| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
humpty
Joined: 02 Apr 2014 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:02 am Post subject: Inversion and non-defining relative clauses |
|
|
Hi,
Could you please help me on the following?
I think that the following sentence is incorrect, but I don't know how to explain it in grammar terms. Inversion + aux.verb + subject + comma + non-defining relative clause + comma + mais verb. The verb form (does suspect) was split by the relative clause:
"Little does my friend, who is an English teacher in China, suspect that he is about to lose his job."
Thanks.
Best
H. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IanT
Joined: 13 Sep 2012 Posts: 340 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's correct. Clumsy, but not wrong. If you take out the non-defining clause it reads fine.
Best wishes,
Ian _________________ All my answers refer to British English.
www.EnglishSwearing.com - How to use all the bad words! ... and ... www.throdworld.com - Silly verses to make you happy.
You decide the price for both! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
humpty
Joined: 02 Apr 2014 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you.
You said well: "If your take out the relative clause, it reads fine." That's my point precisely. And if you don't take it out? Can we accept it as it is? Is it correct to split the verb as it is?
Thanks.
H. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|