|
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:45 am Post subject: correct a sentence (subjunctive) 2 |
|
|
Dear teachers,
Here is another question about correctness:
On the web I read that we can say "It's high time we send (and not sent) him a registered letter"
whether with the expression 'it's about time' we can only use the subjunctive = "It's about time you spent (and not spend) a little less money."
Is this true ? Here the explanation I have found on a website:
"This is another of those cases of "real" and "unreal" conditionals, which in more rational languages would be regulated by subjunctive standards. The issue is how fully the speaker expects the action to happen. If there's a real intention to send that registered letter now that the reminder has been issued, then the verb is present. If the speaker has some doubt that we'll ever get around to sending the letter after all, then the verb is past:
� "It's high time we send him a registered letter." = a plan to do something, a "real" condition for a future action.
� "It's high time we sent him a registered letter." = a regret that we haven't done something, more focus on the past non-action, and a wishful thought about the future action that may or may not take place�an "unreal" (or unsure) condition for a future action.
As for "It's about time," I can't give a grammatical reason why it never sounds right followed by the present. The explanation must be semantic: "about time" seems to move backward more, drawing in shadows of the time that's been spent already, while "high time" seems more neutral, able to be look both ways depending on the speaker's attitude. "
Do you agree?
All the best,
Hela |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
helen1
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Hela,
Quote: |
whether with the expression 'it's about time' we can only use the subjunctive = "It's about time you spent (and not spend) a little less money." |
Both forms can be used, and in fact to my mind (although I may be wrong) these are different forms of the subjunctive. the infinitive 'spend' expressions of a proposal, demand, resolution whereas the past form 'spent' is more hypothetical and may indicate that the speaker does not have 'authority' over the listener and/or is uncertain the listener will follow the advice.
Quote: |
"It's high time we send (and not sent) him a registered letter"
"This is another of those cases of "real" and "unreal" conditionals, which in more rational languages would be regulated by subjunctive standards. The issue is how fully the speaker expects the action to happen. If there's a real intention to send that registered letter now that the reminder has been issued, then the verb is present. If the speaker has some doubt that we'll ever get around to sending the letter after all, then the verb is past:
� "It's high time we send him a registered letter." = a plan to do something, a "real" condition for a future action.
� "It's high time we sent him a registered letter." = a regret that we haven't done something, more focus on the past non-action, and a wishful thought about the future action that may or may not take place�an "unreal" (or unsure) condition for a future action. |
Although I agree to a certain extent with the explanation you found on the web, I would add a possibility of 'authority' in the 'present' form of the verb. The interpretation is determined by the relationship between speaker and listener.
Quote: |
As for "It's about time," I can't give a grammatical reason why it never sounds right followed by the present. The explanation must be semantic: "about time" seems to move backward more, drawing in shadows of the time that's been spent already, while "high time" seems more neutral, able to be look both ways depending on the speaker's attitude. " |
I would not agree with this part. About time although referring to the amount of time which has passed, is focusing on NOW and therefore to me does sound right when followed by the present.
Hope this helps
Helen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Helen,
Would you please do me an immense favour ? If ever you know an expert in linguistics in your university would you please ask him/her the question ? I really want to know how to use these expressions properly and if the verbs that follow them should be in the SUBJUNCTIVE (present or past) or the INDICATIVE mood.
(By the way is it true that the CONDITIONAL is NOT a mood in English?)
For example: Do we say:
a) "It is high time she WAS in bed / WENT to bed" (indicative)
b) "It is high time she WERE in bed / WENT to bed" (subjunctive)
c) "It is about time she WAS / WERE in bed."
d) "It's high / about time she SHOULD BE in bed." ?
If more than one possibility can be used would you please tell me in which circumstances each of them may appear ?
Thank you very much indeed for your help.
Hela |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|