Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Help - composition about terrorism

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ClarissaMach



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 644
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:43 am    Post subject: Help - composition about terrorism Reply with quote

Could somebody helping me correcting the mistakes in this composition?

By the way, is there an specific forum for those that would like to practice writting, like some kind of "Essay club"? If there is, please, let me know!

Here is the text:

Although �terrorism� has only become a common word in the daily vocabulary of most of us after the terrorist attacks that took place in New York City in September 11, 2001, it must be said that it has been happening all around the world since the second half of the XIX century. It�s used by a range of different organizations, from environmentalists concerned about animal rights to religious fundamentalists proclaiming a holy war. Discussing the causes and consequences of such phenomenon are equally important.

Before going into deeper discussion on this theme, it�s important to have in mind a clear definition of �terrorism�. According to Webster�s dictionary, terrorism means �systematic intimidation�. To this I would add that terrorism is �the systematic intimidation of civilians for political gains�, what distinguishes terrorists (that attack harmless civilian targets) from revolutionaries (that attack military targets), for example.

Some argue that the roots of this odious political device are in the global inequality in political rights. I don�t quite agree with this point of view, for some misuse this concept to �justify� terrorist acts, claiming that, till a certain extent, terrorists are only �fighting for their rights with the weapons they�ve got�. I believe that the reason why terrorism exists is nothing but radicalism; for, as far as I�m concerned, killing innocent people has nothing to do with achieving one�s political rights.

One of the consequences of terrorism is the widespread fear of new attacks. So much hysteria has been causing a lot of problems all around the world; just to give an example, we could mention the tragic case of the Brazilian man who was mistaken for a terrorist and killed by British officers. The fatal incident happened just two weeks after suicide bombers killed themselves and 52 other people on the London subway system. It makes us ask ourselves: who is to blame?

Directly connected to so much panic is the emergence of an era of surveillance. All around the world, security technologies such as surveillance cameras have been widely utilized, especially in the developing countries. If George Orwell, author of the classic �1984�, was alive, he would certainly be astonished to see how much the actual world is looking like the one he described in the book. Civilians seem to be giving up their privacy and civil rights in the name of safety (although nobody has proved yet if so much cameras are really preventing new attacks...).


An specific doubt: is it correct separate subject and predicate by commas in English?


Thanks in advance,

Clarissa Alves Machado.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asterix



Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 1654

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where I think an improvement can be made I have put the original in brackets and my suggestion in bold type.
Some of your originals are not wrong ("It 's", for example) but as this seems to be a formal composition, I suggest you keep the language formal, in case you run into an old school teacher.
I think this is a very good effort and your English composition is excellent.
Congratulations!



Although �terrorism� has only become a common word in the daily vocabulary of most of us (after) since the terrorist attacks that took place in New York City (in) on September 11, 2001, it must be said that it has been happening all around the world since the second half of the (XIX) 19th century. (It�s) It is used by a range of different organizations, from environmentalists concerned about animal rights, to religious fundamentalists proclaiming a holy war. Discussing both the causes and the consequences of such a phenomenon (are) is equally important.

Before going into deeper discussion on this theme, it�s important to have in mind a clear definition of �terrorism�. According to Webster�s dictionary, terrorism means �systematic intimidation�. To this I would add that terrorism is �the systematic intimidation of civilians for political gains�. What distinguishes terrorists (that attack harmless civilian targets) from revolutionaries (that attack military targets), for example?

Some argue that the roots of this odious political device are in the global inequality in political rights. I don�t quite agree with this point of view, for some misuse this concept to �justify� terrorist acts, claiming that, (till) to a certain extent, terrorists are only �fighting for their rights with the weapons they(�ve got) have�. I believe that the reason why terrorism exists is nothing but radicalism; for, as far as I�m concerned, killing innocent people has nothing to do with achieving one�s political rights.

One of the consequences of terrorism is the widespread fear of new attacks. (So much) Hysteria has been causing a lot of problems all around the world; just to give an example, we could mention the tragic case of the Brazilian man who was mistaken for a terrorist and killed by British police officers. The fatal incident happened just two weeks after suicide bombers killed themselves and 52 other people on the London subway system. It makes us ask ourselves: who is to blame?

Directly connected to so much panic is the emergence of an era of surveillance. All around the world, security technologies such as surveillance cameras have been widely utilized, especially in the developing countries. If George Orwell, author of the classic �1984�, (was) were alive, he would certainly be astonished to see how much the actual world is looking like the one he described in the book. Civilians seem to be giving up their privacy and civil rights in the name of safety (although nobody has proved yet (if) that so (much) many cameras are really preventing new attacks...).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ClarissaMach



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 644
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for giving me a reply so soon, Asterix!

I'll take you advice about the contractions!

Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group