View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yoshi-pooh
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:37 am Post subject: is/are |
|
|
Hi, everyone!
1. I don't think two years is a very long time.
2. I don't think two years are a very long time.
I understand "is" is grammaticall correct. However, I've also found many examples of "...years are..." on the Internet.
Can "are" be okay as well as "is"?
Thank you!
yoshi-pooh |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
2006
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1) Stick with "is".
Numerical expressions of time, money and distance take a singular verb. But 'The years are flying by.' is correct.
2) grammatically correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mister Micawber

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 774 Location: Yokohama
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
.
Not to dispute 2006, but to clarify...
Quote: |
Can "are" be okay as well as "is"? |
Yes. 'Two years' can be considered a single period ('is') or multiple time units ('are').
. _________________ "I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences." � Gertrude Stein
...............
Canadian-American who teaches English for a living at Mr Micawber's |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yoshi-pooh
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, Mister Micawber
Thank you for your reply.
According to your reply, are both is and are fine in the sentence below?
I don't think two years (is/ are) a very long period of time.
yoshi-pooh |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mister Micawber

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 774 Location: Yokohama
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No. Now you have set up the two years as an overt period of time, so use 'is'.
. _________________ "I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences." � Gertrude Stein
...............
Canadian-American who teaches English for a living at Mr Micawber's |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|