Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

why use participial phrase in this sentence?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
greenbow43



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 8:23 pm    Post subject: why use participial phrase in this sentence? Reply with quote

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipa�tion, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

can i change the sentence as follows:

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipa�tion, and set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property

do i change the meaning???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kristea



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:54 pm    Post subject: Re: why use participial phrase in this sentence? Reply with quote

greenbow43 wrote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipa�tion, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

can i change the sentence as follows:

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipa�tion, and set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property

do i change the meaning???


The meaning does change with the "and set free" added. The original context ties the filing with the freeing tightly. (They would not have been free without the signing of the papers. By saying "and set free" it makes the two events less closely tied - related but there is now a possiblity that the two events are independant of each other which is not the orginial, and histroical, context.

Hope that helps - Kristi
_________________
"That man is a success who has lived well, laughed often and loved much." R.L. Stevenson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
greenbow43



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing
thank you so much
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group