| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nawee
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Posts: 400
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:48 pm Post subject: What's wrong with this sentence? |
|
|
Hello,
Can someone please tell me where the grammatical mistake is in this sentence and how I can correct it? The numbers indicate that the words that follow are those which could be a mistake.
"We usually interpret someone's quick nose touch (1)as an itch, or (2)that (3)when they rest their hand on their face - they are deeply interested in us, without (4)ever suspecting that we're boring them to death."
Thank you,
Nawee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Atleast 'Anuradha grammar check' is not able to spot any grammar mistake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mary W. Ng
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 261
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:13 pm Post subject: Re: What's wrong with this sentence? |
|
|
| Quote: |
| "We usually interpret someone's quick nose touch (1)as an itch, or (2)that (3)when they rest their hand on their face - they are deeply interested in us, without (4)ever suspecting that we're boring them to death." |
I'd say (3) is wrong. What is the dash doing there? A comma would be more appropriate. _________________ Mary W. Ng
Helping students learn grammar
http:www.aimpublishing.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Charles06
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems that keeping "(2)that)" makes the whole sentence difficult to read and that the use of dash is not required. The whole sentence thus becomes:
"We usually interpret someone's quick nose touch (1)as an itch, or (3)when they rest their hand on their face, they are deeply interested in us, without (4)ever suspecting that we're boring them to death."
This is a compound-complex sentence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redset
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 582 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The numbered words look fine to me but that dash (much as I like them) really has to go. I'd leave the that though - it specifies what's being interpreted in the second part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|