|
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:11 am Post subject: An Iraqi's Tribute to American Soldiers. |
|
|
Below is a weblink showing the statue that was made by an Iraqi sculpture named Kalat. He made this statue as a tribute to the American soldiers. Kalat is an Iraqi artist who for years was forced by Saddam Hussein to make the many hundreds of bronze busts of Saddam that dotted Baghdad. This artist was so grateful that the Americans liberated his country, he melted 3 of the fallen Saddam heads and made a memorial statue dedicated to the American soldiers and their fallen comrades. Kalat worked on this night and day for several months. To the left of the kneeling soldier is a small Iraqi girl giving the soldier comfort as he mourns the loss of his comrade in arms. It is currently on display outside the palace that is now home to the 4th Infantry division. It will eventually be shipped and shown at the memorial museum in Fort Hood, Texas.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/arts/kalat.asp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
general_delta
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:30 pm Post subject: Iraq |
|
|
Below is also a weblink Of a video of Americans shooting a wounded Iraqi afterwards that soilder said "oh yeh That was awesome lets do it again". Artworks may decieve but I think the truth and live footage is stronger than any artwork.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5365.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:29 am Post subject: Re: Iraq |
|
|
general_delta wrote: |
Below is also a weblink Of a video of Americans shooting a wounded Iraqi afterwards that soilder said "oh yeh That was awesome lets do it again". Artworks may decieve but I think the truth and live footage is stronger than any artwork.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5365.htm |
And where is the entire transcript, General Delta? Why did you provide a weblink that only shows a very small part of the transcript????? Why didn't you provide the ENTIRE transcript?????
The informationclearinghouse weblink that YOU provided only showed a very small part of the transcript that was aired on CNN on October 26, 2003. Where is the rest of the transcript, General Delta? Why was that left out?
For those people who want to know the truth, the entire transcript that was aired on CNN Presents: Fit to kill aired on October 26, 2003 is found on the weblink below. The entire transcript will show the reader what a soldier goes through as he confronts the enemy, what he is taught, what dangers he faces as his life is threatened in battle, and his reaction to all these during the heat of battle and the aftermath. It will show you what a dangerous and stressful work a soldier has and how he deals and copes with it. It shows the reader the grim realities of war in the eyes of the soldier and how a soldier reacts to survive it. The weblink below provides the ORIGINAL and FULL transcript from CNN.
http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0310/26/cp.00.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diglossia
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From CNN?!?!?!? Oh my god, if it's from CNN then it must be 100% unbiased, right?
Forgive me sarcasm.
I remember a certain person boldly asking me "Where were you when...?" I could ask the same of you Diana. CNN's reputation has been shot ever since the beginning of this war. If this is the source of all you believe regarding Iraq, I beg you to check another source. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Diglossia wrote: |
From CNN?!?!?!? Oh my god, if it's from CNN then it must be 100% unbiased, right?
Forgive me sarcasm.
I remember a certain person boldly asking me "Where were you when...?" I could ask the same of you Diana. CNN's reputation has been shot ever since the beginning of this war. If this is the source of all you believe regarding Iraq, I beg you to check another source. |
Actually, Diglossia, if you look closely at the weblink that General Delta provided, they were the ones who got the information from CNN. It was General Delta who provided a weblink that used CNN as their source. Perhaps, you should tell General Delta that CNN's reputation has been shot since it was he who provided that weblink in the first place. His weblink only took a very small part of the transcript of CNN out of context and placed it on their website. I was the one who provided a weblink of the entire transcript. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diglossia
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But it's YOU I wanted to talk to, Diana. YOU're the one who's posting the most here and you're also the only one bothering to defend Bush, the body count so far in Iraq, and the fact that the reason behind the war doesn't exist.
To hear that you might have gotten any or all of your info from CNN is a great disappointment.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Diglossia wrote: |
But it's YOU I wanted to talk to, Diana. YOU're the one who's posting the most here and you're also the only one bothering to defend Bush, the body count so far in Iraq, and the fact that the reason behind the war doesn't exist.
To hear that you might have gotten any or all of your info from CNN is a great disappointment.  |
Actually, Diglossia, I am not the only one here who supports the US-led war. Pugachev V. and Asterix also supports it if you had read their post.
Also, as I said it was General Delta who got his information from a website that used CNN as their source. I started this thread by showing that an Iraqi artist built a memorial tribute for the American soldiers, and as anyone can see, my source of information wasn't even from CNN.
It was General Delta who provided a weblink that used CNN as their source of information. I only provided the entire transcript that was left out in the weblink that General Delta provided. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diglossia
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hypercorrections demonstrate only how limited your already-closed mind can be, Diana. ("the one who's posting the most" vs "I am not the only one here who supports the US-led war" = not related) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Diglossia wrote: |
Hypercorrections demonstrate only how limited your already-closed mind can be, Diana. ("the one who's posting the most" vs "I am not the only one here who supports the US-led war" = not related) |
Diglossia, why are you calling me "closed-minded?" Do you see me calling YOU names about your mind or head? Why don't you just stick to the topic of discussion instead of attacking the person? The moment one resorts to attacking the person instead of discussing the subject matter, then that is the moment one loses the debate.
Your comment says that I was the ONLY one who supports the US-led occupation, which is actually false, and that is what I pointed out to you. The fact that I post more has no relevancy on how many people supports the US-led war or not. Perhaps, you have a problem with the fact that I post more rather than what my opinions contain? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diglossia
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
"The moment one resorts to attacking the person (Iraq) instead of discussing the subject matter, then that is the moment one loses the debate (United States)."
A direct quote from Diana.
Finally, we agree on something! I'm glad my point finally came across! The US administration didn't "speak" to Iraq enough before jumping the gun and prematurely attacking Iraq and finding out that there were no reasons to believe Iraq was a threat to the AMerican people!
I can't believe I got you to say those exact words. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
somuch
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
~~EXACTLY!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RebeccaGMW
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 Posts: 51 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
How many more years of Saddam mistreating the Iraqi people should the US have tolerated?
You said in an earlier post that "to stop defending Bush wouldn't equal supporting 'the axis of evil'" what else are we left to believe when you make comments like this "The US administration didn't "speak" to Iraq enough before jumping the gun and prematurely attacking Iraq and finding out that there were no reasons to believe Iraq was a threat to the AMerican people!"
Your posts have done little more than attempt to insult Diana. She has more supporters on here (and so does Bush, the U.S., the troops, the administration) then you know of. _________________ FREE English Help
Online and Email Tutoring
Writing Help, Too!
http://www.guidemywords.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diglossia
Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My only point to one person in particular (and anybody who needs reminding) is that nobody's perfect. Bush certainly isn't . The way he approached this war wasn't and, no, of course Saddam isn't. Diana is defending almost every aspect of all American involvement from Bush (who some feel isn't actually a 'president' at all) to the soldiers on the ground in Iraq.
Although the "dictator" argument referring to Saddam is the new defense, when the original reason Bush used to justify his going down there were 'weapons of mass destruction', is absolutely silly. The world is full of dictators who are presently mistreating their own people. If the Bush administration was so holey, why wouldn't it help all nations get rid of their dictators?
That's for you to try to answer, really, but many figure that the reason is because it has nothing to do with Saddam and more to do with profit and gain (no matter how little the amount oil is)
And I'll admit, teasing Diana is fun! I know she's tough and can take way more than I'm dishing out, right Diana? Besides, I think something tells me she loves defending Bush/the war anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Diglossia wrote: |
"The moment one resorts to attacking the person (Iraq) instead of discussing the subject matter, then that is the moment one loses the debate (United States)."
A direct quote from Diana.
Finally, we agree on something! I'm glad my point finally came across! The US administration didn't "speak" to Iraq enough before jumping the gun and prematurely attacking Iraq and finding out that there were no reasons to believe Iraq was a threat to the AMerican people!
I can't believe I got you to say those exact words. |
And exactly how do you equate a person to a country?????? Since when is an individual person considered an ENTIRE country???? Diglossia, you make me laugh!!! Can you imagine that!!!! I'm being compared to an entire country!! LOL!!! Even my own opinions is compared to an entire country!!!! LOL!! This is so funny! You make me feel so powerful rather than a simple individual. LOL! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Diana
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 494 Location: Guam, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, I've often showed how the MAJORITY of the Iraqis are happier today than they were under Saddam. I've posted Iraqi opinions and an Iraqi's tribute to American soldiers. I do this because I do consider these people's opinions more important than anyones because it is there country. And right now, a majority of Iraqis are happier today without Saddam. Both the Iraqis and the coalition are working together in rebuilding their country and in getting rid of the terrorists who are not only attacking US troops but Iraqis as well. And if anyone has bothered to read the Iraqi blogsites, many Iraqis are saying that they are against Sadr and his militia. Below is what an Iraqi named Ali posted about his conversation with a cab driver as he was on his way home from work.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, May 19, 2004
It's about time.
Few days ago, I was riding a cap from work to my home. The driver as expected tried to start a chat. I was too tired and not in the mood to join him. There was a traffic jam that obviously annoyed him and the weather was hot as expected in a May noon. He said, "Baghdad has become impossible" this has become a usual phrase to start a conversation. It�s the synonym for the British �looks like a nice weather today�. I was becoming sick of complaints that usually start with this phrase. I said to myself, "Oh my god not another American hater" I didn�t want to reply but I thought it might help to pass time so I answered, �When was Baghdad �possible�?� the driver replied, �yes, life was always hard but these days they�ve become intolerable�
-Because of the Americans, you mean?
-No, of course not. Because of the difficulties in work.
-What do you mean? I know that you now charge double or triple the fees while cars and spare parts are cheaper now than ever.
-Yes, but the hours we can work in have decreased considerably because of the bad security conditions.
-What bad security conditions!? You are still afraid that someone might rob your car and get away with it in such a traffic jam??
-Of course not, but I can�t work for a late hour.
-I understand your fears but I always have known this place to be busy until midnight.
-That�s true but not in my neighborhood, so I have to go back much earlier than that
-Where do you live?
-In Sadr city.
-Oh I see, but what do you think the cause of this insecurity?
-Is that a question?? They are those thugs and thieves.
-Who are those?!
-Sadr followers.
-I agree, but I don�t understand your people there. Why do they support them!?
-Do you really believe that?? I swear to God they are no more than a couple of thousands terrorizing millions and hiding behind slogans like jihad and resistance. The whole city has got sick and tired of their doings. We just want to work, feed our children and take a break. We are tired of all this *beep*. They can�t deceive us anymore.
This idiot is taking advantage of his father�s name and we know the people who are gathering around him. Most of them are gangsters and ex-convicts with some foolish teenagers. They are anything but Muslims. Every now and then one of these cowards come hiding his face and fire against the American troops and when the Americans respond innocents get hurt.
I was encouraged by his attitude and asked:
-Why don�t you try to do something about it?
-Who says we aren�t? I�m one of the people who reported some members of the Mahdi army to the IP and now they are in prison.
-Really!? God bless you. That was brave of you. These people really belong there.
-Sure they do! Did this idiot forget who killed his father!? And who took his revenge? Could he have ever raised his voice if it wasn�t for the same people whom he�s fighting now? Well let the Iranians help him now! Believe me brother when I say that the majority of Sadr city people are grateful for the Americans. We didn�t fire a bullet at them when they entered our city. We gave them the reception of liberators and they are. Why would we fight them now!?
From my experience, I kind of believed him. I worked as a resident doctor in one of the major hospitals in Sadr city for about 6 months at Saddam�s times, and I can say that there were many lost youths there who didn�t know what to do with their lives out of poverty and oppression, and some of them ended being part of the criminal world. Yet along with this dark picture, there were always good and simple people who worked and toiled day and night for a decent life and these were the majority among those I met. Most of those were old men and women.
I witnessed one of those days a scene that I will never forget. A middle aged man was selling Pepsi on the sidewalk near the hospital where I worked, as many people there selling cigarettes and different stuff taking benefit of the high activity and traffic near the hospital and since obviously they couldn�t afford to buy or rent a store. Suddenly there was a big clamor and people were shouting, collecting all what they can and running away. It appeared that there was a patrol of city hall inspectors to watch for any violation. Everyone was gone with his or her goods except this guy who was selling Pepsi. His goods were too heavy to carry and he stood there with desperation and bewilderment on his face. The police reached to his place and the officer looked at him sternly as he said �don�t you know it�s prohibited to use the sidewalk to sell anything?� the guy was totally helpless. His face turned pale and it was as if he was going to be executed. He pleaded to the officer and said, �May god bless you Sir. I had to borrow money to buy these, and I have a family to feed. This is my first day in this job and I haven�t paid what I owe people yet. Please spare me this time so that I can pay the people their money back and I promise I�ll never do it again� he was literally crying and chocking with tears as he managed to say these words. The officer showed no sign that he even cared to hear and ordered his men to smash all the bottles. The poor guy sat there crying as he watched what seemed to be his last hope in an honest life going down the drain. He couldn�t take it anymore and shouted at them �HOW AM I GOING TO FEED MY KIDS?? Do you want me to become a thief!?� the officer looked at him shocked and said �how dare you?? One more word and you�ll never see the light again, you dog� I don�t know what happened to that man, but I would be surprised if he didn�t become a criminal.
After the war, most of the people of Sadr city were so happy; they got rid of their oppressor, they enjoyed freedom of speech and performing their religious ceremonies. Most important is that the raise in the average income opened the door for the private businesses, including the small ones, to prosper. Young men can make a good living by several means without resorting to violence or breaking the law. Things were going just fine and improving when young Sadr started his revolt. Sadr city became insecure again and businesses were damaged seriously as a result. In the early days of that revolt, people sympathized with that idiot because they loved his father, but as his followers� behavior became intolerable and as the lives of people and their jobs were jeopardized, they lost all sympathy with him and all they want now is peace so that they can go back to their works again.
That taxi driver was not the only one from Sadr city with such opinion. Most of the people I�ve met lately expressed the same view. The only people, who don�t want Muqtada to be arrested, are the senior She�at clerics including Sistani. This may look strange when put in context with the relation they have with Iran�s puppet. He always harassed them and tried to take the lead in the streets. He even tried to force Sistani to leave Iraq. Yet, they don�t want him to be arrested. They wouldn�t care much if he was killed, in fact some of them are fighting him already (Thulfiqar organization, another name to Badr legion) but arresting him would be a serious blow to them.
Those clerics do not sympathies with Sadr out of religious sentiments. They know very well that he�s not a pious guy and they often hate each other as they compete to gain the trust and lead of the common people. This meant huge money in the past and now it means money and power as some of them have entered politics now. Why would they care so much then?
I think the answer lies in one fact. There�s an unwritten law in most of the countries with considerable She�at presence that has always considered the clerics to be immune to the law. This doesn�t apply to all clerics, but only the very senior ones. With time, this law has expanded to protect most popular clerics. Now, Muqtada is certainly not a senior cleric, but his family name and the sacrifices they gave, gave him some holy shape in the eyes of some of the She�at. If this guy was arrested, this law would not be literally broken, but the event will have the same effect. Meaning every cleric will know that he is not above the law. This will be an innovation that will shake all clerics with political ambitions. Hence all this crap about "red lines" winch is no more than a big lie that should fool no one. People will certainly be saddened and some would be outraged if the holy shrines were affected, but their care about their lives and jobs certainly is more. Most She'at Iraqis are sentimental when it comes to religion, but not to that degree. The operation should go on with great care however, and will put all those hypocrites in their right places. No more adventures and no more Mahdi armies. This revolt can actually act as an immunization against more serious ones in the future that is if it was dealt with in the proper way. The patience of the coalition has paid its fruits and Muqtada should be *arrested* but certainly not killed and now, in my opinion, is the right time.
By Ali.
http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|