View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kerstin
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 241 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: folk |
|
|
There's a tendency among cautious* folk* to regard anything that might be offensive as offensive.
Why is that not spelled plural when it can be talk about a lot of people?
Thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One if by land and two if by sea,
And I on the opposite shore shall be
Ready to ride and spread the alarm
Through every Middle s e x village and farm
For the country folk to be up and to arm.
(From "The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere)
"Folk" is one of those words that can be plural either with or without the final "s." Lots of folks call their parents their folks. The folks who love dogs don't always love cats. There are nice folks and grumpy folks.
At the same time, you will hear people talk about Leprechauns and call them the "wee folk." I think it comes straight from the German for people, Volk. (A Volkswagen is literally "the people's car.")
Often when we speak of people who are a little strange or special, we seem to refer to them as folk. Your example is about cautious folk -- as if it is a species or specific group of people. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
missdaredevil
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 1670 Location: Ask me
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a technical term for a noun that can be singular and plural?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
There should be a term for nouns that can be plural in meaning when either singular or plural in form, but I have never heard of it. Someone must know it. . . .
Several of the words that use the same form for singular and plural are animals: elk, moose, salmon, shrimp, deer, bison, swine, grouse, quail. They are just irregular plurals, I guess. But quail also can be pluralized as quails. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also note that 'folk' always means people and it is not used to talk about a single person. So the plural marker is kinda redundant, neverthless allowed as a choice.
Last edited by Anuradha Chepur on Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:56 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, and see also
http://www.answers.com/topic/plural
where the "Our Living Language" article refers to unmarked plurals of class nouns. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|