| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fw
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 361
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: Which is more natural? (5) |
|
|
Hello everyone.
If sentence #1 is rewritten, which is more natural, #2 or #3?
1. The baby did not stop crying until he was fed.
2. It was not until the baby stopped crying that he was fed.
3. It was not until he stopped crying that the baby was fed.
Best regards,
Fw |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sirius
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Posts: 119 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would say neither.
Both 2 and 3 presume that they waited for the baby to stop crying before feeding him. In fact, the feeding is what stopped the crying.
If you wanted to rewrite it
It was not until he was fed that the baby stopped crying |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fw
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 361
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, sirius, I made an arror.
My question should have been:
If sentence #1 is rewritten, which is more natural, #2 or #3?
1. The baby did not stop crying until he was fed.
2. It was not until the baby was fed that he stopped crying.
3. It was not until he was fed that the baby stopped crying.
Do I understand you chose #3?
fw |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sirius
Joined: 11 Dec 2005 Posts: 119 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The new Number 2 is different and would be fine |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KazAV
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Posts: 151 Location: Brit in Bonn, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Both are fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|