Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Help with punctuation please

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nawee



Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 400

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:54 pm    Post subject: Help with punctuation please Reply with quote

Hello,

Should there be another comma betwen "who" and "in"? Can we punctuate this sentence differently?

Careful research, however, makes it absolutely clear that Ts'ai Luin was a real man, an official at the Chinese imperial court, who in or about the year 105 A.D., resented Enperor Ho Ti with samples of paper.

Thank you,

Nawee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mister Micawber



Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 774
Location: Yokohama

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

.
You need to be careful of 'comma clutter'; that is why we don't need one after who. Also, that clause could just as well be restrictive. If you find yourself over-commaed, try to rearrange the elements:

However, careful research makes it absolutely clear that Ts'ai Luin was a real man, an official at the Chinese imperial court who presented Emperor Ho Ti with samples of paper in or about the year AD 105.
.
_________________
"I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences." � Gertrude Stein
...............
Canadian-American who teaches English for a living at Mr Micawber's
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nawee



Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 400

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello,

If we don't need a comma after "who", then why is there a comma before "resented"? Isn't it strange to have a comma between the subject ("who") and the verb "presented"?

"... who in or about 105 A.D., presented the Emperor Ho Ti with samples of paper."

I was taught that when the non-defining subordinate clauses is between 2 commas and can be removed without affecting the main clause. Isn't "in or about 105 A.D." a non-defining subordinate clause?

Can I punctuate the sentence this way, if I want to keep the same order of words? Below I chose not to put the comma before "who" and makes "who... paper" a defining subordinate clause of "an official at the Chinese imperial court" instead.

"Careful research, however, makes it absolutely clear that Ts' ai Lun was a real man, an official at the Chinese imperial court who, in or about the year 105 A.D., presented Emperor Ho Ti with samples of paper."

Thank you,

Nawee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mister Micawber



Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 774
Location: Yokohama

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

.
Quote:
If we don't need a comma after "who", then why is there a comma before "resented"?

It's there because you put it there, I suppose, just as you misspelled presented and Emperor. You didn't ask about that comma; you asked about the one before who.

You can see that I took all but two commas out with my revision, including that one. Your revised version is OK, too, though it drags more, with 5 commas. The comma following the full stop of A.D. is awkward also.
.
_________________
"I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences." � Gertrude Stein
...............
Canadian-American who teaches English for a living at Mr Micawber's
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nawee



Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 400

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I didn't write that sentence myself. I found it in an English exercise, which was designed to help students 'disect' complicated sentences they might find in academic English. So I didn't put any comma there personally. I just wanted to understand why the commas were there. I copied all the commas, the same way I copied the spelling mistake. In fact, I didn't realise it was a typo until you corrected it in your post. I thought the sentence didn't make a lot of sense because I myself didn't understand it, not because the sentence had a typo.

Sorry if my questions were not clear before. And thank you for your answers.

Nawee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asterix



Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 1654

PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I'm an old-fashioned kind of guy, and I think you do need a comma after who.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
damon@English24/7



Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 96
Location: Vancouver Canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me add to the debate... and I would love to hear from someone who could answer this authoratatively.

I think you need the commas. You surround clauses or words in the middle of a sentence that are not essential with a pair of commas at each end. Your basic sentence is:

Careful research makes it absolutely clear that Ts'ai Luin was a real man who presented Emperor Ho Ti with samples of paper.

When you add "however," "an official at the Chinese imperial court" and "in about the year 102 A.D." then you need to surround them with commas.

If I were writing the sentence myself, I would rewrite it to avoid using so many commas because I do agree that it looks awkward and is difficult to read with so many commas.

Can anyone elaborate, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asterix



Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 1654

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The idea behind punctuation is to indicate the tones and pauses that would be made if the same words were spoken out loud.
Much of speech is made up of pauses, of hesitations, of small delays and full stops. Without indication of these small, necessary silences it would take the reader much longer to decipher anything he read.
Commas indicate the small pauses inside the sentence. If, when you speak, you would naturally pause at a certain point, that is where you need a comma.
Commas also help to remove ambiguity...
e.g.
Did the cat eat Marvin?
Did the cat eat, Marvin?

Bill, the cat has run away.
Bill, the cat, has run away.

For every kind of pause that is natural to speech, written language has a corresponding mark of punctuation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group