View previous topic :: View next topic |
Is Iraq a Better Place to Iraqis? |
It's not. The way won't work. |
|
57% |
[ 4 ] |
It's not. But the change is good for long term. |
|
42% |
[ 3 ] |
Yes it is. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 7 |
|
Author |
Message |
Outofin
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: Is Iraq a Better Place to Iraqis? |
|
|
The voilence in Iraq is increasing. Compared to Sadam regime, do you think the country now is a better place to Iraqis? Bush believes so. Sadam is gone and people can vote, so Iraq is now a better place. Definitely good to him, but is it good to Iraqis? Now the whole system stopped working. People don't even have the safety of life. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ieltsinsider
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:42 am Post subject: depends |
|
|
In answer to your main question, I'd say it depends on which part of Iraq you live in. In the Kurdish north, things are better. In the Shia south, things are possibly a little better. In the Sunni centre, things are certainly worse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BourneNOIR
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 113
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is one problem with the world, the conflict between culture, history, and political ideology. While in general democracy is a good thing, it just sometimes does not mix with the culture of the region, e.g. Iraq. Democracy requires equal rights to everyone regardless of race, religion, gender, etc. and also the separation of "Church" and "State". I mean, although it is a good intention of trying to transform Iraq into a democratic state for the benefit of the Iraqis, its culture has a high resistance to such transformation due to the heavy emphasis on religion. A model that looks good in one example might not work in others; people just forget to look at the differentiating factors.
In short, the American injected democracy might not work in the short run, but hopefully, it'll spark interest in the population that will allow the Iraqis to form their own version democracy, at least a government much better than Saddam Hussein's regime. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
asterix
Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 1654
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having found the Americans difficult to kill, the terrorists are now killing their fellow Muslims in Iraq.
Obviously they don't believe in their own religion, but even so, you will find few muslims condemning them.
I think Iraq will eventually be a better place to live, but Iran will have to be dealt with before that happens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ltp-008
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 258
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The world without Saddam is better off,now Iraq has had elected government for more than six monthes,democracy needs patient,freedom is not free,in the long run Iraq will be peaceful ,prosperous country which they can defend itself,sustain itself.
Malike government has made a significant progress in Iraq such as education recovery,reduction of violences and economic recovery, when a country is transformed from tyranny into democracy,it needs time for their people to adjust,Iraq had been in dictatorship for more than three decades,the sudden-coming democracy in Iraq has to be digested through a certain periond of time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Outofin
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
asterix wrote: |
Having found the Americans difficult to kill, the terrorists are now killing their fellow Muslims in Iraq.
|
Difficult to kill? Have you been following the casualty number? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ieltsinsider
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:34 pm Post subject: numbers |
|
|
Oh, the Iraqi and foreign insurgents are certainly finding it harder to kill trained American soldiers than to kill innocent Iraqi civilians. No doubt about that. And besides, American soldiers have an annoying tendency to shoot back, whereas Iraqi civilians don't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
asterix
Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 1654
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Americans have conquered a nation of 20 million for the loss of around 2500 soldiers.
That's an unbelievably successful war.
You should take a look at the casualties they suffered in Vietnam, Korea, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The Americans have conquered a nation of 20 million for the loss of around 2500 soldiers.
That's an unbelievably successful war. |
Asterix, I suspect you are George Bush in disguise on this forum, supporting yourself! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
asterix
Joined: 26 Jan 2003 Posts: 1654
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Somebody has to do it.
George Bush is not the Great Satan, no matter what the popular wisdom says. He is a decent man trying to do a difficult job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anuradha Chepur
Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 933
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But the somebody has to be somebody other than Bush himself.
OK, I guess we should have some pro views too to counter the adamant anti views, so that we can get closer to the truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ltp-008
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 258
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anuradha Chepur wrote: |
Quote: |
The Americans have conquered a nation of 20 million for the loss of around 2500 soldiers.
That's an unbelievably successful war. |
Asterix, I suspect you are George Bush in disguise on this forum, supporting yourself! |
Quote: |
Asterix, I suspect you are George Bush in disguise on this forum, supporting yourself! |
[/quote]
Very interesting and funny.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Asterix said:
"Obviously they don't believe in their own religion, but even so, you will find few muslims condemning them."
I guess it's politically incorrect to ask the question, but it occurs to me all the time, too: Why is it that the followers of Islam do not condemn the murder of Muslims by Muslims?
If American Presbyterians and Baptists were pulling each other out of cars and shooting them dead for their beliefs, I'm pretty sure somebody would say, "Hey, that's wrong. That's against the Bible, not to mention against the law and incredibly stupid." _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Outofin
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CP wrote: |
If American Presbyterians and Baptists were pulling each other out of cars and shooting them dead for their beliefs, I'm pretty sure somebody would say, "Hey, that's wrong. That's against the Bible, not to mention against the law and incredibly stupid." |
It sounds like they're allowed by their faith to kill people believing other sects or religions. It can't be, can it? If christians kill and all their folks applaud "unbelievably successful", why say muslims are wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Outofin,
Are you saying that the Koran permits Muslims of one sect to kill those of any other sect?
Are you Muslim? _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|