| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Teo

Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 193 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: omission of FOR |
|
|
1. I once studied the guitar three years.
2. That house has been empty six months.
3. We go away three weeks every summer.
4. My boss will be in Italy the next ten days.
5. I'm going to Canada the summer.
Which of the above sentences is NOT acceptable? _________________ Thank you very much for your reply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrPedantic
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 116 Location: Southern England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Teo
To me, they sound as follows:
1. I once studied the guitar three years. ] Not acceptable.
2. That house has been empty six months. ] I'd prefer "for 6 months"; but you do sometimes hear this choppier adverbial formation, so I wouldn't rule it out.
3. We go away three weeks every summer. ] Again, I'd prefer "for three weeks". It seems to move a little closer to oddness than #2.
4. My boss will be in Italy the next ten days. ] As for #2 and #3.
5. I'm going to Canada the summer. ] No; this has an air of BabelFish.
MrP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|