
She may have to leave if she doesn't obey the rule.
That is, if she doesn't obey the rule, it may be necessary for her to leave.
There is simply no possible way to use the phrase "may have got to" in any sentence. The phrase "have/has got to" cannot be used after any modal. May has to be removed.
| Quote: |
Although they come from different backgrounds, they became close friends.
Shall I say instead as follows,
Although they came from different backgrounds, they became close friends. |
Shall you? My goodness, aren't we formal!
Can you? Yes, absolutely.
Both are grammatically correct. Using present tense seems to emphasize the fact that these two people are still friends today (and their backgrounds obviously haven't changed). Using past tense seems to emphasize that these two people were friends in the past. Who knows...maybe they lived in the 17th century. It's just a subtle difference in emphasis.
Hope this makes sense.
Greg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redset
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 582 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's B, because then you end up with she may have to leave (it's possible that she will be required to leave). Compare that with she has got to leave (she is required to leave). She has got to leave is definite, there's no may about it! And without the may you need to inflect have to match the pronoun: she has.
As for your other sentences, either is fine. When you talk about where someone comes from you're talking about the place they were born, where they grew up, where they usually live or their family background. (You can also simply talk about where someone is from, and use came from to talk about their background in the past.) The tenses don't need to agree - they come from different backgrounds (this refers to a present state) but they became friends (at some point in the past).
EDIT: beaten by Greg! But at least I can say that shall is pretty common in British English  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jasonlulu_2000
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 Posts: 879
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:07 pm Post subject: thank you |
|
|
| Thank you, both. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dragn
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, sorry. That's what invariably happens to me at usingenglish.com. You have to be fast to get in a post on that forum!
Greg
P.S. Yeah, we think using shall too much makes you sound British.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|