| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fromountosea
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:00 pm Post subject: in which foreign languages to be learnt |
|
|
Derek found an ideal environment ( ).
(a) in which to learn foreign languages
(b) in which foreign languages to be learnt
Which of the two is correct to put in the parentesis?
The answer is (a). I understand (a) is correct. But I cannot find out why (b) is incorrect.
Please tell me why.
Thanks in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redset
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 582 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(b) in which foreign languages to be learnt
The bold part is a passive phrase, but it's incomplete. There are a few ways to correct it:
in which foreign languages are/were to be learnt
in which there are/were foreign languages to be learnt
Or we can drop the to and use a modal auxialiary verb instead:
in which foreign languages could/would/must/will be learnt
These all make the passive phrase grammatically correct, but they all have slightly different meanings compared to (a), which is an active structure (Derek intended to learn foreign languages, and found an ideal environment in which to do this). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fromountosea
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 6:02 pm Post subject: not a sentence but a noun phrase |
|
|
| Thank you, redset. for your explanation. My understanding is that the part after "in which" should be a sentence or to infinitive. In case of (b), "foreign languages to be learnt" is not a sentence but a noun phrase. That's why it is incomplete. Am I right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|