| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
syoshioka99
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 185 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:22 am Post subject: Our dog (was missing/ had been missing/ had missed) for many |
|
|
問3 Our dog ( ) for many weeks, but in the end she came back.
① has missed ② missed ③ was missing ④ was to miss(Question)
I think the answer is③. Can I use "had been missing" or "had missed" instead of③?
Tochigi, JAPAN
Satoru |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alan.es
Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
No. 3 is correct. You can use "had been missing" but not "had missed.
The dog is the subject in a passive sentence so the verb 'to be' has to be used. Otherwise you would be saying something like , "the dog had missed the bus " rather than meaning that 'she was lost'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
syoshioka99
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 185 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:27 am Post subject: Thanks, alan.es |
|
|
Our dog (was missing/ had been missing) for many weeks, but in the end she came back.
(Further Question)
You told me both are correct, but what is the difference between the two?
Are they identical?
Tochigi, Japan
Satoru |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alan.es
Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's no real difference in meaning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pavilion
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 75 Location: US
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, the are identical. The difference is was missing is simple past tense, and had been missing is past perfect tense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
janechou111
Joined: 27 Dec 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Further questions...
Why can't I say the sentence "My dog had missed for many days, but in the end she came back." ?
Besides, the sentence "My dog had been missing for many days,..."
is not a passive sentence, is it?
Thanks in advance
jane
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alan.es
Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry , you're quite right, it's not a passive.
The transitive verb 'to miss' has several meanings. The two main ones are:
1.failure to hit a target or objective
2.Feel bad or sorry about the absence of a person or being away from a place.
In this case you want to say that the dog was lost. You didn't know where it was. So:
to be missing - someone or something cannot be found, it's lost.
It's the verb 'to be' and the gerund as adjective 'missing'.
You can say:
I had missed the dog - but this means that you were sad because it wasn't with you - or - you tried to hit it but failed to do so.
also - the dog had missed me - which now means the dog felt sad because it wasn't with me - or- the dog tried to attack me but it failed.
In each case there needs to be a complement/object to the verb 'miss'.
It's only when we use the verb 'to be' and 'missing' together that it means 'to be lost'.
I hope that explains it correctly now.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|