Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

far more superior
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nawee



Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 400

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:04 pm    Post subject: far more superior Reply with quote

Hello,

Is it "far superior" or "far more superior"?

They have far more superior weapons.

"Far more superior" sounds correct to me, but I can't explain why we need "more" if the word "superior" already implies the idea of being "better"?

Thank you,

Nawee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yinglish



Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a matter of an increasing degree of emphasis. Like this:

David Beckham is better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is more better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is far more better looking than Rowan Atkinson.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yinglish,

Superb!



--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CP



Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 2875
Location: California

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Superior" means "better" or "higher," depending on the context. You can say "far superior" just as you can say "far better," but you cannot say "more superior" or "more better."

I can't agree with Yinglish's view. What you can say properly is:

David Beckham is better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is more good-looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is far better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is much better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
_________________
You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nawee



Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 400

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand your examples with "better looking" and "far better looking", CP. But why is it that we can say both "far superior" and "far more superior"? Do they mean the same thing or is there a difference in the degree of superiority?

Thank you,

Nawee
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Nawee,

Review these sites on degrees of adjectives and the definition of "superior" and you will see that "far more superior" is a very acceptable (also very common) phrase.

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/adjectives.htm#premodifiers

http://www.wordsmyth.net/live/home.php?script=search&matchid=41381&returnFields


You'll notice "superior" can be comparative (better) or superlative (best).

Although very few dictionaries will list superior as a superlative, in common speech and everyday usage, this connotation is quite prevalent.

Report card grade: good, very good, excellent (best)
Report card grade: needs improvement, satisfactory, superior (best)

This dog is of a superior breed.
connotation: This dog is of the best breed.

Name of a company: Superior Kitchenware
connotation: Better kitchenware? No, best kitchenware.

This is superior.
This is best.


--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CP



Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 2875
Location: California

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nawee wrote:
I understand your examples with "better looking" and "far better looking", CP. But why is it that we can say both "far superior" and "far more superior"? Do they mean the same thing or is there a difference in the degree of superiority?

Thank you,

Nawee

You cannot correctly say "far more superior." You can say "far superior" just as you can say "far better." It is a matter of how much better -- a little better or much better. A little higher or much higher. Yinglish's second and third examples were not correct.
_________________
You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sometimes English can be subjective.

Dialogue you might hear:

Hey Dave, did you see that Benz? It looks really cool.

Well, I don't know John, I think the new BMW looks better.

Come on Dave. You must be blind. The interior of the Benz is far more superior than the interior of the BMW.


To what degree the English in the dialogue might be incorrect is questionable. But the dialogue itself is pretty common.


--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to play the "Google" game, googling "far superior" gives 1,220,000 hits, and googling "far more superior" gives 92,600 hits. I prefer "far superior" myself. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would expect that result. The second phrase has a higher degree of modification. Hence, it is used less often.

great grandfather - 1,300,000
great great grandfather - 892,000

I'm sure it's been discussed at length. IMHO, Google is a great tool to explore and get initial indications. But, I would never interpret its results as anything close to being definitive. Just too many variables.


--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CP



Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 2875
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Google, Schmoogle. It is still not correct to say "far more superior" or even "more superior."

Shall we start saying "ain't got no" is good English because of Google?

Google results:

"ain't got no" 1,250,000 hits.

"have no" 225,000,000 hits.

Oh, and "ain't got no" has the higher degree of modification.
_________________
You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said... too many variables.

Let's start from the beginning.

The BMW looks good.
The Benz looked better.
But, the Jaguar looked even more better.
We finally decided that the Bentley looked the best.

According to a fairly reliable source, there's nothing wrong with these statements.

Both adverbs and adjectives in their comparative and superlative forms can be accompanied by premodifiers, single words and phrases, that intensify the degree.

* We were a lot more careful this time.
* He works a lot less carefully than the other jeweler in town.
* We like his work so much better.
* You'll get your watch back all the faster.

And sometimes a set phrase, usually an informal noun phrase, is used for this purpose:

* He arrived a whole lot sooner than we expected.
* That's a heck of a lot better


Now, I submit that the two phrases below are approximately the same; the difference only in the degree of "better":

even more better
far more better

Now, replace better with "superior."


--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually Lotus, I can accept all of your examples except "even more better" and "far more better". I really can't use "more" with "better." I'm not saying someone somewhere doesn't use it, but it isn't something I would feel comfortable teaching students.

And I know what Google can and can't do. I was just indicating the obvious preference in my post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lotus



Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 862

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What we do here is discuss English in its many forms. There is prescriptive and descriptive, connotative and denotative, structural and conversational.

much better
more better
a lot better
far better

These are all very common phrases. It's true that much more better or far more better are not as common as the list above. But, they are not incorrect as the quoted source indicates. Perhaps these phrases are more in line with the descriptive, connotative and conversational part of English.

This is in answer to Nawee's original question:

Is it "far superior" or "far more superior"
They have far more superior weapons.
"Far more superior" sounds correct to me, but I can't explain why we need "more" if the word "superior" already implies the idea of being "better"?


The use of "more" is to enhance or intensify the degree of the adjective "superior."

Suggested alternative sentences:

They have better weapons.
Their weapons are better.
Their weapons are far more better than ours.
Their weapons are far better than what we have.

Their weapons are superior.
Their weapons are far more superior than ours.

Why did we win the war? It was because our weapons were far more superior than theirs. (snobbishly)


My apologies Lorikeet. My terse statement was only meant to express my personal reservations on the usefulness of Google's numerical search results.


It's a shame that the tone of this thread had gotten away from the very funny initial response from Yinglish! In my opinion, there was nothing wrong with his response. I might have used better-looking in the second and third sentences. But, his use of degree of emphasis progression, along with the pictures, was effective and funny! Smile


--lotus
_________________
War does not make one great --Yoda


Last edited by lotus on Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:10 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yinglish



Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FYI:

http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/student/viewtopic.php?t=23522
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group