| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:17 am Post subject: afford |
|
|
Dear teachers,
Would you please tell me how you understand the word "afford" hereunder, and why?
Why novels and plays are so often untrue to life is because their authors, perhaps of necessity, make their characters all of a piece. They cannot afford to make them self-contradictory [ 1) writers could not allow themselves to make the characters contradictory 2) writers could not allow the characters to be self-contradictory], for then they become incomprehensible, and yet self-contradictory is what most of us are.
Somerset Maugham, A friend in need
Thank you for your help.
Hela |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Usually, "afford" means to be able to purchase something, to have enough money to buy something. But it also can be used as here, to mean that one cannot, for practical purposes, do something, because it is too hard, too costly in some sense other than in money.
A writer has to make his characters unrealistically consistent, not self-contradictory. He cannot, for all practical purposes, make his characters like real people, because of the risk that the reader will become confused or irritated. That risk is too costly; that is why the writer can't afford to do it.
Make sense? _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it does!
But for translation purposes, would you say that the writer cannot allow HIMSELF to do that, or he cannot allow HIS CHARACTERS to be that?
All the best |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
One more question, please.
In the following sentence the writer says: "In books on logic they will tell you that it is absurd to say that yellow is tubular or gratitude heavier than air".
Would you please tell me why he uses the future there? Can it be replaced by the present?
All the best,
Hela |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The way the quoted material is written, it means that the writer cannot afford to make his characters that way.
As for using the future tense in what the books say, yes, you can put it in the present tense. The writer used the future tense to indicate that when you go check those books, in one minute or weeks from now, sometime in the future, that is what the books will tell you. It's okay either way. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hela
Joined: 02 May 2004 Posts: 420 Location: Tunisia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you very much CP.
Have a nice day  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|