Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Some questions concerning certain expressions
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Learning English
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
advoca



Joined: 09 Oct 2003
Posts: 422
Location: Beijing

PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:18 pm    Post subject: Re: altogether Reply with quote

iitimone7 wrote:
correct in the meanings, asterix, but altogether is not a real word...it was made up many, many years ago by people who are lazy in their english speech


Itimone 7,

Be assured, "altogether" is a genuine real and fully accepted word. It is found in all modern dictionaries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sina



Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 117
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

Quote:
Hey, your written English is better than a lot of native speakers.


Is it really true? Embarassed That would be great...because I think of studying english after I have spent an entire year in America!! Very Happy

Wow, you are living in California?! It is pretty fascinating and interesting, isn't it? I really envy you... Mad

By the way, I've got a question again. I think I've asked it before but actually I haven't got it.... Confused The problem concludes the usage of is to be or was to be...As a matter of fact, I don't know when I need to use is to be and when I have to use the other term.

What about the term "as a matter of fact"?

Thanks again! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iitimone7



Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 400
Location: Indiana, USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:51 am    Post subject: all Reply with quote

since there are hundreds of modern dictionaries, it sure didn't take you long to check every one of them...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bob S.



Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Posts: 1767
Location: So. Cal

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sina wrote:
...California?! It is pretty fascinating and interesting, isn't it?

So-so. Earthquakes, wild fires, race riots, horrendous traffic, rampant violence and crime (some neighborhoods are war zones you dare not enter).

But the weather is nice. Cool

Quote:
As a matter of fact, I don't know when I need to use is to be and when I have to use the other term.

In most cases, was meant to be will serve you since it refers to an event that has already happened (the couple got together {past tense}). Is meant to be would be used to something that is happening now or will happen in the future (the couple is getting together or they are existing now as a couple). But even then, the past tense (was meant...) can still be used. There's no hard and fast rule about it.


Quote:
What about the term "as a matter of fact"?

You used it fine in your previous post. What are you asking? As a matter of fact, it looks like you know it fine! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sina



Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 117
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey,
I haven't been quite sure about the expression "as a matter of fact"....that's why I asked.. Embarassed

Quote:
In most cases, was meant to be will serve you since it refers to an event that has already happened (the couple got together {past tense}). Is meant to be would be used to something that is happening now or will happen in the future (the couple is getting together or they are existing now as a couple). But even then, the past tense (was meant...) can still be used. There's no hard and fast rule about it.


Bob, does it actually have to be that way: was meant to be...because I always read it without that meant... Confused But otherwise, you explained it well... Very Happy Thanks again. I've got so many questions that I certainly irritate you......Hope not... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob S.



Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Posts: 1767
Location: So. Cal

PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sina wrote:
does it actually have to be that way: was meant to be...because I always read it without that meant... Confused

It doesn't always have to have "meant", though it sounds better when refering to couples that appear to be a good match. I usually hear it with "meant". For an event, you can also say "It was bound to happen."

BTW, from Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary:
Main Entry: 1al�to�geth�er
Pronunciation: "ol-t&-'ge-[th]&r
Function: adverb
Etymology: Middle English altogedere, from al all + togedere together
1 : WHOLLY, COMPLETELY <an altogether different problem>
2 : in all : ALL TOLD <spent a hundred dollars altogether>
3 : on the whole
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Learning English All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group